Article 16: Preferential Treatment for Developing Countries

  • Xavier Troussard
  • Valérie Panis-Cendrowicz
  • Julien Guerrier
Chapter

Abstract

Protecting and promoting of the diversity of cultural expressions means creating the conditions for people to access, wherever they are, both their own cultural expressions and the expressions coming from all parts of the world. A key challenge for cultural policies and international cooperation is to facilitate cultural exchanges and effectively improve the accessibility of cultural goods and services from each State’s territory, while maintaining the capacity to develop and implement public policies which favour the diversity of cultural expressions. For developing countries and their cultural goods and services, the weaknesses of their local cultural industries aggravate their general difficulty in entering the markets of developed countries.

Keywords

Preferential Treatment Cultural Exchange Cultural Good Cultural Industry Cultural Expression 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bourcieu, E. (2008). Preferential treatment for developing countries in the field of culture: The case of the EU. Experts’ reports on preferential treatment for developing countries (Article 16 of the Convention) CE/08/2.IGC/8 (Intergovernmental Committee Session of 8-12 december 2008) http://www.unesco.org/new/en/culture/themes/cultural-diversity/diversity-of-cultural-expressions/meetings/intergovernmental-committee/sessions/2igc/
  2. Hahn, M. (2007). The Convention on cultural diversity and international economic law. Asian Journal of WTO and International Health Law and Policy, 2(2), 229–265.Google Scholar
  3. Neil, G. (2006). The Convention as a response to the cultural challenges of economic globalisation. In N. Obuljen, & J. Smiers (Eds.), UNESCO’s Convention on the Protection and the Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions: Making it work (pp. 39–70). Zagreb: Institute for International Relations. http://www.culturelink.org/publics/joint/diversity01/Obuljen_Unesco_Diversity.pdf.
  4. Nurse, K. (2007). The cultural industries in CARICOM: Trade and development challenges. Report prepared for the Caribbean Regional Negotiating Machinery. http://www.creativeindustriesexchange.com/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_details&gid=3&Itemid=99999999.
  5. Sauvé, P., & Ward, N. (2009). The EC-Cariforum Economic Partnership Agreement: Assessing the outcome on services and investment. http://ctrc.sice.oas.org/trc/Articles/EC-CARIFORUMEconomicPartnershipAgreement.pdf.
  6. Singh, J. P. (2007). Culture or commerce? A comparative assessment of international interactions and developing countries at UNESCO, WTO, and beyond. International Studies Perspectives, 8(1), 36–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Smith, E. K., & Marshall, A. Y. (2006). Trade liberalisation and the cultural industries sector in Barbados in light of the negotiations for the CARIFORUM European Economic Partnership Agreement. http://www.tradeteam.bb/cms/pstt/files/tradeupdates/Trade%20Liberalisation%20and%20the%20Cultural%20Industries%20Sector%20in%20Barbados%20in%20Light%20of%20Negotiations%20for%20the%20CARIFORUM%20European%20Economic%20Partnership%20Agreement.pdf.
  8. van den Bossche, P. (2007). Free trade and culture: A study of relevant WTO rules and constraints on national cultural policy measures. Amsterdam: Boekmanstudies.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xavier Troussard
    • 1
  • Valérie Panis-Cendrowicz
    • 1
  • Julien Guerrier
    • 2
  1. 1.European CommissionBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Unit 1 General CoordinationDirectorate General Enterprise and Industry, European CommissionBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations