Sociotechnical Trust: An Architectural Approach
Current approaches in sociotechnical systems consider trust to be either cognitive—referring to actors’ mental models of each other—or technical—referring to an actor’s trust of a technical artifact. In this paper, we take a more expansive view of trust: in addition to the cognitive, we also consider trust in the architectural sense. Broadly, architectural trust applies at the level of roles. Our principal claim is that sociotechnical systems are essentially specified in terms of architectural trust. Whereas previous work has considered dependencies between actors as a fundamental social relation, we claim that no dependency can exist without the corresponding architectural trust.
KeywordsMultiagent System Social Trust Trust Relationship Technical Trust Prospective Participant
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Credit card accountability responsibility and disclosure act of (2009), http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-627
- 2.Asnar, Y., Giorgini, P., Massacci, F., Zannone, N.: From trust to dependability through risk analysis. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, pp. 19–26 (2007)Google Scholar
- 4.Castelfranchi, C., Tan, Y.-H.: The role of trust and deception in virtual societies. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 6(3), 55–70 (2002)Google Scholar
- 5.Standing Committee on The Food Chain and Animal Health. Food law implementation guidelines. World Wide Web electronic publication, January 2010, Lastchecked (December 2010)Google Scholar
- 12.Lipner, S.: The trustworthy computing security development lifecycle. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, pp. 2–13 (December 2004)Google Scholar
- 14.Siena, A., Armellin, G., Mameli, G., Mylopoulos, J., Perini, A., Susi, A.: Establishing regulatory compliance for information system requirements: An experience report from the health care domain. In: Parsons, J., Saeki, M., Shoval, P., Woo, C., Wand, Y. (eds.) ER 2010. LNCS, vol. 6412, pp. 90–103. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Singh, M.P.: Trust as a basis for social computing (2010), http://www.csc.ncsu.edu/faculty/mpsingh/papers/positions/Trust-formal-architecture-talk.pdf
- 18.Strens, R., Dobson, J.: How responsibility modelling leads to security requirements. In: Proceedings of the New Security Paradigms Workshop, pp. 143–149 (1993)Google Scholar