A Socio-Political Look at Equity in the School Organization of Mathematics Education

Abstract

This paper presents some theoretical tools to help understand the meaning of mathematics education as socio-political practices and the implications of these for researching mathematics education. Taking two cases of schools and students in Denmark and South Africa, the paper illustrates how the theoretical and methodological ideas come into operation when illuminating issues of equity. It is contended that the disadvantaged positioning of some students for participating in mathematics teaching and learning is the result of the routines, ideas, shared meanings, and ways of talking and conceiving mathematics education among the actors in the school organization, inside as well as outside the classroom.

References

  1. Adler, J. (2001a). Resourcing practice and equity: A dual challenge for mathematics education. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz, & B. Nebres (Eds.), Sociocultural research on mathematics education. An international perspective (pp. 185–200). Mahwah: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
  2. Adler, J. (2001b). Teaching mathematics in multilingual classrooms. Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer. Google Scholar
  3. Boaler, J. (1997). Experiencing school mathematics. Teaching styles, sex and setting. Milton Keynes: Open University. Google Scholar
  4. Boaler, J. (1998). Nineties girls challenge eighties stereotypes: Updating gender perspectives. In C. Keitel (Ed.), Social justice and mathematics education. Gender, class, ethnicity and the politics of schooling (pp. 278–293). Berlin: IOWME—Freie Universität Berlin. Google Scholar
  5. Burton, L. (Ed.). (2003). Which way social justice in mathematics education? Westport: Praeger. Google Scholar
  6. Cobb, P., McClain, K., de Silva Lamberg, T., & Dean, C. (2003). Situating teachers’ instructional practices in the institutional setting of the school and district. Educational researcher: A publication of the American Educational Research Association, 32(6), 13–25. Google Scholar
  7. De Freitas, E. (2004). Plotting intersections along the political axis: The interior voice of dissenting mathematics teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 55, 259–274. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fennema, E. (1995). Mathematics, gender and research. In B. Grevholm & G. Hanna (Eds.), Gender and mathematics education (pp. 21–38). Lund, Sweden: Lund University Press. Google Scholar
  9. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge (1st American ed.). New York: Pantheon Books. Google Scholar
  10. Foucault, M., & Faubion, J. D. (2000). Power. New York: New Press; Distributed by W.W. Norton. Google Scholar
  11. Ginsburg, H. (1997). The myth of the deprived child: New thoughts on poor children. In A. B. Powell & M. Frankenstein (Eds.), Ethnomathematics: Challenging eurocentrism in mathematics education (pp. 129–154). Albany: State University of New York Press. Google Scholar
  12. Hardy, T. (2004). “There’s no hiding place”. Foucault’s notion of normalization at work in a mathematics lesson. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Mathematics education within the postmodern (pp. 103–119). Greenwich: Information Age. Google Scholar
  13. Keitel, C. (2006). Mathematics, knowledge and political power. In J. Maasz & W. Schloeglmann (Eds.), New mathematics education research and practice (pp. 11–22). Rotterdam: Sense. Google Scholar
  14. Keitel, C. (Ed.). (1998). Social justice and mathematics education. Gender, class, ethnicity and the politics of schooling. Berlin: IOWME—Freie Universität Berlin. Google Scholar
  15. Leder, G., & Forgasz, H. (1998). Single-sex groupings for mathematics: An equitable solution? In C. Keitel (Ed.), Social justice and mathematics education. Gender, class, ethnicity and the politics of schooling (pp. 162–179). Berlin: IOWME—Freie Universität Berlin. Google Scholar
  16. Lerman, S. (2006). Cultural psychology, anthropology and sociology: The developing ‘strong’ social turn. In J. Maasz & W. Schloeglmann (Eds.), New mathematics education research and practice (pp. 171–188). Rotterdam: Sense. Google Scholar
  17. Licón-Khisty, L., & Chval, K. (2002). Pedagogic discourse and equity in mathematics: When teachers’ talk matters. Mathematics Education Research Journal. Special issue: Equity and Mathematics Education, 14(2), 154–168. Google Scholar
  18. Magne, O. (2001). Literature on special educational needs in mathematics. A bibliography with some comments. Malmö, Sweden: Department of Educational and Psychological Research—Malmö University. Google Scholar
  19. Meaney, T. (2004). So what’s power got to do with it? In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Mathematics education within the postmodern (pp. 181–200). Greenwich: Information Age. Google Scholar
  20. Perry, P., Valero, P., Castro, M., Gómez, P., & Agudelo, C. (1998). Calidad de la educación matemática en secundaria. Actores y procesos en la institución educativa. Bogotá: Una empresa docente. Google Scholar
  21. Perry, P., Valero, P., & Gómez, P. (1996). La problemática de las matemáticas escolares desde una perspectiva institucional. In P. Gómez (Ed.), La problemátca de las matemáticas escolares. Un reto para directivos y profesores. México: Una empresa docente y Grupo Editorial Iberoamé rica. Google Scholar
  22. Popkewitz, T. S. (2002). Whose heaven and whose redemption? The alchemy of the mathematics curriculum to save (please check one or all of the following: (a) the economy, (b) democracy, (c) the nation, (d) human rights, (d) the welfare state, (e) the individual). In P. Valero, & O. Skovsmose (Eds.), Proceedings of the third international conference on mathematics education and society (pp. 29–45). Copenhagen: Center for research in learning mathematics. Google Scholar
  23. Rajas Secondary School (1997). Constitution of Rajas Secondary School. Unpublished manuscript, Durban. Google Scholar
  24. Rogers, P., & Kaiser, G. (1995). Equity in mathematics education: Influences of feminism and culture. London, Washington: Falmer Press. Google Scholar
  25. Setati, K. (2005). Power and access in multilingual mathematics classrooms. Paper presented at the fourth international conference on mathematics education and society, Gold Coast, Australia. Google Scholar
  26. Skovsmose, O., & Valero, P. (2001). Breaking political neutrality: The critical engagement of mathematics education with democracy. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz, & B. Nebres (Eds.), Sociocultural research on mathematics education. An international perspective (pp. 37–55). Mahwah: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
  27. Skovsmose, O., & Valero, P. (2002). Democratic access to powerful mathematical ideas. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education. Directions for the 21st century (pp. 383–407). Mahwah: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
  28. Sriraman, B. (Ed.). (2007). The montana mathematics enthusiast. Monograph 1: International perspectives on social justice in mathematics education. Missoula: Department of Mathematical Sciences—The University of Montana. Google Scholar
  29. Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Google Scholar
  30. Stake, R. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–467). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Google Scholar
  31. Undervisningsministeriet (1995). Matematik. Faghæfte 12: Undervisningsministeriet. Google Scholar
  32. Valero, P. (2002a). The myth of the active learner: From cognitive to socio-political interpretations of students in mathematics classrooms. In P. Valero & O. Skovsmose (Eds.), Proceedings of the third international conference on mathematics education and society (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 489–500). Copenhagen: Center for research in learning mathematics. Google Scholar
  33. Valero, P. (2002b). Reform, democracy and mathematics education. Towards a socio-political frame for understanding change in the organization of secondary school mathematics. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Danish University of Education, Copenhagen. Google Scholar
  34. Valero, P. (2004). Postmodernism as an attitude of critique to dominant mathematics education research. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Mathematics education within the postmodern (pp. 35–54). Greenwich: Information Age. Google Scholar
  35. Valero, P. (2007). In between the global and the local: The politics of mathematics education reform in a globalized society. In B. Atweh, A. Calabrese Barton, M. Borba, N. Gough, C. Keitel, C. Vistro-Yu, & R. Vithal (Eds.), Internationalisation and globalisation in mathematics and science education (pp. 421–439). New York: Springer. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vithal, R. (2003). In search of a pedagogy of conflict and dialogue for mathematics education. Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zevenbergen, R., & Flavel, S. (2007). Undertaking an archaeological dig in search of pedagogical relay. In B. Sriraman (Ed.), The montana mathematics enthusiast. Monograph 1: International perspectives on social justice in mathematics education (pp. 63–74). Missoula: Department of Mathematical Sciences—The University of Montana. Google Scholar
  38. Zevenbergen, R., & Ortiz-Franco, L. (Eds.). (2002). Mathematics education research journal. Special issue: Equity and mathematics education, 14(2). Melbourne: MERGA. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Education, Learning and PhilosophyAalborg UniversityAalborg EastDenmark

Personalised recommendations