Comparative Performance Study of Genetic Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization Applied on Off-grid Renewable Hybrid Energy System

  • Bhimsen Tudu
  • Sibsankar Majumder
  • Kamal K. Mandal
  • Niladri Chakraborty
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7076)

Abstract

This paper focuses on unit sizing of stand-alone hybrid energy system using Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and comparative performance study of these two meta-heuristic techniques on hybrid energy system. The hybrid system is designed focusing on the viability and combining different renewable energy sources like wind turbines, solar panels along with micro-hydro plant as well as fuel cells to compensate the deficit generation in different hours. Apart from the non-conventional sources, the system has been optimized with converters, electrolyzers and hydrogen tanks. Net present cost (NPC), cost of energy (COE) and generation cost (GC) for power generation have been considered while optimal unit sizing of the system are performed. Feasibility of the system is made based on net present cost (NPC). The performances of two algorithms have been checked for different values of variants of the respective algorithms and a comparative study has been carried out based on number of iterations taken to find optimal solution, CPU utilization time and also quality of solutions. The comparative analysis shows that the Particle Swarm Optimization technique performs better than Genetic Algorithm when applied for the sizing problem.

Keywords

Genetic Algorithm Particle Swarm Optimization Off-grid renewable energy system Solar panels Wind turbine Micro-hydro plant 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    BP Statistical Review of World Energy (June 2011), http://www.bp.com
  2. 2.
    Koutroulis, E., Kolokotsa, D., Potirakis, A., Kostas, K.: Methodology for optimal sizing of stand-alone photovoltaic/wind-generator systems using genetic algorithms. Solar Energy 80, 1072–1088 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dufo-Lopez, R., Bernal-Agustin, J.L.: Design and control strategies of PV-Diesel systems using genetic algorithms. Solar Energy 79, 33–46 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ould Bilal, B., Sambou, V., Ndiaye, P.A., Kebe, C.M.F., Ndongo, M.: Optimal design of a hybrid solar-wind-battery system using the minimization of the annualized cost system and minimization of the loss of power supply probability (LPSP). Technical note, Renewable Energy 35, 2388–2390 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hakimi, S.M., Moghaddas-Tafreshi, S.M.: Optimal sizing of a stand-alone hybrid power system via particle swarm optimization for Kahnouj area in south-east of Iran. Renewable Energy 34, 1855–1862 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hakimi, S.M., Tafreshi, S.M., Kashefi, A.: Unit sizing of a stand-alone hybrid power system using particle swarm optimization (PSO). In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics, Jinan, China, August 18-21 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hakimi, S.M., Tafreshi, S.M., Rajati, M.R.: Unit sizing of a stand-alone hybrid power system using model free optimization. In: 2007 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li, M., Wang, C.: Research on optimization of wind and PV hybrid power systems. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, Chongqing, China, June 25-27 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Qi, Y., Jianhua, Z., Zifa, L., Shu, X., Weiguo, L.: A new methodology for optimizing the size of hybrid PV/wind system. In: ICSET (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xu, D., Kang, L., Cao, B.: Graph-Based Ant System for Optimal Sizing of Standalone Hybrid Wind/PV Power Systems. In: Huang, D.-S., Li, K., Irwin, G.W. (eds.) ICIC 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4114, pp. 1136–1146. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Katsigiannis, Y.A., Georgilakis, P.S.: Optimal sizing of small isolated hybrid power systems using tabu search. Journal of Optoelectronics and Advanced Materials 10(5), 1241–1245 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dufo-Lopez, R., Bernal-Agustin, J.L.: Design and control strategies of PV-Diesel systems using genetic algorithms. Solar Energy 79, 33–46 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Katsigiannis, Y.A., Georgilakis, P.S., Karapidakis, E.S.: Genetic Algorithm Solution to Optimal Sizing Problem of Small Autonomous Hybrid Power Systems. In: Konstantopoulos, S., Perantonis, S., Karkaletsis, V., Spyropoulos, C.D., Vouros, G. (eds.) SETN 2010. LNCS, vol. 6040, pp. 327–332. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R.: Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks IV, pp. 1942–1948 (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bhimsen Tudu
    • 1
  • Sibsankar Majumder
    • 1
  • Kamal K. Mandal
    • 1
  • Niladri Chakraborty
    • 1
  1. 1.Power Engineering DepartmentJadavpur UniversityKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations