Metadata for Web Ontologies and Rules: Current Practices and Perspectives

  • Carlos Tejo-Alonso
  • Diego Berrueta
  • Luis Polo
  • Sergio Fernández
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 240)

Abstract

The Semantic Web contains a number of different knowledge artifacts, including OWL ontologies, RIF rule sets and RDF datasets. Effective exchange and management of these artifacts demand the use of metadata and prompt availability of accurate reference documentation. In this paper, we analyze the current practices in metadata usage for OWL ontologies, and we propose a vocabulary for annotating RIF rules. We also introduce a software tool –Parrot– that exploits these annotations and produces reference documentation for combinations of ontologies and rules.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alexander, K., Cyganiak, R., Hausenblas, M., Zhao, J.: Describing Linked Datasets with the VoID Vocabulary (March 2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Basca, C., Corlosquet, S., Cyganiak, R., Fernández, S., Schandl, T.: Neologism: Easy Vocabulary Publishing. In: Proceedings of the ESWC 2008 Workshop on Scripting for the Semantic Web (SFSW 2008) (June 2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berners-Lee, T.: Linked Data design issues (July 2006), http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
  4. 4.
    Boley, H., Kifer, M.: RIF Overview. Working Group Note, W3C (June 2010), http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-overview/
  5. 5.
    Brickley, D., Guha, R.: RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema. Recommendation, W3C (February 2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/
  6. 6.
    Brickley, D., Miller, L.: FOAF Vocabulary Specification (August 2010), http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/
  7. 7.
    Carroll, J.J., Klyne, G.: Resource Description Framework (RDF): Concepts and Abstract Syntax. Recommendation, W3C (February 2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/
  8. 8.
    Davis, I.: VANN: A vocabulary for annotating vocabulary descriptions. Technical report (2005), http://vocab.org/vann/
  9. 9.
    de Bruijn, J.: RIF RDF and OWL Compatibility. Recommendation, W3C (June 2010), http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-rdf-owl/
  10. 10.
    de Sainte Marie, C., Hallmark, G., Paschke, A.: RIF Production Rule Dialect. Recommendation, W3C (June 2010), http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-prd/
  11. 11.
    Hawke, S., Polleres, A.: RIF In RDF. Working Group Note, W3C (May 2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kifer, M., Boley, H.: RIF Basic Logic Dialect. Recommendation, W3C (June 2010), http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-bld/
  13. 13.
    Miles, A., Bechhofer, S.: SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Reference. Recommendation, W3C (August 2009), http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/
  14. 14.
    Motik, B., Parsia, B., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax. Recommendation, W3C (October 2009), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/
  15. 15.
    Zuckerberg, M., Taylor, B.: The Open Graph Protocol (April 2010), http://ogp.me/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos Tejo-Alonso
    • 1
  • Diego Berrueta
    • 1
  • Luis Polo
    • 1
  • Sergio Fernández
    • 1
  1. 1.Fundación CTIC GijónAsturiasSpain

Personalised recommendations