Teaching with Minirobots: The Local Educational Laboratory on Robotics
In this paper, we are going to present and discuss a few activities related to the application of minirobots in school education. The activities have been carried out in the framework of the Local Educational Laboratory on Robotics (LELR), which has been developed by Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna (SSSA) in collaboration with local Municipalities (i.e. Valdera Union) and a network of primary and secondary schools (i.e. Costellazione Network) in the Valdera area of Tuscany, Italy. The LELR is part of SSSA efforts to actively participate in the scientific and technological education of young generations, starting from school age. The laboratory is based on the deployment of robotics, in its several manifestations. in teaching activities. Drawing on preliminary activities and experiences, the paper will report on and discuss a few projects about teaching with minirobots in primary and secondary schools education, pointing out the relevance of promoting an interdisciplinary approach to minirobots educational activities – namely not limited to scientific and technological subjects – as well as developing a critical attitude towards scientific and technological progress in students.
KeywordsHumanoid Robot School Subject Critical Attitude Robotic Technology Interdisciplinary Activity
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Papert, S.: Mindstorms. Children, Computers and Powerful Ideas. Basic books, New York (1980)Google Scholar
- 2.Martin, F., Mikhak, B., Resnick, M., Silverman, B., Berg, R.: To Mindstorms and Beyond: Evolution of a Construction Kit for Magical Machines. In: Robots for Kids: Exploring New Technologies for Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Series in Interactive Technologies, pp. 9–33 (2000)Google Scholar
- 3.Resnick, M., Ocko, S.: LEGO/Logo: Learning Through and About Design. In: Harel, I., Papert, S. (eds.) Constructionism. Ablex Publishing, Norwood (1991)Google Scholar
- 5.Resnick, M.: Technologies for Lifelong Kindergarten. Educational Technology Research & Development 46(4) (1998)Google Scholar
- 6.Kärn|ä-Lin, E., et al.: Technology in finnish special education: toward inclusion and harmonized school days. Informatics in Education 6(1), 103–114 (2007)Google Scholar
- 7.Bernardine Dias, M., Ayorkor Mills-Tettey, G., Mertz, J.: The TechBridge World Initiative: Broadening Perspectives in Computing Technology Education and Research. Robotics Institute School of Computer Science (January 1, 2005)Google Scholar
- 8.Pekárová, J.: Using a Programmable Toy at Preschool Age: Why and How? In: Intl. Conf. on Simulation, Modeling and Programming for Autonomous Robots Workshop Proceedings of SIMPAR 2008, Venice, Italy, November 3-4, pp. 112–121 (2008)Google Scholar
- 9.Rossi, S.: La Robotica educative nella scuola primaria. Master Degree Thesis, Scienze delle Formazione Primaria, Università degli Studi di Firenze (2007)Google Scholar
- 10.Arras, K.O., Cerqui, D.: Do we want to share our lives and bodies with robots? A 2000-people survey Technical Report Nr. 0605-001 Autonomous Systems Lab Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, EPFL (June 2005)Google Scholar
- 11.Manifesto on Creativity and Innovation (2009), http://ec.europa.eu/education/lifelong-learning-policy/doc/year09/manifesto_en.pdf