Predicting Computer Performance Dynamics

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7014)


Traditional approaches to the design and analysis of computer systems employ linear, stochastic mathematics—techniques that are becoming increasingly inadequate as computer architects push the design envelope. To work effectively with these complex engineered systems, one needs models that correctly capture their dynamics, which are deterministic and highly nonlinear. This is important not only for analysis, but also for design. Even an approximate forecast of the state variables of a running computer could be very useful in tailoring system resources on the fly to the dynamics of a computing application—powering down unused cores, for instance, or adapting cache configuration to memory usage patterns. This paper proposes a novel prediction strategy that uses nonlinear time-series methods to forecast processor load and cache performance, and evaluates its performance on a set of simple C programs running on an Intel Core® Duo.


Average Mutual Information Performance Trace Nonlinear Time Series Cache Performance Topological Conjugacy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Alexander, Z., Mytkowicz, T., Diwan, A., Bradley, E.: Measurement and dynamical analysis of computer performance data. In: Cohen, P.R., Adams, N.M., Berthold, M.R. (eds.) IDA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6065, pp. 18–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Armstrong, B., Eigenmann, R.: Performance forecasting: Towards a methodology for characterizing large computational applications. In: Proc. of the Int’l Conf. on Parallel Processing, pp. 518–525 (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bradley, E.: Analysis of time series. In: Berthold, M., Hand, D. (eds.) Intelligent Data Analysis: An Introduction, vol. 2, pp. 199–226. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Browne, S., Deane, C., Ho, G., Mucci, P.: PAPI: A portable interface to hardware performance counters. In: Proceedings of Department of Defense HPCMP Users Group Conference. Department of Defense (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fraser, A., Swinney, H.: Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information. Phys. Rev. A 33(2), 1134–1140 (1986)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hegger, R., Kantz, H., Schreiber, T.: Practical implementation of nonlinear time series methods: The TISEAN package. Chaos 9(2), 413–435 (1999)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kantz, H., Schreiber, T.: Nonlinear Time Series Analysis, vol. 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kennel, M., Brown, R., Abarbanel, H.: Determining embedding dimension for phase-space reconstruction using a geometrical construction. Phys. Rev. A 45(6), 3403–3411 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lorenz, E.: Atmospheric predictability as revealed by naturally occurring analogues. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 26(4), 636–646 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Meiss, J.: Differential Dynamical Systems. Mathematical Modeling and Computation. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (2007)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mytkowicz, T.: Supporting experiments in computer systems research. Ph.D. thesis, University of Colorado (November 2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mytkowicz, T., Diwan, A., Bradley, E.: Computer systems are dynamical systems. Chaos 19(3), 033124–033124–14 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sauer, T., Yorke, J., Casdagli, M.: Embedology. Journal of Statistical Physics 65, 579–616 (1991)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Takens, F.: Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. In: Rand, D., Young, L.S. (eds.) Dynamical Systems and Turbulence, Warwick 1980. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 898, pp. 366–381. Springer, Heidelberg (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ColoradoBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations