Advertisement

Online Regenerator Placement

  • George B. Mertzios
  • Mordechai Shalom
  • Prudence W. H. Wong
  • Shmuel Zaks
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7109)

Abstract

Connections between nodes in optical networks are realized by lightpaths. Due to the decay of the signal, a regenerator has to be placed on every lightpath after at most d hops, for some given positive integer d. A regenerator can serve only one lightpath. The placement of regenerators has become an active area of research during recent years, and various optimization problems have been studied. The first such problem is the Regeneration Location Problem (Rlp), where the goal is to place the regenerators so as to minimize the total number of nodes containing them. We consider two extreme cases of online Rlp regarding the value of d and the number k of regenerators that can be used in any single node. (1) d is arbitrary and k unbounded. In this case a feasible solution always exists. We show an O(log|X| ·logd)-competitive randomized algorithm for any network topology, where X is the set of paths of length d. The algorithm can be made deterministic in some cases. We show a deterministic lower bound of \(\Omega \left({{\log (|{E}|/d) \cdot \log d} \over{\log ({\log (|{E}|/d) \cdot \log d})}}\right)\), where E is the edge set. (2) d = 2 and k = 1. In this case there is not necessarily a solution for a given input. We distinguish between feasible inputs (for which there is a solution) and infeasible ones. In the latter case, the objective is to satisfy the maximum number of lightpaths. For a path topology we show a lower bound of \(\sqrt{l}/2\) for the competitive ratio (where l is the number of internal nodes of the longest lightpath) on infeasible inputs, and a tight bound of 3 for the competitive ratio on feasible inputs.

Keywords

online algorithms optical networks 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alon, N., Awerbuch, B., Azar, Y., Buchbinder, N., Naor, S.: The online set cover problem. SIAM J. Computing 39(2), 361–370 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Borodin, A., El-Yaniv, R.: Online Computation and Competitive Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, S., Ljubic, I., Raghavan, S.: The regenerator location problem. Networks 55(3), 205–220 (2010)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fedrizzi, R., Galimberti, G.M., Gerstel, O., Martinelli, G., Salvadori, E., Saradhi, C.V., Tanzi, A., Zanardi, A.: Traffic independent heuristics for regenerator site selection for providing any-to-any optical connectivity. In: Proceedings of IEEE/OSA Conference on Optical Fiber Communications, OFC (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Flammini, M., Marchetti-Spaccamela, A., Monaco, G., Moscardelli, L., Zaks, S.: On the complexity of the regenerator placement problem in optical networks. IEEE-TON 19(2), 498–511 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Flammini, M., Monaco, G., Moscardelli, L., Shalom, M., Zaks, S.: Optimizing Regenerator Cost in Traffic Grooming. In: Lu, C., Masuzawa, T., Mosbah, M. (eds.) OPODIS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6490, pp. 443–458. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim, S.W., Seo, S.W.: Regenerator placement algorithms for connection establishment in all-optical networks. IEE Proceedings Communications 148(1), 25–30 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mertzios, G.B., Sau, I., Shalom, M., Zaks, S.: Placing Regenerators in Optical Networks to Satisfy Multiple Sets of Requests. In: Abramsky, S., Gavoille, C., Kirchner, C., Meyer auf der Heide, F., Spirakis, P.G. (eds.) ICALP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6199, pp. 333–344. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pachnicke, S., Paschenda, T., Krummrich, P.M.: Physical impairment based regenerator placement and routing in translucent optical networks. In: Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exposition and The National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference, page OWA2. Optical Society of America (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sriram, K., Griffith, D., Su, R., Golmie, N.: Static vs. dynamic regenerator assignment in optical switches: models and cost trade-offs. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on High Performance Switching and Routing (HPSR), pp. 151–155 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yang, X., Ramamurthy, B.: Dynamic routing in translucent WDM optical networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 955–971 (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yang, X., Ramamurthy, B.: Sparse regeneration in translucent wavelength-routed optical networks: Architecture, network design and wavelength routing. Photonic Network Communications 10(1), 39–53 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • George B. Mertzios
    • 1
  • Mordechai Shalom
    • 2
  • Prudence W. H. Wong
    • 3
  • Shmuel Zaks
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Engineering and Computing SciencesDurham UniversityUK
  2. 2.TelHai CollegeUpper GalileeIsrael
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
  4. 4.Department of Computer ScienceTechnionHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations