Integrated Product Design

Conference paper
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 403)

Introduction

The design of the late 1940’s automobile, the “Tucker 48”, is one of the most proclaimed cases of failure in the annals of American industry, after the World War II. With its Cyclops headlight which turned in tandem with the steering wheel, its rear-mounted engine, as well as its aerodynamic sheet metal, the Tucker 48 model, demonstrated to the public in 1947, produced much excitement. However, the Tucker 48 was never given to a factory for manufacturing. Only 51 cars were manufactured by hand, and they were all produced at enormous expense and manpower. Only the engineering characteristics such as car speed and efficiency of the engine were optimized or addressed by engineering personnel. Several important customer requirements such as low cost had not been considered. Existing equipment, commonly used car components and available engineering skills were inadequate for the large scale manufacture of the Tucker 48 with its relatively sophisticated design. It was hugely expensive to produce just one of them. These cars were so costly that they were beyond the means of the general public. Therefore, the development of Tucker 48 provides a valuable lesson that customer needs, marketing issue and engineering constraints need to be considered in product design stage.

Keywords

Customer Satisfaction Customer Requirement Quality Function Deployment Design Attribute Fuzzy Regression 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Askin, R.G., Dawson, D.W.: Maximizing customer satisfaction by optimal specification of engineering characteristics. IIE Transactions 32(1), 9–20 (2000)Google Scholar
  2. Babets, K., Geskin, E.S.: Application of fuzzy logic for modeling of waterjet depainting. Machining Science and Technology 4(1), 81–100 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bossert, J.L.: Quality Function Deployment, A Practitioner’s Approach. ASQC Quality Press, Milwaukee (1991)Google Scholar
  4. Chang, Y.H.O., Ayyub, B.M.: Fuzzy regression methods – a comparative assessment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 119, 187–203 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, Y.: Fuzzy regression-based mathematical programming model for quality function deployment. International Journal of Production Research 42(5), 1009–1027 (2004)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, D.X.: Modeling and off-line control of fluid dispensing for electronics packaging. PhD thesis, University of Saskatchewan (2002)Google Scholar
  7. Chen, C.H., Khoo, L.P., Yan, W.: An investigation into affective design using sorting technique and Kohonen self-organizing map. Advances in Engineering Software 37(5), 334–349 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiang, H.H., Hieber, C.A., Wang, K.K.: A unified simulation of the filling and postfilling stages in injection molding, Part 1: formulation. Polymer Engineering and Science 31, 116–124 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chuang, M.C., Ma, Y.C.: Expressing the expected product images in product design of micro-electronic products. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 27(4), 233–245 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dawson, D., Askin, R.G.: Optimal new product design using quality function deployment with empirical value functions. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 15(1), 17–32 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dillon, T.S., Chen, W., Chang, E.: An abstract layered model for Web-inclusive distributed computing leading to enhancing GRIDSpace with Web 2.0. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 21(5), 605–634 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, Y., Chen, L.: A non-linear possibilistic regression approach to model functional relationships in product planning. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 28(11-12), 1175–1181 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clausing, D., Hauser, J.: The house of quality. Harvard Business Review 66(3), 63–73 (1988)Google Scholar
  14. Cohen, L.: Quality Function Deployment. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1995)Google Scholar
  15. Crawford, M., Benedetto, A.: New products Management. McGraw-Hill (2003)Google Scholar
  16. Fung, R.Y.K., Chen, Y.Z., Tang, J.F.: Estimating the functional relationships for quality function deployment under uncertainties. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 157(1), 98–120 (2006)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grigoroudis, E., Siskos, Y.: Preference disaggregation for measuring and analyzing customer satisfaction: the MUSA method. European Journal of Operational Research 143(1), 148–170 (2002)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Griffin, A., Hauser, J.R.: The voice of the customer. Marketing Science 12(1), 1–27 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Han, R., Shi, L., Gupta, M.: Three-dimensional simulation of microchip encapsulation process. Polymer Engineering and Science 40(3), 776–785 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Han, S.H., Hong, S.W.: A systematic approach for computing user satisfaction with product design. Ergonomics 46(13), 1441–1461 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hsiao, S.W., Tsai, H.C.: Applying a hybrid approach based on fuzzy neural network and genetic algorithm to product form design. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 35(5), 411–428 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ip, C.K.W., Kwong, C.K., Bai, H., Tsim, Y.C.: The process modeling of epoxy dispensing for microchip encapsulation using fuzzy linear regression with fuzzy intervals. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 22, 417–423 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson, R.A., Wichern, D.W.: Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1992)MATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Kang, S.Y., Xie, H., Lee, Y.C.: Physical and fuzzy logic modeling of a flip-chip thermo-compression bonding process. Journal of Electronic Packaging 115, 63–70 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kano, N.: Attractive quality and must-be quality. The Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control 14(2), 39–48 (1984)Google Scholar
  26. Kim, K., Park, T.: Determination of an optimal set of design requirements using house of quality. Journal of Operations Management 16(5), 569–581 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kwong, C.K., Bai, H.: Fuzzy Regression Approach to Process Modelingand Optimization of Epoxy Dispensing. International Journal of Production Research 43(12), 2359–2375 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Koza, J.: Genetic Programming II: automatic discovery of reusable programs. MIT Press (1994)Google Scholar
  29. Kuang, J., Jiang, P.: Product platform design for a product family based on Kansei engineering. Journal of Engineering Design 20(6), 589–607 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lai, Y.J., Chang, S.I.: A fuzzy approach for Multiresponse optimization: an off-line quality engineering problem. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 63, 117–129 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lakshminarayanan, S., Fujii, H., Grosman, B., Dassau, E., Lewin, D.R.: New product design via analysis of historical databases. Computers and Chemical Engineering 24, 671–676 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Li, H.X., Tso, S.K., Deng, H.: A concept approach to integrate design and control for the epoxy dispensing process. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 17, 677–682 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li, H.L., Chou, T., Chou, C.P.: Optimization of resistance spot welding process using Taguchi method and a neural network. Experimental Techniques 31(5), 30–36 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lin, Y.C., Lai, H.H., Yeh, C.H.: Consumer-oriented product form design based on fuzzy logic: a case study of mobile phones. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 37(6), 531–543 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Liu, X.: A fuzzy model for customer satisfaction index in e-commerce. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 77(5-6), 512–521 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Madar, J., Abonyi, J., Szeifert, F.: Genetic programming for the identification of nonlinear input – output models. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 44, 3178–3186 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Park, J., Han, S.H.: A fuzzy rule-based approach to modeling affective user satisfaction towards office chair design. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 34(1), 31–47 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schaiable, B., Lee, Y.C.: Fuzzy logic based regression models for electronics manufacturing applications. Advances in Electronic Packaging 1, 147–155 (1997)Google Scholar
  39. Seber, G.A.F.: Linear regression analysis. Wiley (2003)Google Scholar
  40. Simpson, P.K.: Artificial neural systems. Pergamon Press, New York (1989)Google Scholar
  41. Sullivan, L.P.: Quality function deployment. Quality Progress 19(6), 39–50 (1986)Google Scholar
  42. Takagi, T., Sugeno, M.: Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modeling and control. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 15(1), 116–132 (1985)MATHGoogle Scholar
  43. Tanaka, H., Uejima, S., Asai, K.: Linear regression analysis with fuzzy model. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 12, 903–907 (1982)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tanaka, H., Watada, J.: Possibilistic linear systems and their application to the linear regression model. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 272, 275–289 (1988)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tong, K.W., Kwong, C.K., Yu, K.M.: Intelligent process design system for the transfer moulding of electronic packages. International Journal of Production Research 42(10), 1911–1931 (2004)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Xie, H., Lee, Y.C.: Process optimization using a fuzzy logic response surface method. IEEE Transactions on Components Packaging and Manufacturing Technology – Part A 17(2), 202–210 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yoder, B., Mason, D.: Evaluating QFD relationships relationships through the use of regression analysis. In: Seventh Symposium on Quality Function Deployment, ASI & GOAL/QPC, pp. 35–59 (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kit Yan Chan
    • 1
  • C. K. Kwong
    • 2
  • Tharam S. Dillon
    • 1
  1. 1.Digital Ecosystems and BusinessCurtin University of TechnologyPerthAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Industrial and SystemsThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityKowloonHong Kong SAR

Personalised recommendations