High Speed Capture, Retrieval and Rendering of Segment-Based Annotations on 3D Museum Objects

  • Chih-Hao Yu
  • Tudor Groza
  • Jane Hunter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7008)

Abstract

The aim of the 3D Semantic Annotation (3DSA) system is to deliver a Web-based semantic tagging and annotation service for 3D cultural heritage objects - that enables users to attach semantic tags/annotations to points, surface regions and volumetric segments on 3D digital objects. Specific objectives of the 3DSA system are: support for interactively defined, complex 3D segments; interoperability of the resulting tags/annotations; and fast, efficient capture, retrieval and rendering of annotations on complex 3D fragments. With these objectives in mind, the 3DSA system is based on the Open Annotations Collaboration (OAC) model, which has been extended using X3D fragment identifiers. This paper describes our implementation of the X3D extensions to the OAC data model and demonstrates how this approach significantly improves the speed of capturing, retrieving, downloading and rendering annotations on volumetric segments. The context for this work is the capture of community-generated tags and annotations for cultural heritage artifacts from the University of Queensland Antiquities Museum.

Keywords

Semantic Annotation Tagging 3D Cultural Heritage Open Annotation Collaboration OAC X3D 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Koller, D., Frischer, B., Humphreys, G.: Research challenges for digital archives of 3D cultural heritage models. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 2(3), 1–17 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ikeuchi, K.: 3D digital preservation of cultural heritages (2002), http://www.cvl.iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp/gallery_e/
  3. 3.
    Hunter, J., et al.: Using the semantic grid to build bridges between museums and indigenous communities. In: Proceedings of the GGF11-Semantic Grid Applications Workshop, Honolulu, Hawaii, pp. 46–61 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rowe, J., Razdan, A.: A Prototype Digital Library for 3D Collections: Tools To Capture, Model, Analyze, and Query Complex 3D Data. In: Museums and the Web 2003: Proceedings, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA. Archives & Museum Informatics, Toronto (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chun, S., et al.: Steve.museum: An Ongoing Experiment in Social Tagging, Folksonomy, and Museum, Albuquerque, New Mexico. Archives & Museum Informatics, Toronto (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Adobe: Using Adobe Acrobat X Standard., Adobe Systems Incorporated, San Jose, California, pp. 304–305 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jung, T., Gross, M.D., Do, E.: Annotating and sketching on 3D web models. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, San Francisco, California. ACM, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Attene, M., et al.: Characterization of 3D shape parts for semantic annotation. Computer-Aided Design 41(10), 756–763 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Havemann, S., et al.: The arrigo showcase reloaded—towards a sustainable link between 3D and semantics. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 2(1) (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    ISO/IEC (2006) Information technology—MPEG-21, part 17: fragment identification of MPEG resources. ISO/IEC 21000-17:2006 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Spagnuolo, M., Falcidieno, B.: 3D Media and the Semantic Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems 24(2), 90–96 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Trant, J.: Tagging, Folksonomies and Art Museums: Early Experiments and Ongoing Research. Journal of Digital Information 10(1) (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Trant, J., Wyman, B.: Investigating social tagging and folksonomy in art museums with steve.museum. In: World Wide Web, Edinburgh (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hunter, J., Gerber, A.: Harvesting community annotations on 3D models of museum artefacts to enhance knowledge, discovery and re-use. Journal of Cultural Heritage 11(1), 81–90 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hunter, J., Henderson, M., Khan, I.: Collaborative annotation of 3D crystallographic models. Journal of Chemical Information And Modeling 47(6), 2475–2484 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kadobayashi, R., et al.: 3D Model Annotation from Multiple Viewpoints for Croquet. In: The Fourth International Conference on Creating, Connecting and Collaborating through Computing, C5 2006, Berkeley (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Daly, L., Brutzman, D.: X3D: extensible 3D graphics standard. In: ACM Siggraph Asia 2008 Courses, Singapore, pp. 1–6. ACM, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hunter, J., et al.: The Open Annotation Collaboration: A Data Model to Support Sharing and Interoperability of Scholarly Annotations. In: Digital Humanities 2010. King’s College, London (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sanderson, R., Sompel, H.V.d.: Open Annotation Alpha3 Example: Hubble Deep Field Image (2010), http://www.openannotation.org/spec/alpha3/examples/hubble.html
  20. 20.
    Hu, L.J.: Pleasures of the Imperial Treasure - Gaining historical insight at the National Palace Museum of Taiwan. My Favourite Museum (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Crawley, S., Chernich, R.: Danno/Dannotate Overview (2010), http://metadata.net/sites/danno/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chih-Hao Yu
    • 1
  • Tudor Groza
    • 1
  • Jane Hunter
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of QueenslandBrisbane St LuciaAustralia

Personalised recommendations