ROSATOM’s NPP Development System Architecting: Systems Engineering to Improve Plant Development

  • Mikhail Belov
  • Alexander Kroshilin
  • Vjacheslav Repin
Conference paper

Abstract

This article is devoted to the architecting of the NPP unit development system (NPPDS) for ROSATOM corporation in a new NPP design initiative, VVER TOITM. The NPPDS is considered to be a set of processes, organization structures, data, databases, software and interfaces, and documentation.

The rationale for selecting the architecture framework approach for NPPDS architecting is given and the specific original Capital Project Architecture Framework (CPAF) previously developed is described.

The stakeholders and their concerns are defined, as are the views developed based on CPAF viewpoints. Views cover functions and processes, organization structure, data and aspects of software systems of the NPPDS.

Keywords

Life Cycle Stage Building Information Model Life Cycle Management Manufacture Execution System Architecture Framework 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    FEA PMO, FEA Consolidated Reference Model Document Version 2.3 (October 2007), http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/fea_docs/FEA_CRM_v23_Final_Oct_2007_Revised.pdf (accessed June 20, 2011)
  2. 2.
    INCOSE, Systems Engineering Handbook v. 3.2 INCOSE (January 2010) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sessions, R.: A Comparison of the Top Four Enterprise-Architecture Methodologies. MSDN Library (May 2007), http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb466232.aspx
  4. 4.
    The Open Group, The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) - Version 9, Enterprise Edition (2009), http://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/ (accessed June 20, 2011)
  5. 5.
    UK Department of Transport TRAK Steering Group, TRAK Enterprise Architecture Framework (2010), http://trak.sourceforge.net/ (accessed June 20, 2011)
  6. 6.
    US Department of the Treasury Chief Information Officer Council. Treasury Enterprise Architecture Framework. Version 1 (July 2000) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    US Department of Defense, DoD Architecture Framework Version 2.0 (2009), http://cio-nii.defense.gov/docs/DoDAF%20V2%20-%20Volume%201.pdf (accessed June 20-27, 2011)
  8. 8.
    van’t Wout, J., Waage, M., Hartman, H., Stahlecker, M., Hofman, A.: The Integrated Architecture Framework Explained. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zachman, J.: A Framework for Information Systems Architecture. IBM Systems Journal 26, 276–292 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mikhail Belov
    • 1
  • Alexander Kroshilin
    • 2
  • Vjacheslav Repin
    • 3
  1. 1.IBSMoscowRussia
  2. 2.VNIIAESMoscowRussia
  3. 3.PLM DepartmentIBSMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations