Urban Emissions Monitoring at the Vehicle Level

  • L. E. Cordova-Lopez
  • A. Mason
  • A. Shaw
  • A. I. Al-Shamma’a

Abstract

Urban emissions have been considered an issue in the UK since as early as the 13th century, when the use of coal was banned in London because of the damaging effects to human health. Despite air quality improving in the last century, the establishment of legislative controls and limits, in addition to developments in sensing technology are helping to reduce further the pollutant levels present in the air. Technological advances, such as the emergence of Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs), and complex computer based tools may allow for both the capturing and analysis of data in order to address the issue of emissions from road transportation systems. This work delves into the possibility of remotely obtaining real-time emissions data at the vehicle level using a combination of WSNs and Geographical Information Systems (GISs). The paper adopts a design science research methodology, discussing the rationale for the novel approach taken and presenting empirical measurements from a vehicle to demonstrate the principle of the work.

Keywords

Wireless sensor network geographical information system vehicle pollution urban monitoring 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Eurostat: Energy consumption and the environment. In: Panorama of Transport, 6th edn., pp. 151–180. European Commission, Luxembourg (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lipman, T., Delucchi, M.: Emissions of Nitrous Oxide and Methane from Conventional and Alternative Fuel Motor Vehicles. Climatic Change 53, 477–516 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    I. o. C. Engineers,The State of the Nation 2005, ICE: Institution of Civil Engineers, London (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    UK Government, Vehicle Licensing Statistics: 2010, D. f. Transport, Ed., (April 2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Friedman, T.L.: The World is Flat. Farrar, Straus & Giroux (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. T. M. Bureau. Statistical Analysis on China’s Vehicles and Drivers in the First Half of 2009 (July 12, 2009), http://www.bjjtgl.gov.cn/publish/portal1/tab165/info12857.htm
  7. 7.
    BBC, Beijing ’plans congestion charge’ to ease traffic woes (September 2, 2011) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoek, G., et al.: Association between mortality and indicators of traffic-related air pollution in the Netherlands: a cohort study. The Lancet 360, 1203–1209 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Finkelstein, M.M., et al.: Traffic pollution and mortality rate advancement periods. American Journal of Epidemiology 160, 173–177 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Peters, A., et al.: Exposure to Traffic and the Onset of Myocardial Infarction. New England Journal of Medicine 351, 1721–1730 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tonne, C., et al.: A case-control analysis of exposure to traffic and acute myocardial infarction. Environment Health Perspectives 115, 53–57 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gauderman, W.J., et al.: Effect of exposure to traffic on lung development from 10 to 18 years of age: a cohort study. Lancet. 369, 571–577 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Künzli, N., et al.: Public-health impact of outdoor and traffic-related air pollution: a European assessment. Lancet. 356, 795–801 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    O’Neill, M.S., et al.: Health, Wealth, and Air Pollution: Advancing Theory and Methods. Environ. Health Perspect. 111 (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Senior Energy Official Group, New Zealand Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy, New Zealand (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    UK Government, Vehicle scrappage scheme (September 19, 2010), http://www.bis.gov.uk/policies/business-sectors/automotive/vehicle-scrappage-scheme
  17. 17.
    Nathan, S.: Car Plant. The Engineer (2008), http://www.theengineer.co.uk/in-depth/car-plant/307305.article
  18. 18.
    UK Government, DECC energy price statistics, Department of Energy and Climate Change, Ed., London (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Granovskii, M., et al.: Economic and environmental comparison of conventional, hybrid, electric and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. Journal of Power Sources 159, 1186–1193 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jorgensen, K.: Technologies for electric, hybrid and hydrogen vehicles: Electricity from renewable energy sources in transport. Utilities Policy 16, 72–79 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nissan. Charging the Nissan LEAF (September 19, 2011), http://www.nissan.co.uk/vehicles/electric-vehicles/electric-leaf/leaf.html
  22. 22.
    Fickl, S.: ECOWILL (September 19, 2002), http://www.ecodrive.org/
  23. 23.
    Scottish Government, Eco-driving campaign (September 19, 2007), http://www.scotland.gov.uk/News/Releases/2007/01/30145725
  24. 24.
    Auto Alliance, EcoDrivingUSA (September 19, 2011), http://www.ecodrivingusa.com/
  25. 25.
    The AA. EcoDriving Advice: How to get the most out of the fuel you buy (September 19, 2011), http://www.theaa.com/motoring_advice/fuels-and-environment/drive-smart.html
  26. 26.
    Jowitt, J.: Now drivers have to pass green test. The Observer ed. London (2006)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chin, A.: Containing air pollution and traffic congestion: Transport policy and the environment in Singapore. Atmospheric Environment 30, 787–801 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Foo, T.S.: An advanced demand management instrument in urban transport: Electronic road pricing in Singapore. Cities 17, 33–45 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Beevers, S.D., Carslaw, D.C.: The impact of congestion charging on vehicle emissions in London. Atmospheric Environment 39, 1–5 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Banister, D.: Critical pragmatism and congestion charging in London. International Social Science Journal 55, 249–264 (2003)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Daniel, J.I., Bekka, K.: The Environmental Impact of Highway Congestion Pricing. Journal of Urban Economics 47, 180–215 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tonne, C., et al.: Air pollution and mortality benefits of the London Congestion Charge: spatial and socioeconomic inequalities. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 65, 620–627 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Holmén, B.A., Niemeier, D.A.: Characterizing the effects of driver variability on real-world vehicle emissions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 3, 117–128 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Molnár, P., et al.: Roadside measurements of fine and ultrafine particles at a major road north of Gothenburg. Atmospheric Environment 36, 4115–4123 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Carslaw, D.C.: Evidence of an increasing NO2/NOX emissions ratio from road traffic emissions. Atmospheric Environment 39, 4793–4802 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Jiménez, J.L., et al.: Characterization of On-Road Vehicle NO Emissions by a TILDAS Remote Sensor. Air & Waste Management Association 49, 463–470 (1999)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Westerdahl, D., et al.: Characterization of on-road vehicle emission factors and microenvironmental air quality in Beijing, China. Atmospheric Environment 43, 697–705 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Vardoulakis, S., et al.: Model sensitivity and uncertainty analysis using roadside air quality measurements. Atmospheric Environment 36, 2121–2134 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Derwent, R.G., et al.: Analysis and interpretation of air quality data from an urban roadside location in Central London over the period from July 1991 to July 1992. Atmospheric Environment 29, 923–946 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Woo, A., et al.: Taming the Underlying Challenges of Reliable Multihop Routing in Sensor Networks. Presented at the Sensys 2003, Los Angeles, California (2003)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Andrews, J., et al.: Fundamentals of WiMAX: Understanding Broadband Wireless Networking, 1st edn. Prentice-Hall (2007)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Holmström, J., et al.: Bridging Practice and Theory: A Design Science Approach. Decision Sciences 40, 65–87 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gregor, S., Jones, D.: The Anatomy of a Design Theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8, 312–335 (2007)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Denning, P.J.: A new social contract for research. Commun. ACM 40, 132–134 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hevner, A.R., et al.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28, 75–105 (2004)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Crossbow: MPR/MIB Users Manual (2004), http://www.xbow.com/ (April 6, 2010)
  47. 47.
    May, K.: 9106 Quintox Upgradeable Combustion Analyser (September 19, 2003), http://www.keison.co.uk/kane_9106.shtml
  48. 48.
    Gerard, D., et al.: On-board monitoring of vehicle exhaust emissions using an ultraviolet optical fibre based sensor. Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics 9, 24 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Voss, W.: A Comprehensive Guide to Controller Area Network, 1st edn. Copperhill Media Corporation (2005)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Paret, D.: Multiplexed Networks for Embedded Systems, 1st edn. Wiley (2007)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Giordano, S.: Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. In: Handbook of Wireless Networks and Mobile Computing, pp. 325–346. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2002)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Basagni, S., et al.: Ad-Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing. In: Mobile Ad-hoc Networking, pp. 281–283. Wiley Interscience (2004)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    UK Government, Low Carbon Transport: A Greener Future, Department for Transport, Ed. Stationary House, London (2004) Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Begg, D., Gray, D.: Transport policy and vehicle emission objectives in the UK: is the marriage between transport and environment policy over? Environmental Science & Amp; Policy 7, 155–163 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    UK Government, The Future of Transport, A network for 2030. Department for Transport, Ed. Stationary House, London (2004)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hau, T.D.: Congestion Charging Mechanisms for Roads - An Evaluation of Current Practice. In: Infrastructure and Urban Development, 1st edn. The World Bank (1992)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. E. Cordova-Lopez
    • 1
  • A. Mason
    • 1
  • A. Shaw
    • 1
  • A. I. Al-Shamma’a
    • 1
  1. 1.Built Environment and Sustainable Technologies (BEST) Research InstituteLiverpool John Moores UniversityLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations