Preface to “A Socio-Political Look at Equity in the School Organization of Mathematics Education”

Part of the Advances in Mathematics Education book series (AME)

Abstract

Whenever we place our attention on the issue of equity in mathematics education, we are addressing a broad social, political, economic, and cultural problem that is related to how societies create and set in place mechanisms that differentiate, include, and exclude certain peoples from valued resources, either material or symbolic. My main point in this paper is to provide evidence that it is not possible to assume that “equity” is a matter that only and exclusively emerges and is reproduced inside mathematics classrooms. Since “problems of equity” in mathematics are a part of general problems of equity, inclusion, and exclusion in society at large (Pais and Valero 2011), I intend to focus on how the notions of ability/disability associated with the exclusion of certain children emerge in the practices and discourses inside the school organization. Of course, the school organization, again, is only one site in which mechanisms of inclusion and exclusion operate in society.

Keywords

Mathematics Education Social Practice School Mathematics Mathematics Classroom Mathematics Education Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Knijnik, G., & Wanderer, F. (2010). Mathematics education and differential inclusion: A study about two Brazilian time–space forms of life. ZDM, 42(3–4), 349–360. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Lange, T. (2009). Difficulties, meaning and marginalisation in mathematics learning as seen through children’s eyes. Aalborg: Aalborg University—Department of Learning and Philosophy. Google Scholar
  4. Martin, D. B. (2010). Not so strange bedfellows: Racial projects and the mathematics education enterprise. In U. Gellert, E. Jablonka & C. Morgan (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth international mathematics education and society conference (MES6) (pp. 57–79). Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin. Google Scholar
  5. Mendick, H. (2008). Subtracting difference: Troubling transitions from GCSE to AS-level mathematics. British Educational Research Journal, 34(6), 711–732. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Moreau, M.-P., Mendick, H., & Epstein, D. (2010). Constructions of mathematicians in popular culture and learners’ narratives: A study of mathematical and non-mathematical subjectivities. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(1), 25–38. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Pais, A., & Valero, P. (2011). Beyond disavowing the politics of equity and quality in mathematics education. In B. Atweh, M. Graven, W. Secada & P. Valero (Eds.), Mapping equity and quality in mathematics education (pp. 35–48). New York: Springer. Google Scholar
  8. Stentoft, D., & Valero, P. (2010). Fragile learning in mathematics classrooms: How mathematics lessons are not just for learning mathematics. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Unpacking pedagogies. New perspectives for mathematics (pp. 87–107). Charlotte, USA: IAP. Google Scholar
  9. Valero, P. (2007). A socio-political look at equity in the school organization of mathematics education. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik. The Intentional Journal on Mathematics Education, 39(3), 225–233. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Valero, P. (2009). What has power got to do with mathematics education? In P. Ernest, B. Greer & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Critical issues in mathematics education (pp. 237–254). Greenwich, USA: IAP. Google Scholar
  11. Valero, P. (2010). Mathematics education as a network of social practices. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne & F. Arzarello (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth congress of the European society for research in mathematics education (pp. LIV–LXXX). Lyon: Institut National de Récherche Pédagogique. Google Scholar
  12. Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason: Cognitive development and the production of rationality. London, New York: Routledge. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations