Federalism and Democracy in the Basque Country

The Spanish Federal Challenge
Chapter

Abstract

This paper shows how the Basque political system, articulated in the Law of the Historic Territories, has checked the tendency that political and economic power has to centralize and concentrate by introducing an institutional distribution of these powers by territory and constitutionalizing them. It will be argued that this distinctive pattern of distributing power and political autonomy has led to a differentiated (Basque) federal democracy. This thesis will be developed by showing how the institutional system has determined a particular socio-economic structure and how both of these, in turn, have shaped specific democratic and federal practices and demands. A systematic analysis of the processes that have featured these practices and demands might clarify the conditions under which the antagonism between ‘constitutionalists and nationalists’ occurs. The inquiry into the political and socio-economic context in which this confrontation takes place could shed light on what federal arrangements would best nurture democratic governance of Spanish diversity—not only cultural but also political and territorial.

Keywords

Social Cohesion Basque Country Free Association Shared Rule Active Labor Market Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alvite, P. (2000) La inmigración extranjera en el País Vasco. In: II Congreso sobre la Inmigración en España. Universidad del País Vasco, Leioa.Google Scholar
  2. Aranda, J. (2004) La mezcla del pueblo vasco. Historia. Papeles de Ermua 6:145–80.Google Scholar
  3. Bourne, A. K. (2008) The European Union and the accommodation of Basque difference in Spain. Manchester University Press, Manchester, 269 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (2005, 2011). http://www.cis.es/cis/opencms/EN/index.html
  5. Corcuera, J. (2006) The Autonomy of the Basque Country: Singularities. In: Fundación para la Libertad, 12 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Elzo, J. (2001) Gipuzkoa 2020 - Reto 1: Sociedad Civil, La dimensión socio-cultural. www.gipuzkoa.net/g2020/docum/G2020-Sociedad-Elzo.es
  7. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 248 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Eurostat Regional Yearbook (2009) Statistical Book, European Communities, Luxemburg. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home/
  9. Euskal Erkidegoko Administrazio Publikoa (2011). http://www.euskadi.net/
  10. Euskobarometro (1999, 2008, 2011). http://www.ehu.es/euskobarometro/
  11. Eustat, Euskal Estatistika Erakundea (2011). http://en.eustat.es/idioma_c/indice.html#axzz1IYz5dbzq
  12. Fundación BBVA- IVIE (2008) Competitividad de las regiones españolas, Ivie, Madrid.Google Scholar
  13. Gallastegui, C. and Gallastegui, I. (1986) Un análisis económico de la Ley de Territorios Históricos. Eusko Ikaskuntza, San Sebastian, 79 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Garaikoetxea, C. (2002) Euskadi: la transición inacabada. Planeta, Barcelona, 360 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Gomez, M. and Etxebarria, G. (2000) Panorama of the Basque Country and its Competence for Self-Government. European Planning Studies 8, 4:521–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Growing Regions, Growing Europe (2007). European Communities, Luxemburg. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/cohesion4/pdf/4cr_en.pdf
  17. Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. (eds.) (2001) Varieties of capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 540 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Herrero de Miñón, M. (1998) Derechos históricos y constitución. Taurus Pensamiento, Madrid, 343 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Huber, E. and Stephens, J. (2001) Development and crisis of the welfare state. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 368 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Idescat, Institut d'Estadística de Catalunya (2011). http://www.idescat.cat/en/
  21. Ine, Instituto Nacional de Estadística (2011). http://www.ine.es/
  22. Ive, Institut Valencià d'Estadística (2011). http://www.ive.es/
  23. Katzenstein, P.J. (1985) Small states in world markets: industrial policy in Europe. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 268 pp.Google Scholar
  24. Kitschelt, H., Lange, P., Marks, G. and Stephens, J.D. (1999) Continuity and change in contemporary capitalism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 527 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lecours, A. and Nootens, G. (eds.) (2009) Dominant Nationalism, Dominant Ethnicity: Identity, Federalism and Democracy. Peter Lang, Brussels, 336 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Lipjhart, A. (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Governments Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. Yale University Press, London, 351 pp.Google Scholar
  27. Moreno, L. (2008) La federalización de España. Siglo XXI, Madrid, 203 pp.Google Scholar
  28. Ordozgoiti, K. (2010) El futuro nos pertenece. Alberdania, Irun, 300 pp.Google Scholar
  29. Pierson, P. (2001) The new politics of the welfare state. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 519 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schmidt, V.A. (2002) The futures of European capitalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 357 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tamayo, V. (2008) Vasconia: la reivindicación política pendiente. Erein, Donostia, 314 pp.Google Scholar
  32. Tilly, C. (2007) Democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 234 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.St Edmund’s CollegeUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations