Cognitive Science: An Introduction

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter presents a general introduction to basic concepts in cognitive science. This chapter provides a common framework to organize the basic knowledge: the human information processing (HIP) system. The HIP is a framework that represents different subsystems including the perceptual system, the motor system, and the cognitive system. The perceptual and motor systems are briefly discussed first. Then, the cognitive systems and its different subsystems including memory and attention, learning, problem solving, and decision making are discussed. This chapter is not intended to be a comprehensive review of the current knowledge in cognitive science, but rather a general introduction of the most fundamental processes and the well-known findings about HIP’s different subsystems. It is expected that this introduction would help readers to obtain a general overview of cognitive science and of cognitive psychology topics that are relevant for cardiovascular interventions.

Keywords

Selective Attention Motor System Cognitive Science Cognitive System Work Memory Capacity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Simon HA (1979) Models of thought, vol 1. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Card SK, Moran TP, Newell A (1983) The human information-processor. In: Card SK, Moran TP, Newell A (eds) The psychology of human-computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yarbus AL (1967) Eye movements and vision. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fitts PM (1954) The information capacity of the human motor control system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol 47:381–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    MacKenzie IS (1992) Fitts’ law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Hum-Comput Interact 7(1):91–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miller GA (1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 63(2):81–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Proctor RW, Van Zandt T (2008) Human factors in simple and complex systems. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gonzalez C, Madhavan P (2011) Diversity during training enhances detection of novel stimuli. J Cogn Psychol 23(3):342–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brunstein A, Gonzalez C (2010) Preparing for novelty with diverse training. Appl Cogn Psychol 25(5):682–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Young MD, Healy AF, Gonzalez C, Dutt V, Bourne LE (2011) Effects of training with added difficulties on RADAR detection. Appl Cogn Psychol 25:395–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Treisman AM, Sykes M, Gelade G (1977) Selective attention and stimulus integration. In: Dornic S (ed) Attention and performance VI. Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gopher D, Kahneman D (1971) Individual differences in attention and the prediction of flight criteria. Percept Mot Skills 33(3):1335–1342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gonzalez C, Lerch JF, Lebiere C (2003) Instance-based learning in dynamic decision making. Cogn Sci 27(4):591–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Edwards W (1962) Dynamic decision theory and probabilistic information processing. Hum Factors 4:59–73Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rapoport A (1975) Research paradigms for studying dynamic decision behavior. In: Wendt D, Vlek C (eds) Utility, probability, and human decision making. Reidel, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gonzalez C, Lebiere C (2005) Instance-based cognitive models of decision making. In: Zizzo D, Courakis A (eds) Transfer of knowledge in economic decision-making. Macmillan (Palgrave Macmillan), New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Martin MK, Gonzalez C, Lebiere C (2004) Learning to make decisions in dynamic environments: ACT-R plays the beer game. In: Lovett MC, Schunn CD, Lebiere C et al (eds) Proceedings of the sixth international conference on cognitive modeling. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gonzalez C, Best BJ, Healy AF et al (2010) A cognitive modeling account of simultaneous learning and fatigue effects. J Cogn Syst Res 12(1):19–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gonzalez C, Dutt V (2011) Instance-based learning: integrating decisions from experience in sampling and repeated choice paradigms. Psychological review, 118(4):523–551, doi: 10.1037/a0024558Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dutt V, Yamaguchi M, Gonzalez C, Proctor RW (2009) An instance-based learning model of stimulus–response compatibility effects in mixed location-relevant and location-irrelevant tasks. In: Howes A, Peebles D, Cooper R (eds) Proceedings of the 9th international conference on cognitive modeling – ICCM2009, Manchester, 2009Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lebiere C, Gonzalez C, Martin M (2007) Instance-based decision making model of repeated binary choice. In: Lewis RL, Polk TA, Laird JE (eds) Proceedings of the 8th international conference on cognitive modeling, Ann Arbor, 2007Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lejarraga T, Dutt V, Gonzalez C (2010) Instance-based learning: a general model of repeated binary choice. J Behav Decis Making doi: 10.1002/bdm.722  wileyonlinelibrary.com

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dynamic Decision Making Laboratory, Department of Social and Decision SciencesCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations