A Practical Methodology for Development of a Network of e-Government Domain Ontologies

  • Hele-Mai Haav
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 353)


Ontologies are widely proposed for solving semantic interoperability problems in e-government domain. However, less attention is paid on methodological issues of ontology development in this domain. These are not sufficiently solved. Existing approaches in ontology development are technically very demanding and require long learning curve and are therefore inefficient for this purpose. E-government domain ontologies could be efficiently developed by domain experts rather than ontology engineers. The paper proposes a novel ontology development methodology for construction of light-weight domain ontologies by bringing ontology modeling closer to domain experts that are actual domain knowledge holders. The approach is illustrated and evaluated by development of a network of e-government domain ontologies used for achieving semantic interoperability of state information systems (IS) in Estonia.


ontology ontology networks ontology development methodology e-government 


  1. 1.
    Barzdins, J., Barzdins, G., Balodis, R., Cerans, K., Kalnins, A., Opmanis, M., Podnieks, K.: Towards Semantic Latvia. In: Proceedings of Communications of 7th International Baltic Conference on Databases and Information Systems, Vilnius, Lithuania, pp. 203–218 (2006),
  2. 2.
    Bednár, P., Furdík, K., Paralič, M., Sabol, T., Skokan, M.: Semantic Integration of Government Services - the Access-eGov Approach. In: Cunningham, P., Cunningham, M. (eds.) Collaboration and the Knowledge Economy: Issues, Applications, Case Studies. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Georgiadis, P., Lepouras, G., Vassilakis, C., Boukis, G., Tambouris, T., Gorilas, S., Davenport, E., Macintosh, A., Fraser, J., Lochhead, D.: SmartGov: A Knowledge-based Platform for Transactional Electronic Services. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernández-López, M., Corcho, O.: Ontological Engineering with examples from the areas of Knowledge Management, e-Commerce and the Semantic Web. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haase, P., Rudolph, S., et al.: NeOn Deliverable D1.1.1 Networked Ontology Model (November 2006),
  6. 6.
    Haav, H.-M., Kalja, A., Küngas, P., Luts, M.: Ensuring Large-Scale Semantic Interoperability: The Estonian Public Sector’s Case Study. In: Haav, H.-M., Kalja, A. (eds.) Databases and Information Systems V, pp. 117–129. IOS Press (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hyvönen, E., Viljanen, K., Tuominen, J., Seppälä, K.: Building a National Semantic Web Ontology and Ontology Service Infrastructure –The FinnONTO Approach. In: Bechhofer, S., Hauswirth, M., Hoffmann, J., Koubarakis, M. (eds.) ESWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5021, pp. 95–109. Springer, Heidelberg (2008), http://www.seco.tkk/publications/2008/hyvonen-et-al-building-2008.pdf CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    IEEE Standard for Developing Software Life Cycle Processes. IEEE Std 1074-1997Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kalja, A.: New version of the x-road. In: Information Society Yearbook 2009, Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications of Estonia, Department of State Information Systems (RISO), Tallinn (2010),
  10. 10.
    Lavbiĉ, D., Krisper, M.: Rapid Ontology Development. In: Welzer Druzovec, T., et al. (eds.) Proceeding of the 2010 Conference on Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases XXI, pp. 283–290. IOS Press (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Loutas, N., Tarabanis, V.P.: Providing public services to citizens at the national and pan-european level using semantic web technologies. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Eastern European eGov Days, Czech Republic (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Parmakson, P., Vegmann, E.: The administration system of the state information system (RIHA). In: Information Society Yearbook 2009, Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications of Estonia, Department of State Information Systems (RISO), Tallinn (2010),
  13. 13.
    Staab, S., Schnurr, H.P., Studer, R., Sure, Y.: Knowledge Processes and Ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16(1), 26–34 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stojanovic, L., Kavadias, G., Apostolou, D., Probst, F., Hinkelmann, K.: Ontology-enabled e-Gov Service Configuration, Deliverable Ontogov Project - IST Project 507237,
  15. 15.
    Tomingas, K., Luts, M.: Semantic Interoperability Framework for Estonian Public Sector’s E-Services Integration. In: d’Aquin, M., García Castro, A., Lange, C., Viljanen, K. (eds.) ESWC 2010/ORES 2010 Proceedings of the First Workshop on Ontology Repositories and Editors for the Semantic Web (ORES 2010) 7th Extended Semantic Web Conference Hersonissos, Crete, Greece (May/June 2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Uschold, M., Grueninger, M.: Ontologies: principles, methods and applications. Knowledge Sharing and Review 11 (1996)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhou, L., Booker, Q., Zhang, D.: Toward Rapid Ontology Development for Underdeveloped Domains. In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2002), vol. 4, pp. 106–115 (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hele-Mai Haav
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Cybernetics at Tallinn University of TechnologyTallinnEstonia

Personalised recommendations