The Ways of Federalism in Western Countries and the Horizons of Territorial Autonomy in Spain pp 269-281 | Cite as
The Commission Co-ordinating Climate Change Policies: About the Complexity of Vertical and Horizontal Mainstreaming of Climate Change Policy and the Intergovernmental Relations
Abstract
This paper is aimed to explain the positive elements of the Commission Co-ordinating Climate Change Policies as an instrument of intergovernmental relations in the frame of a shared competence. Also, it is directed to show the main causes of its lack of effectiveness and efficacy and propose some changes in the system of intergovernmental relations regarding climate change policies, as well as of being pertinent in environmental policies too.
When Climate Change came into the Spanish public agenda, it followed the imprecise system of distribution of competences established for the environmental matter, and this way, it has been seen as a shared competence between the State and Autonomous Communities. In fact, after reviewing Article 45.2 of the Spanish Constitution, which gives public authorities in general a duty to protect, restore, and promote the environment and paying attention to sections 149.1.23 and 148.1.9, it is necessary to turn our attention to the provisions set out by Autonomous Statutes and the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court. Anyway, even after that, there are no well-drawn borders between their spheres of competence. The lack of clarity in the distribution of competence shows how indispensable the existence of instruments is to guarantee the normal functioning of the environmental policies.
The complexity of the matter and its peculiar mainstreaming—horizontal and vertical—showed the necessity to establish new instruments in order to avoid the overlapping and duplicity of measures and efforts designed to achieve the same objective and to construct a common policy to fight against a global problem. This is the panorama where the Commission Co-ordinating Climate Change Policies was created by the law 1/2005 of 9th of March, establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading—transposition of directive 2003/87/EC. It was created as an instrument for the cooperation and coordination of the measures developed by the central power and the Autonomous Communities.
In order to analyze this instrument, it is necessary to start with the complex distribution of competences and the special situation of climate change issues. This will lead us to the study of the Spanish intergovernmental relations system as a possible way to solve the problems between competent authorities and, concretely, the paper of the Commission Co-ordinating Climate Change policies.
Keywords
Clean Development Mechanism Competent Authority Central Power Climate Change Policy Autonomous CommunityReferences
- Aja, E. (2003). El Estado Autonómico. Federalismo y hechos diferenciales. Alianza. Madrid.Google Scholar
- Arlucea Ruíz, E. (2005). Las competencias medioambientales estatutarias: entre la legislación básica estatal y la normativa local. In Vidal Beltrán, J.M. and García Herrera, M. A. Estado Autonómico: integración, solidaridad y diversidad, Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública. COLEX. Madrid. 453-585 pp.Google Scholar
- Alda Fernández, M. and Ramos Gallarín, F. (2006). Relaciones intergubernamentales y políticas públicas: el caso de la política de medio ambiente. In López Nieto, L. (coord.) Relaciones intergubernamentales en la España Democrática: interdependencia, autonomía, conflicto y cooperación. Dykinson. Madrid.Google Scholar
- Cámara Villar, G. (2004). El principio y las relaciones de colaboración entre el Estado y las Comunidades Autónomas. Revista de Derecho Constitucional Español 1: 197-240 pp.Google Scholar
- García Morales, M.J. (2009). Instrumentos y vías de institucionalización de las relaciones intergubernamentales. In Arbós Martín, X., Colino Cámara, C., García Morales, M.J. and Parrado Díez, S. Las relaciones intergubernamentales en el Estado autonómico. La posición de los autores. Generalitat de Catalunya. Institut d’Estudis Autonòmics. Barcelona.Google Scholar
- González Ayala, M.D. (2008). Las relaciones intergubernamentales en el nuevo marco de las reformas estatutarias: la diferente conciliación de la bilateralidad-multilateralidad en las relaciones Estado-Comunidad Autónoma. INDRET. Revista para el análisis del derecho. Barcelona.Google Scholar
- Jaria I Manzano, J. (2005). Problemas competenciales fundamentales en material de protección del medio ambiente. Revista Vasca de Administración Pública 73: 117-134 pp.Google Scholar
- Lozano Cutanda, B.; Alonso García, R. and Plaza Martín, C. (1999). El medio ambiente ante el Tribunal Constitucional: problemas competenciales y ultraeficacia protectora. Revista de administración pública 148: 99-132 pp.Google Scholar
- Leff, E. (2003) La complejidad ambiental. Siglo XXI editores. México. 29 p. (3rd ed.)Google Scholar
- Marco Marco, J. J and Pérez Gabaldón, M. Constitución y medio ambiente: una cuestión todavía por definir. In Martínez Sospedra, M. La Constitución Española después de su trigésimo aniversario. Tirant-Lo Blanc. Valencia. 2010. 179-210 pp.Google Scholar
- Moreno, L. (2000), Federalization of Spain. Frank Cass. London.Google Scholar
- Ortega Álvarez, L. (2008). El medio ambiente y los nuevos Estatutos de Autonomía. Noticias de la Unión Europea 182: 55-62 pp.Google Scholar
- Pérez Gabaldón, M. Los problemas competenciales en materia medioambiental y las relaciones intergubernamentales como posible vía de solución. Corts Valencianes. Col.lecció Temes de Les Corts. Valencia. 2012.Google Scholar
- Terol Becerra, M. J. (2000). Acerca del carácter más razonable que racional de la jurisprudencia constitucional relativa al medio ambiente. Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional 59: 331-344 pp.Google Scholar
- Watts, R.L. (2008). Comparasing Federal Sytems. Institute of Intergovernmental Relations. 117-191 pp.Google Scholar