Essential Requirements for Semantic CMS

Chapter

Abstract

CMS have to support a set of essential requirements in order to upgrade to semantic CMS. They have to own the capability of lifting content and enrich it with data from external, semantic sources such as the LOD cloud.

Keywords

Essential Requirement Link Open Data Content Management System Integrity Check Semantic Technology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adamou, A., Blomqvist, E., Bonafede, C., Daga, E., Nuzzolese, A., Presutti, V.: Knowledge Representation and Reasoning System (KReS) – Alpha version report. Tech. rep., IKS Consortium (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adamou, A., Blomqvist, E., Gangemi, A., Nuzzolese, A.G., Presutti, V., Behrendt, W., Damjanovic, V., Conconi, A.: IKS Deliverable 3.2: Ontological Requirements for Industrial CMS Applications. Tech. rep., IKS Consortium (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Adida, B., Birbeck, M., McCarron, S., Pemberton, S.: RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing – A Collection of Attributes and Processing Rules for Extending XHTML to Support RDF (2008). URL http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/
  4. 4.
    Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T.: Linked Data – The Story So Far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems pp. 1–22 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boley, H., Hallmark, G., Kifer, M., Brook, S., Paschke, A., Polleres, A., Reynolds, D.: Rif core dialect (2010). URL http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-core/
  6. 6.
    Gangemi, A., Presutti, V.: Ontology design patterns. In: S. Staab, R. Studer (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies, 2 edn., pp. 221–243. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Isele, R., Jentzsch, A., Bizer, C.: Silk Server – Adding missing Links while consuming Linked Data. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Consuming Linked Data. Shanghai, China (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kasper, W., Steffen, J., Nuzzolese, A.G., Presutti, V.: IKS Deliverable 3.3: Requirements for Semantic Lifting / Wrapping Components. Tech. rep., IKS Consortium (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Laleci, G.B., Kilic, O., Aluc, G., Dogac, A., Sinaci, A., Tuncer, F.: IKS Deliverable 3.4: Semantic Data Access and Persistence Requirements Specification. Tech. rep., IKS Consortium (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Laleci, G.B., Kilic, O., Cimen, C.: IKS Deliverable 5.4 Intermediate Report – Semantic Data Access and Persistence Components Semantic Data Access and Persistence Components. Tech. rep., IKS Consortium (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liebig, T., Luther, M., Noppens, O., Rodriguez, M., Calvanese, D., Wessel, M., Horridge, M., Bechhofer, S., Tsarkov, D., Sirin, E.: OWLlink: DIG for OWL 2. In: Proceedings of the 5th InternationalWorkshop on The OWL: Experiences and Direction (OWLED 2008). Karlsruhe, Germany (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lombardi, V.: Smarter Content Publishing (2002). URL http://www.digital-web.com/articles/smarter_content_publishing/
  14. 14.
    Manola, F., Miller, E.: RDF Primer (2004). URL http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/
  15. 15.
    Miles, A., Bechhofer, S.: SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Reference (2009). URL http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/
  16. 16.
    amd P. F. Patel-Schneider, I.H., Boley, H., Tabet, S., Grosof, B., Dean, M.: SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML (2004). URL http://www.daml.org/2004/11/fol/rules-all. W3C
  17. 17.
    Rector, A., Stevens, R.: Barriers to the use of OWL in Knowledge Driven Applications. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on The OWL: Experiences and Direction (OWLED 2008). Karlsruhe, Germany (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Romanelli, M., Germesin, S., Adamou, A., Damianovic, V., Janzen, S., Filler, A., Conconi, A., Kowatsch, T., Becker, T.: IKS Deliverable 3.1: Model of Knowledge Based Interaction. Tech. rep., IKS Consortium (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sheth, A., Bertram, C., Avant, D., Hammond, B., Kochut, K., Warke, Y.: Managing semantic content for the web. IEEE Internet Computing 6(4), 80–87 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    W3C OWL Working Group: OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Document Overview (2009). URL http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/
  21. 21.
    W3C SWEO Community Project: Main page (2010). URL http://esw.w3.org/SweoIG/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/LinkingOpenData

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Semantic Technology Laboratory of the National Research Council (ISTC-CNR)RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations