Understanding the Relationship of Information in Mechatronic Design Modeling

  • Peter Hehenberger
  • Alexander Egyed
  • Klaus Zeman
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6928)

Abstract

Understand the information flow during engineering processes of mechatronic systems is an important point for competitive mechatronic engineering. The paper gives an overview about product models used in mechatronic design and analyzes also the flow of information through tools. Furthermore, there is also the need for considering model consistency because if objects and models are independently created and maintained by the various disciplines then correctness is no longer guaranteed. The same is true for objects or models that are transferred from one discipline to another, from one abstraction level to another, or from one design phase to the next one – if such objects or models are subsequently modified on both ends just as proposed in simultaneous engineering.

Keywords

Mechatronic Design Product Model Change Propagation Information Flow 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    De Silva, C.W.: Mechatronics – an integrated approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Isermann, R.: Mechatronic systems. Fundamentals. Springer, London (2005)MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hehenberger, P., Zeman, K.: The role of hierarchical design models in the mechatronic product development process. In: Proceedings of TMCE International Symposium Series on Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering, Izmir, Turkey (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eckert, C.M., Zanker, W., Clarkson, P.J.: Aspects of a Better Understanding of Changes. In: Proceedings of the 13th Int. Conference on Engineering Design: Design Applications in Industry and Education, Glasgow, UK, pp. 147–154 (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jarratt, T.A.W., Eckert, C., Caldwell, N.H.M., Clarkson, P.J.: Engineering change: an overview and perspective on the literature. Res. Eng. Design (2010), doi:10.1007/s00163-010-0097-yGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Suh, E.S.: Flexible Product Platforms. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division, Cambridge, MA, USA, (2005) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Weck, O., Bounova, G., Keller, R., Eckert, C., Clarkson, P.J.: Change Propagation Analysis in Complex Technical Systems. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 131 (August 2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hehenberger, P., Egyed, A., Zeman, K.: Consistency checking of mechatronic design models. In: Proceedings of IDETC/CIE 2010, ASME 2010 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Paper-Nr. DETC2010-28615 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hehenberger, P., Poltschak, F., Zeman, K., Amrhein, W.: Hierarchical design models in the mechatronic product development process of synchronous machines. Mechatronics 20, 864–875 (2010); ISSN 0957-4158, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2010.04.00 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Egyed, A.: Automatically Detecting and Tracking Inconsistencies in Software Design Models. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (TSE) 37(2), 188–204 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Hehenberger
    • 1
  • Alexander Egyed
    • 2
  • Klaus Zeman
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Computer-Aided Methods in Mechanical EngineeringJohannes Kepler University LinzLinzAustria
  2. 2.Institute for Systems Engineering and AutomationJohannes Kepler University LinzLinzAustria

Personalised recommendations