Advertisement

Empirical Study on Quality Requirements of Migration Metadata

  • Feng Luan
  • Mads Nygård
  • Guttorm Sindre
  • Trond Aalberg
  • Shengtong Zhong
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 253)

Abstract

Migration requires metadata about old hardware/software configurations or old computer technologies. However, current metadata schemas used in preservation systems are different and it is difficult to judge the actual quality requirement of metadata migration. This paper presents a set of quality requirements for migration metadata and the necessity and sufficiency of these requirements are evaluated with a questionnaire that was distributed internationally and followed up by several telephone interviews. The survey results indicate that our requirements are complete and can be classified into three levels, namely essentiality, necessity, and conditionality. The proposed quality requirements can be used by custodians as a checklist to examine their metadata schemas in terms of how well they can support migration.

Keywords

Information Management Migration Metadata Requirements Long-term Preservation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Waters, D., Garrett, J.: Preserving Digital Information. Report of the Task Force on Archiving of Digital Information (1996)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Strodl, S., Becker, C., Neumayer, R., Rauber, A.: How to choose a digital preservation strategy: evaluating a preservation planning procedure. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. ACM, Vancouver (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Triebsees, T., Borghoff, U.M.: Towards automatic document migration: semantic preservation of embedded queries. In: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering, pp. 209–218. ACM, Winnipeg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hunter, J., Choudhury, S.: PANIC: an integrated approach to the preservation of composite digital objects using Semantic Web services. International Journal on Digital Libraries 6(2), 174–183 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ferreira, M., Baptista, A., Ramalho, J.: An intelligent decision support system for digital preservation. International Journal on Digital Libraries 6(4), 295–304 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Becker, C., Kulovits, H., Guttenbrunner, M., Strodl, S., Rauber, A., Hofman, H.: Systematic planning for digital preservation: evaluating potential strategies and building preservation plans. International Journal on Digital Libraries 10(4), 157 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Luan, F., Mestl, T., Nygård, M.: Quality Requirements of Migration Metadata in Long-term Digital Preservation Systems. In: Sánchez-Alonso, S., Athanasiadis, I.N. (eds.) MTSR 2010. CCIS, vol. 108, pp. 172–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lavoie, B., Gartner, R.: Technology Watch Report - Preservation Metadata. DPC Technology Watch Series Report 05-01 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    The OCLC/RLG Working Group on Preservation Metadata: Preservation Metadata and the OAIS Information Model. A Metadata Framework to Support the Preservation of Digital Objects (2002) , http://www.oclc.org/research/pmwg/pm_framework.pdf
  10. 10.
    The Consultative committee for Space Data Systems: The Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS) (2002), http://public.ccsds.org/publications/archive/650x0b1.PDF
  11. 11.
    The National Library of New Zealand: Metadata Standards Framework - Preservation Metadata (2003), http://www.natlib.govt.nz/catalogues/library-documents/preservation-metadata-revised
  12. 12.
    The National Archive of Norway: Noark 5 - Standard for Records Management (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dale, R.L., Ambacher, B.: Trustworthy Repositories Audit & Certification: Criteria and Checklist, TRAC (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dobratz, S., Schoger, A., Strathmann, S.: The nestor Catalogue of Criteria for Trusted Digital Repository Evaluation and Certification. Journal of Digital Information 8(2) (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wheatley, P.: Migration–a CAMiLEON discussion paper. Ariadne 29(2) (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dillman, D.A.: Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Feng Luan
    • 1
  • Mads Nygård
    • 1
  • Guttorm Sindre
    • 1
  • Trond Aalberg
    • 1
  • Shengtong Zhong
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer and Information ScienceNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations