TwitAg: A Multi-agent Feature Selection and Recommendation Framework for Twitter

  • Frank Grove
  • Sandip Sen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7057)

Abstract

With increasing number of users using social networking, there has been a considerable increase in user-generated content. Social networking is often used to connect with others, but in some domains such as microblogging social networking is primarily used to find interesting content. With the diversity of information sources available in microblogs, it becomes difficult for users to find interesting information sources. Recommendation engines have been developed to mitigate the problem of interesting content location in many domains, however recommendation engine research within the domain of microblogs has not been significantly explored. A key characteristic for any recommendation system is the ability to accurately classify users. Within the field of classification research feature selection is a widely used technique for improving classification accuracy. We demonstrate Unique Feature Selection (UFS), an agent based feature selection mechanism which parallelizes feature selection within the microblogging site Twitter. We show the effectiveness of UFS in both minimizing the feature space and improving classification results.

Keywords

Feature Selection Feature Space Feature Selection Technique Recommendation Engine Twitter Network 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ramage, D., Dumais, S., Liebling, D.: Characterizing microblogs with topic models. In: ICWSM (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dongwoo, K., Yohan, J., Il-Chul, M., Alice, O.: Analysis of twitter lists as a potential source for discovering latent characteristics of users (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., Tseng, B.: Why we twitter: Understanding microblogging usage and communities. In: WebKDD/SNA-KDD. ACM (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kang, D.-K., Zhang, J., Silvescu, A., Honavar, V.: Multinomial Event Model Based Abstraction for Sequence and Text Classification. In: Zucker, J.-D., Saitta, L. (eds.) SARA 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3607, pp. 134–148. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Krishnamurthy, B., Gill, P., Arlitt, M.: A few chirps about twitterGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McCallum, A., Nigam, K.: A comparison of event models for naive bayes text classification. In: AAAI-1998 Workshop on Learning for Text Categorization (1998)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank Grove
    • 1
  • Sandip Sen
    • 1
  1. 1.University of TulsaTulsaUSA

Personalised recommendations