Performance Evaluation of Business Processes through a Formal Transformation to SAN

  • Kelly Rosa Braghetto
  • João Eduardo Ferreira
  • Jean-Marc Vincent
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6977)

Abstract

The qualitative and quantitative analysis of operational processes recently started to receive special attention with the business process management systems. But the Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN), the standard representation of business processes, is not the most appropriate kind of model to support the analysis phase. Most of the works proposing mappings from BPMN to formal languages aim model verification, but few are directed to quantitative analysis. In this work, we state that a well-defined BPMN Process diagram can originate a Stochastic Automata Network (SAN) – a compositionally built stochastic model. More than support verification, SAN provides a numerical evaluation of processes’ performance. SAN attenuates the state-space explosion problem associated with other Markovian formalisms and is used to model large systems. We defined an algorithm that automatically converts BPMN diagrams to SAN models. With these SAN models, we make analytical performance evaluations of business processes.

Keywords

Business Processes BPMN Performance Evaluation Stochastic Automata Network 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Braghetto, K.R., Ferreira, J.a.E., Vincent, J.M.: Performance analysis modeling applied to business processes. In: 2010 Spring Simulation Multiconference, pp. 122:1–122:8. SCS/ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brenner, L., Fernandes, P., Plateau, B., Sbeity, I.: PEPS2007 - stochastic automata networks software tool. In: 4th International Conference on Quantitative Evaluation of Systems, pp. 163–164. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Canevet, C., Gilmore, S., Hillston, J., Prowse, M., Stevens, P.: Performance modelling with the unified modelling language and stochastic process algebras. IEE Proceedings Computers and Digital Techniques 150(2), 107–120 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dijkman, R.M., Dumas, M., Ouyang, C.: Semantics and analysis of business process models in BPMN. Information and Software Technology 50(12), 1281–1294 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oliveira, C., Lima, R., Andre, T., Reijers, H.A.: Modeling and analyzing resource-constrained business processes. In: 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp. 2824–2830. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    OMG: BPMN 2.0 by example, version 1.0 (non-normative) (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    OMG: Business process model and notation (BPMN), version 2.0 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Plateau, B.: On the stochastic structure of parallelism and synchronization models for distributed algorithms. SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev. 13(2), 147–154 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Plateau, B., Atif, K.: Stochastic automata network for modeling parallel systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 17(10), 1093–1108 (1991)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Prandi, D., Quaglia, P., Zannone, N.: Formal analysis of BPMN via a translation into COWS. In: Wang, A.H., Tennenholtz, M. (eds.) COORDINATION 2008. LNCS, vol. 5052, pp. 249–263. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wong, P.Y.H., Gibbons, J.: A process semantics for BPMN. In: Liu, S., Araki, K. (eds.) ICFEM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5256, pp. 355–374. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kelly Rosa Braghetto
    • 1
  • João Eduardo Ferreira
    • 1
  • Jean-Marc Vincent
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrasil
  2. 2.LIG Laboratory - INRIA MESCAL ProjectJoseph Fourier UniversityMontbonnotFrance

Personalised recommendations