Investigating the Suitability of Social Robots for the Wellbeing of the Elderly

  • Suzanne Hutson
  • Soo Ling Lim
  • Peter J. Bentley
  • Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze
  • Ann Bowling
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6974)

Abstract

This study aims to understand if, and how, social robots can promote wellbeing in the elderly. The existing literature suggests that social robots have the potential to improve wellbeing in the elderly, but existing robots focus more on healthcare and healthy behaviour among the elderly. This work describes a new investigation based on focus groups and home studies, in which we produced a set of requirements for social robots that reduce loneliness and improve psychological wellbeing among the elderly. The requirements were validated with the participants of our study. We anticipate that the results of this work will lead to the design of a new social robot more suited to improving wellbeing of the elderly.

Keywords

Wellbeing elderly social robots 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Machielse, A.: Social isolation and the elderly: causes and consequences. In: Shanghai Int. Symp. on Caring for the Elderly, Workshop on Community & Care for the elderly (2006) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huppert, F.A.: Mental capital and well-being: making the most of ourselves in the 21st Century. Government Office for Science (2008) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ereaut, G., Whiting, R.: What do we mean by “wellbeing”? And why might it matter. Department for Children, Schools and Families, London (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huppert, F.A., Whittington, J.E.: Evidence for the independence of positive and negative well-being: Implications for quality of life assessment. British J. of Health Psychology 8, 107–122 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Keyes, C.L.M. (ed.): Promoting a life worth living: human development from the vantage points of mental illness and mental health. Sage, CA (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Keyes, C.L.M.: The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. J. of Health and Social Behavior 43, 207–222 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bartneck, C., Forlizzi, J.: A design-centred framework for social human-robot interaction. In: Int. Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 591–594 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Broekens, J., Heerink, M., Rosendal, H.: Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review. Gerontechnology 8, 94–103 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Feil-Seifer, D., Mataric, M.J.: Defining socially assistive robotics. In: 9th Int. Conf. on Rehabilitation Robotics, ICORR 2005, pp. 465–468 (2005) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tapus, A., Mataric, M.J., Scassellati, B.: The grand challenges in socially assistive robotics. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine 14, 35–42 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee, K.M., Jung, Y., Kim, J., Kim, S.R.: Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents?: The effects of physical embodiment, tactile interaction, and people’s loneliness in human-robot interaction. Int. J. of Human-Computer Studies 64, 962–973 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mataric, M.J., Eriksson, J., Feil-Seifer, D.J., Winstein, C.J.: Socially assistive robotics for post-stroke rehabilitation. J. of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 4, 5 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Broadbent, E., Stafford, R., MacDonald, B.: Acceptance of Healthcare Robots for the Older Population: Review and Future Directions. Int. J. of Social Robotics 1, 319–330 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kriglstein, S., Wallner, G.: HOMIE: an artificial companion for elderly people. In: CHI 2005 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2094–2098 (2005) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stiehl, W.D., Lee, J.K., Breazeal, C., Nalin, M., Morandi, A., Sanna, A.: The huggable: a platform for research in robotic companions for pediatric care. In: Proc. of the 8th Int. Conf. on Interaction Design and Children, pp. 317–320 (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dautenhahn, K., Nehaniv, C.L., Walters, M.L., Robins, B., Kose-Bagci, H., Mirza, N.A., Blow, M.: KASPAR - a minimally expressive humanoid robot for human-robot interaction research. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics 6, 369–397 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Libin, A.V., Libin, E.V.: Person-robot interactions from the robopsychologists’ point of view: the robotic psychology and robotherapy approach. Proc. of the IEEE 92, 1789–1803 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wada, K., Shibata, T., Kawaguchi, Y.: Long-term robot therapy in a health service facility for the aged-A case study for 5 years. In: IEEE Int. Conf. on Rehabilitation Robotics, ICORR 2009, pp. 930–933 (2009) Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Taggart, W., Turkle, S., Kidd, C.D.: An interactive robot in a nursing home: Preliminary remarks. In: Towards Social Mechanisms of Android Science, pp. 56–61. Cognitive Science Society, Stresa (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Goris, K., Saldien, J., Lefeber, D.: Probo: a testbed for human robot interaction. In: ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. on Human Robot Interaction, pp. 253–254 (2009) Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    McCarthy, J., Wright, P.: Technology as experience. Interactions 11, 42–43 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shibata, T.: An overview of human interactive robots for psychological enrichment. Proc. of the IEEE 92, 1749–1758 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shibata, T., Wada, K., Ikeda, Y., Sabanovic, S.: Cross-cultural studies on subjective evaluation of a seal robot. Advanced Robotics 23, 443–458 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    De Schutter, B., Vanden Abeele, V.: Meaningful play in elderly life. In: Annual Meeting of the Int. Communication Association (2008) Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    MacDorman, K.F., Ishiguro, H.: The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research. Interaction Studies 7, 297–337 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Heerink, M., Ben, K., Evers, V., Wielinga, B.: The influence of social presence on acceptance of a companion robot by older people. J. of Physical Agents 2, 33–40 (2008)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kidd, C.D., Taggart, W., Turkle, S.: A sociable robot to encourage social interaction among the elderly. In: Proc. of the 2006 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 3972–3976 (2006) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Suzanne Hutson
    • 1
  • Soo Ling Lim
    • 2
  • Peter J. Bentley
    • 2
  • Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze
    • 1
  • Ann Bowling
    • 3
  1. 1.UCLICUniversity CollegeLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity CollegeLondonUK
  3. 3.Department of Primary Care and Population SciencesUniversity CollegeLondonUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations