Abstract

The Representational State Transfer (REST) architectural style has seen substantial growth and adoption for the design of modern Resource-Oriented Architectures. However, the impact of fundamental constraints such as stateful resources, stateless interactions, and the uniform interface have had only limited uptake and impact in the Business Process Modeling (BPM) community in general, and in the standardization activities revolving around the BPMN notation. In this paper we propose a simple and minimal extension of the BPMN 2.0 notation to provide first-class support for the concept of resource. We show several examples of how the extended notation can be used to externalize the state of a process as a resource, as well as to describe process-driven composition of resources.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Allamaraju, S.: RESTful Web Services Cookbook. O’Reilly & Associates, Sebastopol (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Assmann, U.: Invasive Software Composition. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barros, A.P., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: Service Interaction Patterns. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Benatallah, B., Casati, F., Curbera, F. (eds.) BPM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3649, pp. 302–318. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fielding, R.T.: Architectural Styles and the Design of Network-based Software Architectures. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Irvine, California (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fielding, R.T., Taylor, R.N.: Principled Design of the Modern Web Architecture. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology 2(2), 115–150 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Foster, I., Parastatidis, S., Watson, P., McKeown, M.: How Do I Model State? Let Me Count the Ways. Communications of the ACM 51(9), 34–41 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Humphrey, M., Wasson, G.S., Jackson, K.R., Boverhof, J., Rodriguez, M., Gawor, J., Bester, J., Lang, S., Foster, I.T., Meder, S., Pickles, S., McKeown, M.: State and events for Web services: a comparison of five WS-resource framework and WS-notification implementations. In: Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing (HPDC-14), pp. 3–13 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lessen, T.V., Leymann, F., Mietzner, R., Nitzsche, J., Schleicher, D.: A Management Framework for WS-BPEL. In: Proc. of the Sixth European Conference on Web Services (ECOWS 2008), pp. 187–196 (2008), http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1488724.1488774
  9. 9.
    Leymann, F., Roller, D., Schmidt, M.T.: Web services and business process management. IBM Systems Journal 41(2), 198–211 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    zur Muehlen, M., Recker, J.: How Much Language Is Enough? Theoretical and Practical Use of the Business Process Modeling Notation. In: Bellahsène, Z., Léonard, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5074, pp. 465–479. Springer, Heidelberg (2008), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69534-9_35 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    OMG: BPMN: Business Process Modeling Notation 2.0. Object Management Group (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Overdick, H.: Towards Resource-Oriented BPEL. In: Proc. of the 2nd ECOWS Workshop on Emerging Web Services Technology (WEWST 2007) (November 2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pasley, J.: How BPEL and SOA Are Changing Web Services Development. IEEE Internet Computing 9(3), 60–67 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pautasso, C.: RESTful Web Service Composition with BPEL for REST. Data & Knowledge Engineering 68(9), 851–866 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pautasso, C., Zimmermann, O., Leymann, F.: RESTful Web Services vs. ”Big” Web Services: Making the Right Architectural Decision. In: Huai, J., Chen, R., Hon, H.W., Liu, Y., Ma, W.Y., Tomkins, A., Zhang, X. (eds.) 17th International World Wide Web Conference, pp. 805–814. ACM Press, Beijing (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Richardson, L., Ruby, S.: RESTful Web Services. O’Reilly & Associates, Sebastopol (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vinoski, S.: RPC and REST: Dilemma, Disruption, and Displacement. IEEE Internet Computing 12(5), 92–95 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vinoski, S.: Serendipitous Reuse. IEEE Internet Computing 12(1), 84–87 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Webber, J., Parastatidis, S., Robinson, I.: REST in Practice: Hypermedia and Systems Architecture. O’Reilly & Associates, Sebastopol (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weerawarana, S., Curbera, F., Leymann, F., Storey, T., Ferguson, D.: Web Services Platform Architecture. Prentice Hall (March 2005)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wilde, E., Pautasso, C. (eds.): REST: From Research to Practice. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    zur Muehlen, M., Nickerson, J.V., Swenson, K.D.: Developing Web Services Choreography Standards — The Case of REST vs. SOAP. Decision Support Systems 40(1), 9–29 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cesare Pautasso
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Informatics University of Lugano (USI)LuganoSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations