Agents for Cloud Resource Allocation: An Amazon EC2 Case Study

  • J. Octavio Gutierrez-Garcia
  • Kwang Mong Sim
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 261)

Abstract

Infrastructure-as-a-service consumers are presented with numerous Cloud providers with a wide variety of resources. However, consumers are faced with providers that may offer (even similar) resources at different hourly cost rates, and also that no single provider may have matching resource capabilities to fulfill a highly heterogeneous set of requirements. This work proposes an agent-based approach endowed with the well-known contract net protocol for allocating heterogeneous resources from multiple Cloud providers while selecting the most economical resources. The contributions of this paper are: (i) devising an agent-based architecture for resource allocation in multi-Cloud environments, and (ii) implementing the agent-based Cloud resource allocation mechanism in commercial Clouds using Amazon EC2 as a case study. The Amazon EC2 case study shows that agents can autonomously select and allocate heterogeneous resources from multiple Cloud providers while dynamically sampling resources’ allocation cost for selecting the most economical resources.

Keywords

agent-based Cloud computing Cloud computing multi-agent systems resource allocation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2), http://aws.amazon.com/ec2
  4. 4.
    Asmild, M., Paradi, J.C., Pastor, J.T.: Centralized Resource Allocation BCC Models. Omega 37(1), 40–49 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    AWS SDK for Java – A Java Library for Amazon S3, Amazon EC2, and More, http://aws.amazon.com/sdkforjava
  6. 6.
    Bellifemine, F., Poggi, A., Rimassa, G.: JADE - A FIPA-Compliant Agent Framework. In: 4th International Conference and Exhibition on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agents, pp. 97–108 (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bouncy Castle Crypto APIs, http://www.bouncycastle.org
  8. 8.
    Buyya, R., Pandey, S., Vecchiola, C.: Cloudbus Toolkit for Market-Oriented Cloud Computing. In: Jaatun, M.G., Zhao, G., Rong, C. (eds.) Cloud Computing. LNCS, vol. 5931, pp. 24–44. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Lee, K., Paton, N.W., Sakellariou, R., Deelman, E., Fernandes, A.A.A., Metha, G.: Adaptive Workflow Processing and Execution in Pegasus. Concurr. Comput.: Pract. Exper. 21(16), 1965–1981 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Sim, K.M.: A Survey of Bargaining Models for Grid Resource Allocation. SIGecom Exch. 5(5), 22–32 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smith, R.G.: The Contract Net Protocol: High-Level Communication and Control in a Distributed Problem Solver. IEEE Trans. Comput. 29(12), 1104–1113 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yang, Y., Liu, K., Chen, J., Lignier, J., Jin, H.: Peer-to-peer Based Grid Workflow Runtime Environment of SwinDeW-G. In: 3rd IEEE International Conference on e-Science and Grid Computing, pp. 51–58. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Octavio Gutierrez-Garcia
    • 1
  • Kwang Mong Sim
    • 1
  1. 1.Gwangju Institute of Science and TechnologyGwangjuRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations