Introducing the European Space Agency Architectural Framework for Space-Based Systems of Systems Engineering

  • Daniele Gianni
  • Niklas Lindman
  • Joachim Fuchs
  • Robert Suzic
Conference paper

Abstract

System of Systems (SoS) engineering introduces a higher level of complexity compared to conventional systems engineering, for the number and geographical distribution of resources, and for interoperability and agreements issues, for example. In domains such as defence or Information Technology, architecting methodologies have been introduced to address engineering needs deriving from this increased level of complexity. From ongoing and future European space programmes, ESA has identified new engineering needs that cannot be addressed with existing methodologies. These needs concern the use of the methodology to support decision making, the representation of European regulation and policies, and the representation of space-specific domain concepts. In this paper, we introduce the European Space Agency Architectural Framework (ESA-AF), an architecting methodology that aims to address these new engineering needs by improving on existing architecting methodologies. In addition, ESA-AF introduces exploitation tools for user-friendly interactive visualisation of SoS architectural models and for textual reporting of model data, enabling non technical users to exploit these models. We also briefly present example applications of ESA-AF in support of SoS engineering activities for the Galileo navigation, the Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES), and the Space Situational Awareness (SSA) programmes.

Keywords

SoS ESA-AF enterprise architecting architectural framework MODAF TOGAF space 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Jamshidi, M.: Systems of Systems Engineering: Innovation for the 21st Century. Wiley (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    The Open Group, TOGAF 9TM Enterprise Edition (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    MODAF Guidance, UK MoD (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    GMES Project web page, http://www.gmes.info
  6. 6.
    Bobrinsky, N., Del Monte, L.: The Space Situational Awareness Programme of the European Space Agency. Cosmic Research 48(5), 392–398 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    ESA, Convention for the Establishment of a European Space Agency and ESA Council, ESA Publishing Division, SP-1271 (October 2003) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    DoDAF V2.02: Introduction, Overview, and Concepts - Manager’s Guide, vol. 1 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    NAF, Nato Architectural Framework v.3 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Budinsky, F., Steinberg, D., Merks, E., Ellersick, R., Grose, T.J.: Eclipse Modeling Framework. Addison Wesley (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Gianni, D., Bowen-Lewis, J.: Inference Patterns for ESA-AF Models. ESA Technical Report (July 2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lisi, M.: Engineering a Service Oriented System: the Galileo Approach. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on System & Concurrent Engineering for Space Applications (SECESA 2010), Lausanne, Switzerland (October 2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gianni, D., Lewis-Bowen, J., Lindman, N., Fuchs, J.: Modelling Methodologies in Support of Complex Systems of Systems Design and Integration: Example Applications. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on System & Concurrent Engineering for Space Applications (SECESA 2010), Lausanne, Switzerland (October 2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gianni, D., Fuchs, J., De Simone, P., Lindman, N., Lisi, M.: A Model-based Approach to Signal-In-Space Specifications for Designing Galileo Receivers. InsideGNSS 6(1), 32–39 (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vega, SoSDEN Project Final Report (June 2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gianni, D., Lindman, N., Moulin, S., Fuchs, J.: SSA-DPM: A Model-based Methodology for the Definition and Verification of European Space Situational Awareness Data Policy. In: Proceedings of the 1st European Space Surveillance Conference (June 2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gianni, D., Lindman, N., Fuchs, J., Suzic, R., Fischer, D.: A Model-based Approach to Support Systems of Systems Security Engineering for Data Policies. INCOSE Insight, Special Feature on Systems of Systems and Self-Organizing Security 14(2), 18–22 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniele Gianni
    • 1
  • Niklas Lindman
    • 1
    • 2
  • Joachim Fuchs
    • 1
  • Robert Suzic
    • 1
  1. 1.European Space AgencyNoordwijkThe Netherlands
  2. 2.ESA/ESTECNoordwijkThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations