Fabric-Like Visualization of Tensor Field Data on Arbitrary Surfaces in Image Space

  • Sebastian Eichelbaum
  • Mario Hlawitschka
  • Bernd Hamann
  • Gerik Scheuermann
Conference paper
Part of the Mathematics and Visualization book series (MATHVISUAL)


Tensors are of great interest to many applications in engineering and in medical imaging, but a proper analysis and visualization remains challenging. It already has been shown that, by employing the metaphor of a fabric structure, tensor data can be visualized precisely on surfaces where the two eigendirections in the plane are illustrated as thread-like structures. This leads to a continuous visualization of most salient features of the tensor data set. We introduce a novel approach to compute such a visualization from tensor field data that is motivated by image space line integral convolution (LIC). Although our approach can be applied to arbitrary, non-self-intersecting surfaces, the main focus lies on special surfaces following important features, such as surfaces aligned to the neural pathways in the human brain. By adding a postprocessing step, we are able to enhance the visual quality of the results, which improves perception of the major patterns.


Fractional Anisotropy Image Space Tensor Field Current Pixel Projection Step 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We thank Alfred Anwander and Thomas R. Knösche from the Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany, for providing the human brain image data sets, and for fruitful discussions and comments, and Boris Jeremić, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UC Davis, for providing the earthquake data set. We thank the members of the Visualization and Computer Graphics Research Group of the Institute for Data Analysis and Visualization, Department of Computer Science, UC Davis, and the members of the Abteilung für Bild- und Signalverarbeitung des Instituts für Informatik der Universität Leipzig, Germany.

This work has been supported in part by NSF grant CCF-0702817.


  1. 1.
    Anwander, A., Schurade, R., Hlawitschka, M., Scheuermann, G., Knösche, T.: White matter imaging with virtual klingler dissection. NeuroImage 47(Suppl. 1), S105–S105 (2009). doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(09)70916-4. Organization for Human Brain Mapping 2009 Annual MeetingGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blinn, J.F.: Models of light reflection for computer synthesized pictures. In: SIGGRAPH ’77: Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp. 192–198. ACM, New York (1977). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/563858.563893
  3. 3.
    Blinn, J.F.: Simulation of wrinkled surfaces. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. 12(3), 286–292 (1978). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/965139.507101
  4. 4.
    Cabral, B., Leedom, L.C.: Imaging vector fields using line integral convolution. In: SIGGRAPH ’93: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp. 263–270. ACM, New York (1993). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/166117.166151
  5. 5.
    Chu, A., Chan, W.Y., Guo, J., Pang, W.M., Heng, P.A.: Perception-aware depth cueing for illustrative vascular visualization. In: BMEI ’08: Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on BioMedical Engineering and Informatics, pp. 341–346. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/BMEI.2008.347
  6. 6.
    Delmarcelle, T., Hesselink, L.: Visualization of second order tensor fields and matrix data. In: VIS ’92: Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Visualization ’92, pp. 316–323. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1992)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dick, C., Georgii, J., Burgkart, R., Westermann, R.: Stress tensor field visualization for implant planning in orthopedics. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 15(6), 1399–1406 (2009). http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/TVCG.2009.184 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Enders, F., Sauber, N., Merhof, D., Hastreiter, P., Nimsky, C., Stamminger, M.: Visualization of white matter tracts with wrapped streamlines. In: Silva, C.T., Gröller, E., Rushmeier, H. (eds.) Proceedings of IEEE Visualization 2005, pp. 51–58. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grabner, M., Laramee, R.S.: Image space advection on graphics hardware. In: SCCG ’05: Proceedings of the 21st Spring Conference on Computer Graphics, pp. 77–84. ACM, New York (2005). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1090122.1090136
  10. 10.
    Hasan, K.M., Basser, P.J., Parker, D.L., Alexander, A.L.: Analytical computation of the eigenvalues and eigenvectors in DT-MRI. J. Magn. Reson. 152(1), 41–47 (2001). doi:10.1006/ jmre.2001.2400Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hesselink, L., Levy, Y., Lavin, Y.: The topology of symmetric, second-order 3d tensor fields. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 3(1), 1–11 (1997). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/2945.582332 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hlawitschka, M., Garth, C., Tricoche, X., Kindlmann, G., Scheuermann, G., Joy, K.I., Hamann, B.: Direct visualization of fiber information by coherence. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, CARS, CUARC.08 Special Issue. 5(2), 125–131 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hotz, I., Feng, L., Hagen, H., Hamann, B., Joy, K., Jeremic, B.: Physically based methods for tensor field visualization. In: VIS ’04: Proceedings of the Conference on Visualization ’04, pp. 123–130. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/VIS.2004.80
  14. 14.
    Hotz, I., Feng, Z.X., Hamann, B., Joy, K.I.: Tensor field visualization using a fabric-like texture on arbitrary two-dimensional surfaces. In: Möller, T., Hamann, B., Russel, R.D. (eds.) Mathematical Foundations of Scientific Visualization, Computer Graphics, and Massive Data Exploration. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Iwakiri, Y., Omori, Y., Kanko, T.: Practical texture mapping on free-form surfaces. In: PG ’00: Proceedings of the 8th Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications, p. 97. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2000)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Knoll, A., Hijazi, Y., Hansen, C., Wald, I., Hagen, H.: Interactive ray tracing of arbitrary implicits with simd interval arithmetic. In: RT ’07: Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Symposium on Interactive Ray Tracing, pp. 11–18. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/RT.2007.4342585
  17. 17.
    Laramee, R.S., Jobard, B., Hauser, H.: Image space based visualization of unsteady flow on surfaces. In: VIS ’03: Proceedings of the 14th IEEE Visualization 2003 (VIS’03), p. 18. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/VISUAL.2003.1250364
  18. 18.
    Merhof, D., Sonntag, M., Enders, F., Nimsky, C., Hastreiter, P., Greiner, G.: Hybrid visualization for white matter tracts using triangle strips and point sprites. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 12(5), 1181–1188 (2006). http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/TVCG.2006.151 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Purnomo, B., Cohen, J.D., Kumar, S.: Seamless texture atlases. In: SGP ’04: Proceedings of the 2004 Eurographics/ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on Geometry Processing, pp. 65–74. ACM, New York (2004). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1057432.1057441
  20. 20.
    Schirski, M., Kuhlen, T., Hopp, M., Adomeit, P., Pischinger, S., Bischof, C.: Virtual tubelets-efficiently visualizing large amounts of particle trajectories. Comput. Graph. 29(1), 17–27 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2004.11.004 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schultz, T., Seidel, H.P.: Estimating crossing fibers: a tensor decomposition approach. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Grap. 14(6), 1635–1642 (2008). http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/TVCG.2008.128 Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tricoche, X., Scheuermann, G., Hagen, H.: Tensor topology tracking: a visualization method for time-dependent 2D symmetric tensor fields. In: Eurographics 2001 Proceedings, Computer Graphics Forum 20(3), 461–470. The Eurographics Association, Saarbrücken (2001). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8659.00539
  23. 23.
    Tricoche, X.: Vector and tensor field topology simplification, tracking, and visualization. Ph.D. thesis, University of Kaiserslautern (2002)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Turing, A.: The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 237(641), 37–72 (1952)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Turk, G.: Generating textures on arbitrary surfaces using reaction-diffusion. In: SIGGRAPH ’91: Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp. 289–298. ACM, New York (1991). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/122718.122749
  26. 26.
    Weiskopf, D., Ertl, T.: A hybrid physical/device-space approach for spatio-temporally coherent interactive texture advection on curved surfaces. In: GI ’04: Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2004, pp. 263–270. Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society, School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo (2004)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    van Wijk, J.J.: Image based flow visualization. In: SIGGRAPH ’02: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp. 745–754. ACM, New York (2002). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/566570.566646
  28. 28.
    van Wijk, J.J.: Image based flow visualization for curved surfaces. In: VIS ’03: Proceedings of the 14th IEEE Visualization 2003 (VIS’03), p. 17. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/VISUAL.2003.1250363
  29. 29.
    Zhang, S., Demiralp, C., Laidlaw, D.H.: Visualizing diffusion tensor mr images using streamtubes and streamsurfaces. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 9(4), 454–462 (2003). http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/TVCG.2003.1260740 Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhang, E., Hays, J., Turk, G.: Interactive tensor field design and visualization on surfaces. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 13(1), 94–107 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2007.16 Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zheng, X., Pang, A.: Hyperlic. In: VIS ’03: Proceedings of the 14th IEEE Visualization 2003 (VIS’03), p. 33. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/VISUAL.2003.1250379

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sebastian Eichelbaum
    • 1
  • Mario Hlawitschka
    • 2
  • Bernd Hamann
    • 3
  • Gerik Scheuermann
    • 1
  1. 1.Abteilung für Bild- und Signalverarbeitung, Institut für InformatikUniversität LeipzigLeipzigGermany
  2. 2.Scientific Visualization Group, Institut für InformatikUniversität LeipzigLeipzigGermany
  3. 3.Department of Computer Science, Institute for Data Analysis and Visualization (IDAV)University of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations