Autonomous and Interoperable Smart Sensors for Environmental Monitoring Applications

  • J. Higuera
  • J. Polo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 146)

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to demonstrate the feasibility of autonomous and interoperable smart sensors that employ the IEEE1451 standardization in pervasive environments. These devices contain a power management submodule based on energy harvesting techniques in order to enlarge their useful lifetime. Low power wireless technologies, such as IEEE 802.15.4, ZigBee and 6LoWPAN have been used to determine the interoperability of smart sensors through experimental tests by using Commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) architectures. This work establishes a new Finite State Machine (FSM), a compressed transducer electronic data sheets model and a reduced set of IEEE1451 standard commands due to the limits of the present IEEE1451 standard. For tests, the base station is modeled such as gateway, to design the Network Capable Application Processor (NCAP), and the Wireless Transducer Interface Module (WTIM) is an environmental sensor node. The conclusions drawn from this work will be used as guidelines for the implementation of interoperable wireless sensors networks based on autonomous smart sensors for environmental monitoring tasks.

Keywords

Sensor Node Wireless Sensor Network Medium Access Control Finite State Machine Sonic Anemometer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barrenetxea, G., Ingelrest, F., Schaefer, G., Vett, M.: The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Successful Wireless Sensor Network Deployments. In: 6th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems, pp. 43–56 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Murty, R., Mainland, G., Rose, I., Chowdhury, A., Gosain, A., Bers, J., et al.: CitySense: An Urban Scale Wireless Sensor Network and Testbed. In: IEEE International Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security, pp. 583–588 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tuan, D., Hu, W., Sikka, P., Corke, P., Overs, L., Brosnan, S.: Design and Deployment of a Remote Robust Sensor Network: Experiences from an Outdoor Water Quality Monitoring Network. In: 32nd IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks, pp. 799–806 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Basha, E., Ravela, S., Rus, D.: Model-Based Monitoring for Early Warning Flood Detection. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems ACM SenSys 2008, pp. 295–308 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Werner-Allen, G., Johnson, J., Ruiz, M., Lees, J., Welsh, M.: Monitoring Volcanic Eruptions with a Wireless Sensor Network. In: Second IEEE European Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks, pp. 108–120 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Juang, P., Oki, H., Wang, Y., Martonosi, M., Peh, L., Rubenstein, D.: Energy Efficient Computing for Wildlife Tracking: Design Tradeoffs and Early Experiences with ZebraNet. In: Tenth Intl. Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operative Systems (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen, Y., Shu, J., Zhang, S., Liu, L., Sun, L.: Data Fusion in Wireless Sensor Networks. In: Second International IEEE Symposium on Electronic Commerce and Security, vol. 2, pp. 504–509 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ballari, D., Wachowicz, N., Callejo, M.: Metadata behind the Interoperability of Wireless Sensor Networks. Sensors, 3635–3651 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee, K., Song, E.: Understanding IEEE 1451-Networked smart transducer interface standard - What is a smart transducer?. IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine, 11–17 (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    IEEE 802.15.4 std. Standard for Information Technology. Telecommunications and Information Exchange Between Systems- Local and Metropolitan Area Networks- Specific Requirements Part 15.4: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for Low-R (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    IEEE1451.0 std. IEEE Standard for a Smart Transducer Interface for Sensors and Actuators - Common Functions, Communication Protocols, and Transducer Electronic Data Sheet (TEDS) Formats (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    IEEE1451.2 std. ISO/IEC/IEEE Standard for Information technology Smart transducer interface for sensors and actuators. Part 2. Transducer to microprocessor communication protocols and Transducer Electronic Data Sheet (TEDS) formats, 1–130 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    IEEE1451.3 std. IEEE Standard for a Smart Transducer Interface for Sensors and Actuators-Digital Communication and Transducer Electronic Data Sheet (TEDS) Formats for Distributed Multidrop Systems, 1–175 (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    IEEE1451.4 std. IEEE Standard for a Smart Transducer Interface for Sensors and Actuators - Mixed-Mode Communication Protocols and Transducer Electronic Data Sheet (TEDS) Formats, 1–430 (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Izza, S.: Integration of industrial information systems: From syntactic to semantic integration approaches. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, 1–58 (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wobschall, D.: IEEE 1451- a universal transducer protocol standard. IEEE Autotestcon, 359–363 (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    IEEE1451.5 std. Standard for a Smart Transducer Interface for Sensors and Actuators Wireless Communication Protocols and Transducer Electronic Data Sheet (TEDS) Formats (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Raghunathan, V., Ganeriwal, S., Srivastava, M.: Emerging techniques for long lived wireless sensor networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 108–114 (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee, K., Song, E.: Wireless Sensor Network Based on IEEE 1451.0 and IEEE 1451.5-802.11. In: Conference on Electronic Measurement and Instruments, pp. 4–7 (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Song, E., Lee, K.: Sensor Network based on IEEE 1451.0 and IEEE p1451.2-RS232. In: Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, pp. 1728–1733 (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sweetser, D., Sweetser, V., Nemeth-Johannes, J.: Modular approach to IEEE-1451.5 wireless sensor development. In: Sensor Application Symposium, pp. 82–87 (2006)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    He, T., Krishnamurthy, S., Stankovic, J., Abdelzaher, T., Luo, L., Stoleru, R., et al.: Energy-efficient surveillance system using wireless sensor networks. In: ACM MobiSys, pp. 270–283 (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Seah, W., Zhi, A., Tan, H.-P.: Wireless sensor networks powered by ambient energy harvesting (WSN-HEAP) - Survey and challenges. In: 1st International Conference on Wireless Communication, Vehicular Technology, Information Theory and Aerospace & Electronic Systems Technology, pp. 1–5 (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    ZigBee Alliance. ZigBee Specification Document No. 053474r17 (2008)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Huebscher, M., McCann, J.: A survey of Autonomic Computing -Degrees, Models, and Applications. ACM Computing Surveys, 7–28 (2008)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Levis, P., Gay, D.: TinyOS programming. Cambridge University Press (2009)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kuorilehto, M., Kohvakka, M., Suhonen, J., Hämäläinen, P., Hännikäinen, M., Hamalainen, T.: Ultra-Low Energy Wireless Sensor Networks in Practice: Theory, Realization and Deployment. Wiley (2007)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Higuera, J., Polo, J., Gasulla, M.: A Zigbee wireless sensor network compliant with the IEEE1451 standard. In: IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium, pp. 309–313 (2009)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Higuera, J.E., Polo, J.: IEEE 1451 Standard in 6LoWPAN Sensor Networks Using a Compact Physical-Layer Transducer Electronic Datasheet. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 60(8), 2751–2758 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Orlanski, I.: A rational subdivision of scales for atmospheric processes. Bulletin American Meteorological Society, pp. 527–530 (1975)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hartung, C., Han, R., Seielstad, C., Holbrook, S.: FireWxNet: A MultiTiered Portable Wireless System for Monitoring Weather Conditions in Wildland Fire Environments. In: ACM 4th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications and Services, pp. 28–41 (2006)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Barrenetxea, G., Ingelrest, F., Schaefer, G., Vetterli, M.: The hitchhiker’s guide to successful wireless sensor network deployments. In: 6th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems, pp. 43–56 (2008)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chebrolu, K., Raman, B., Mishra, N., Valiveti, P., Kumar, R.: Brimon: a sensor network system for railway bridge monitoring. In: ACM MobiSys, pp. 2–14 (2008)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kim, S., Pakzad, S., Culler, D., Demmel, J., Fenves, G., Glaser, S., et al.: Health monitoring of civil infrastructures using wireless sensor networks. In: 6th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks IPSN, pp. 254–263 (2007)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    MEMSIC. Wireless Sensor Network platform TelosB Datasheet (2011), http://www.memsic.com/products/wireless-sensor-networks/wireless-modules.html
  36. 36.
    Werner-Allen, G., Lorincz, K., Johnson, J., Lees, J., Welsh, M.: Fidelity and yield in a volcano monitoring sensor network. In: 7th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, pp. 381–396 (2006)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tsai, W., Chen, H., Liao, T.: An ultrasonic air temperature measurement system with self-correction function for humidity. Measurement Science and Technology, 548–555 (2005)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
  39. 39.
    Cuerva, A., Sanz-Andrès, A.: On sonic anemometer measurement theory. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 25–55 (2000)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Milowski, A.: Poster Firefox extension, https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/2691/
  41. 41.
    Polastre, J., Hill, J., Culler, D.: Versatile low power media access for wireless sensor networks. In: ACM SenSys, pp. 95–107 (2004)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
  43. 43.
  44. 44.

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Higuera
    • 1
  • J. Polo
    • 1
  1. 1.Technical University of Catalonia UPC-BarcelonaTechCastelldefels, BarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations