Equivalent Stiffness and Compliance of Curvilinear Elastic Fibers

  • Michele Marino
  • Giuseppe Vairo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Applied and Computational Mechanics book series (LNACM, volume 61)

Abstract

In this paper the mechanical response of curvilinear, anisotropic and inhomogeneous elastic fibers is addressed. A general model accounting for fiber three-dimensional geometry, as well as for shear and torsional effects together with the extensional ones is rationally deduced from the three-dimensional elasticity by means of a constrained approach. Closed-form relationships describing chord-referred equivalent tangent stiffnesses and compliances are obtained, generalizing a number of classical results when non-conventional effects are included. Proposed numerical applications highlight the influence of fiber geometric parameters and shear deformability, enabling also to put in evidence some limits of usually-employed assumptions. Finally, the fiber mechanical response in a large-displacement regime is modelled through an incremental formulation. In this context, explicit relationships for tangent and secant equivalent along-the-chord elastic moduli are deduced in the case of planar fibers, leading to powerful and direct relationships, useful for the analysis and the design of advanced composite materials reinforced by curvilinear elastic fibers.

Keywords

Equilibrium Problem Incremental Approach Secant Modulus Shear Correction Factor Advanced Composite Material 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hyer, M.W., Charette, R.F.: Use of curvilinear fiber format in composite structure design. AIAA J. 29(6), 1011–1015 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gürdal, Z., Olmedo, R.: In-plane response of laminates with spatially varying fiber orientations: variable stiffness concept. AIAA J. 31(4), 751–758 (1993)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Duvaut, G., Terrel, G., Lènè, F., Verijenko, V.E.: Optimization of fiber reinforced composites. Composite Structures 48, 83–89 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Camanho, P.P.: Advanced lightweigth structures based on non-conventional composite laminates. In: Ambrosio, J., Silva, M.T. (eds.) Proc. 7th EUROMECH Solid Mechanics Conference, Lisbon (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Comninou, M., Yannas, L.V.: Dependence of stress-strain nonlinearity of connective tissues on the geometry of collagen fibers. J. Biomech. 9, 427–433 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maceri, F., Marino, M., Vairo, G.: A unified multiscale mechanical model for soft collagenous tissues with regular fiber arrangement. J. Biomench. 43(2), 355–363 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maceri, F., Marino, M., Vairo, G.: An insight on multiscale tendon modeling in muscle-tendon integrated behavior. Biomech. Model Mechanobiol. (to appear, 2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marino, M., Vairo, G.: Stress and strain localization in stretched collagenous tissues. Comput. Meth. Biomech. Biomed. Eng. (to appear, 2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frish-Fay, R.: Flexible Bars. Butterworths, London (1962)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Basu, A.J., Lardner, T.J.: Deformation of a planar sinusoidal elastic beam. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 36, 461–474 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cartraud, P., Messager, T.: Computational homogenization of periodic beam-like structures. Int. J. Solid Struct. 43, 686–696 (2006)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Haussy, B., Jung, C., Ganghoffer, J.F.: Homogenisation of the undulations of a single yarn. Applications to the modelling of the traction. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 46, 961–979 (2004)MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kolpakov, A.G.: The governing equations of a thin elastic stressed beam with a periodic structure. J. Appl. Math. Mech. 63, 495–594 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Messager, T., Cartraud, P.: Homogenization of helical beam-like structures: application to single-walled carbon nanotubes. Comput. Mech. 41, 335–346 (2008)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Potier-Ferry, M., Siad, L.: Homogenénéisation géometrique d’une poutre ondulée (Geometrical homogenization of a corrugated beam). C. R. Acad. Sci. Mechanique 314, 425–430 (1992)MATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maceri, F., Bisegna, P.: Modellazione strutturale. In: Giangreco, E. (ed.) Ingegneria Delle Strutture, Utet, Torino, vol. II, pp. 1–90 (2002) (in Italian)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Maceri, F., Vairo, G.: Anisotropic thin-walled beam models: A rational deduction from three-dimensional elasticity. J. Mech. Mater. Struct. 4(2), 371–394 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kellogg, O.D.: Foundations of potential theory. Springer, Berlin (1929)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guggenheimer, H.W.: Differential geometry. Dover Publications, New York (1977)MATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ding, X., Selig, J.M.: On the compliance of coiled springs. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 46, 703–727 (2004)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vairo, G.: A closed-form refined model of the cables’ nonlinear response in cable-stayed structures. Mech. Adv. Mater Struct. 16, 456–466 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michele Marino
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Vairo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of Rome ‘‘Tor Vergata’’RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations