Task Planning for an Autonomous Service Robot

Chapter
Part of the Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics book series (STAR, volume 76)

Abstract

In the DESIRE project an autonomous robot capable of performing service tasks in a typical kitchen environment has been developed. The overall system consists of various loosely coupled subcomponents providing particular features like manipulating objects or recognizing and interacting with humans. To bring all these subcomponents together to act as monolithic system, a high-performance planning system has been implemented. In this paper, we present this system’s basic architecture and some advanced extensions necessary to cope with the various challenges arising in dynamic and uncertain environments like those a real world service robot is usually faced with.

Keywords

Global Memory Service Robot Task Planning Temporal Planning Grasp Action 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Brenner, M., Nebel, B.: Continual planning and acting in dynamic multiagent environments. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems 19(3), 297–331 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dornhege, C., Eyerich, P., Keller, T., Trüg, S., Brenner, M., Nebel, B.: Semantic attachments for domain-independent planning systems. In: Proc. ICAPS 2009, pp. 114–121 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eyerich, P., Mattmüller, R., Röger, G.: Using the context-enhanced additive heuristic for temporal and numeric planning. In: Proc. ICAPS 2009, pp. 130–137 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fox, M., Long, D.: PDDL 2.1: An extension to PDDL for expressing temporal planning domains. JAIR 20, 61–124 (2003)MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Geffner, H.: Functional STRIPS: a more flexible language for planning and problem solving, pp. 187–209 (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ghallab, M., Nau, D., Traverso, P.: Automated Planning: Theory and Practice. Morgan Kaufmann (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Helmert, M.: The Fast Downward planning system. JAIR 26, 191–246 (2006)MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Littman, M.L., Goldsmith, J., Mundhenk, M.: The computational complexity of probabilistic planning. JAIR 9, 1–36 (1998)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Plöger, P., Pervölz, K., Mies, C., Eyerich, P., Brenner, M., Nebel, B.: The DESIRE service robotics initiative. KI 4, 29–32 (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rintanen, J.: Constructing conditional plans by a theorem-prover. JAIR 10, 323–352 (1999)MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Keller
    • 1
  • Patrick Eyerich
    • 1
  • Bernhard Nebel
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für InformatikAlbert-Ludwigs-Universität FreiburgFreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations