Advertisement

An Ontology Design Pattern for Referential Qualities

  • Jens Ortmann
  • Desiree Daniel
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7031)

Abstract

Referential qualities are qualities of an entity taken with reference to another entity. For example the vulnerability of a coast to sea level rise. In contrast to most non-relational qualities which only depend on their host, referential qualities require a referent additional to their host, i.e. a quality Q of an entity X taken with reference to another entity R. These qualities occur frequently in ecological systems, which make concepts from these systems challenging to model in formal ontology. In this paper, we discuss exemplary resilience, vulnerability and affordance as qualities of an entity taken with reference to an external factor. We suggest an ontology design pattern for referential qualities. The design pattern is anchored in the foundational ontology DOLCE and evaluated using implementations for the notions affordance, resilience and vulnerability.

Keywords

Relational Quality Formal Ontology Quality Space Ontology Engineer Climate Change Knowledge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Adger, W.: Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Progress in Human Geography 24(3), 347–363 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    von Bertalanffy, L.: An outline of general system theory. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1(2), 134–165 (1950)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bridgeman, P.: The logics of modern physics. Beaufort Books (1927)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burstein, F., Gregor, S.: The systems development or engineering approach to research in information systems: An action research perspective. In: Hope, B., Yoong, P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 10th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, pp. 122–134. Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Anderies, J.M., Abel, N.: From Metaphor to Measurement: Resilience of What to What? Ecosystems 4(8), 765–781 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Daniel, D., Ortmann, J.: Disambiguating Resilience. In: Schwering, A., Pebesma, E., Behnke, K. (eds.) Geoinformatik 2011 - Geochange. ifgiprints, vol. 41, pp. 117–125. AKA Verlag, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ellis, B.: Scientific Essentialism. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gangemi, A.: Ontology Design Patterns for Semantic Web Content. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V., Musen, M. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 262–276. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gangemi, A., Mika, P.: Understanding the Semantic web Through Descriptions and Situations. In: Chung, S., Schmidt, D.C. (eds.) CoopIS 2003, DOA 2003, and ODBASE 2003. LNCS, vol. 2888, pp. 689–706. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gangemi, A., Presutti, V.: Ontology design patterns. In: Handbook on Ontologies, 2nd edn. International Handbooks on Information Systems, pp. 221–243. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gibson, J.: The Theory of Affordances. In: Shaw, R.E., Bransford, J. (eds.) Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology, pp. 67–82. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale (1977)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gibson, J.: The ecological approach to visual perception. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1979)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Handmer, J.W., Dovers, S.R.: A typology of resilience: Rethinking institutions for sustainable development. Organization & Environment 9(4), 482–511 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heft, H.: Affordances and the body: An intentional analysis of Gibson’s ecological approach to visual perception. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 19(1), 1–30 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Holling, C.: Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4, 1–23 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    ICSU: Earth system science for global sustainability: The grand challenges. Tech. rep., International Council for Science, Paris (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Janowicz, K., Raubal, M.: Affordance-Based Similarity Measurement for Entity Types. In: Winter, S., Duckham, M., Kulik, L., Kuipers, B. (eds.) COSIT 2007. LNCS, vol. 4736, pp. 133–151. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Klein, R., Nicholls, J., Thomalla, F.: Resilience to natural hazards: How useful is this concept? Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards 5(1-2), 35–45 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kollartis, S., Wergels, N.: MONITOR – an ontological basis for risk managment. Tech. rep., MONITOR (January 2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kuhn, W.: Semantic reference systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 17(5), 405–409 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kuhn, W., Raubal, M.: Implementing Semantic Reference Systems. In: Gould, M., Laurini, R., Coulondre, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the AGILE 2003 - 6th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science, Lyon, France, pp. 63–72. Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes, Lausanne (2003)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Masolo, C., Borgo, S.: Qualities in formal ontology. In: Foundational Aspects of Ontologies (FOnt 2005) Workshop at KI, pp. 2–16 (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Masolo, C., Borgo, S., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Oltramari, A.: Wonderweb deliverable D18 ontology library (final). ICT Project 33052 (2003)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Miller, F., Osbahr, H., Boyd, E., Thomalla, F., Bharwani, S., Ziervogel, G., Walker, B., Birkmann, J., van der Leeuw, S., Rockstrôm, J.: Resilience and vulnerability: Complementary or conflicting concepts? Ecology and Society 15(3) (2010)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Norman, D.: The Design of Everyday Things (Originally published: The psychology of everyday things). Basic Books, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Noy, N., Rector, A.: Defining N-ary Relations on the Semantic Web. Working group note, W3C (April 2006), http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations/
  27. 27.
    Olmos, S.: Vulnerability and adaptation to climate change: Concepts, issues, assessment methods. Tech. rep., Climate Change Knowledge Network, CCKN (2001)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ortmann, J., Kuhn, W.: Affordances as Qualities. In: Galton, A., Mizoguchi, R. (eds.) Formal Ontology in Information Systems Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference (FOIS 2010). Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 209, pp. 117–130. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2010)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Probst, F.: Observations, measurements and semantic reference spaces. Applied Ontology 3(1-2), 63–89 (2008)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Raubal, M.: Ontology and epistemology for agent-based wayfinding simulation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 15(7), 653–665 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rome, E., Hertzberg, J., Dorffner, G.: Towards Affordance-Based Robot Control: International Seminar Dagstuhl Castle, Germany. LNCS. Springer, Heidelberg (June 2006) (revised papers)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stoffregen, T.A.: Affordances as properties of the animal-environment system. Ecological Psychology 15(2), 115–134 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Turvey, M.: Affordances and prospective control: An outline of the ontology. Ecological Psychology 4(3), 173–187 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    UN/ISDR: Living with risk: A global review of disaster reduction initiatives. Tech. rep., Inter-Agency Secretariat of the International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (2004)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Walker, B., Carpenter, S., Anderies, J., Abel, N., Cumming, G., Janssen, M., Lebel, L., Norberg, J., Peterson, G., Prichard, R.: Resilience Management in Social-ecological System: a Working Hypothesis for a Participatory Approach. Conservation Ecology 6(1) (2002)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Waller, M.A.: Resilience in ecosystemic context: evolution of the concept. Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 71(3), 290–297 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Warren, W.: Perceiving affordances: Visual guidance of stair climbing. J. of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10(5), 683–703 (1984)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Weatherson, B.: Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Properties. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2006 edn. (2006), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/intrinsic-extrinsic/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jens Ortmann
    • 1
  • Desiree Daniel
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for GeoinformaticsUniversity of MuensterGermany

Personalised recommendations