Effects of Social and Emotional Intelligence on the Creative Process and Individual Creativity

  • Min Hee Hahn
  • Do Young Choi
  • Kun Chang Lee
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 264)

Abstract

This study proposes an individual creativity model that consists of personal psychological characteristics and creative processes. We argue that social intelligence and emotional intelligence, as personal psychological characteristics, significantly influence creativity, and analyze how they are related to the creative process and individual creativity. We assume that the creative process includes both exploitation and exploration, where exploitation is considered an existing use of the solution and exploration is believed to aid in the development of new solutions. Using a structural equation model to analyze 447 valid questionnaires collected from employees in the Korean IT industry, we find that the creative process and individual creativity are reinforced by high levels of social and emotional intelligence. Another interesting finding is that exploration reinforces individual creativity, while exploitation does not directly strengthen individual creativity ual creativity, Exploration, Exploitation, Social intelligence, Emotional intelligence.

Keywords

Partial Little Square Emotional Intelligence Creative Process Social Intelligence Average Variance Extract 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Audia, P.G., Goncalo, J.A.: Past success and creativity over time: A study of inventors in the hard disk drice industry. Management Science 52(1), 1–15 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barchard, K.A.: Emotional and social Intelligence: Examing its place in the nomological network. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of British Columbia (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chin, W.W.: The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling. In: Marcoulides, G.A. (ed.) Modern Methods for Business Research 1998, pp. 295–336. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, NJ (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ciarrochi, J., Forgas, J., Mayer, J. (eds.): Emotional intelligence in everyday life: A Scientific Inquiry, vol. 1, pp. 157–188. Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia, PA (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davies, M., Stankov, L., Roberts, R.D.: Emotional intelligence: In search of an elusive construct. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75, 989–1015 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fabio, S.: Leadership in Education: Effective UK College Principals. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 14(2), 171–189 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gilson, L.L., Shalley, C.E.: What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly 15, 33–53 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goleman, D.: Emotional Intelligence. Bantam Books, NY (1995)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goleman, D.: Social Intelligence: The New Science of Human Relationships. Bantam Books, NY (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guilford, J.P.: Creativity. American Psychologist 5, 444–454 (1950)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guilford, J.P.: The natured of human intelligence. McGraw-Hill, NY (1967)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    He, Z.L., Wong, P.K.: Exploration vs Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis. Organization Science 15, 81–94 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Isen, A.M., Daubman, K.A., Nowicki, G.P.: Positive Affect Facilitates Creative Problem Solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychological 52, 122–131 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Levinthal, D.A., March, J.G.: The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal 14, 95–112 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    March, J.G.: Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2, 71–87 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nerkar, A.: Old is good? The value of temporal exploration in the creation of new knowledge. Management Science 49, 211–229 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Salovey, P., Mayer, J.D.: Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality 9(3), 185–211 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sosik, J.J., Kahai, S.S., Avolio, B.J.: Leadership style, anonymity, and creativity in group decision support systems: The mediating role of optimal flow. Journal of Creative Behavior 33, 227–256 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thorndike, E.L.: Intelligence and Its Uses. Harpers Magazine 140, 227–235 (1920)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wong, C.M.T., Day, J.D., Maxwell, S.E., Meara, N.M.: A Multitrait-Multimethod Study of Academic and Social Intelligence in College Students. Journal of Educational Psychology 87, 117–133 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wong, C.S., Law, K.S.: The effects of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude: An exploratory study. The Leadership Quarterly 13, 243–274 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Min Hee Hahn
    • 1
  • Do Young Choi
    • 2
  • Kun Chang Lee
    • 3
  1. 1.SKK Business SchoolSungkyunkwan UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Solution Business Unit, LG CNS Co., LtdSeoulRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Professor at SKK Business School, WCU Professor at Department of Interaction Science, Sungkyunkwan UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations