Advertisement

Predicting Learner Engagement during Well-Defined and Ill-Defined Computer-Based Intercultural Interactions

  • Benjamin S. Goldberg
  • Robert A. Sottilare
  • Keith W. Brawner
  • Heather K. Holden
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6974)

Abstract

This article reviews the first of two experiments investigating the effect tailoring of training content has on a learner’s perceived engagement, and to examine the influence the Big Five Personality Test and the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) mood dimensions have on these outcome measures. A secondary objective is to then correlate signals from physiological sensors and other variables of interest, and to develop a model of learner engagement. Self-reported measures were derived from the engagement index of the Independent Television Commission-Sense of Presence Inventory (ITC-SOPI). Physiological measures were based on the commercial Emotiv Epoc Electroencephalograph (EEG) brain-computer interface. Analysis shows personality factors to be reliable predictors of general engagement within well-defined and ill-defined tasks, and could be used to tailor instructional strategies where engagement was predicted to be non-optimal. It was also evident that Emotiv provides reliable measures of engagement and excitement in near real-time.

Keywords

learner engagement well-defined tasks ill-defined tasks EEG 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Woolf, B., Burleson, W., Arroyo, I., Dragon, T., Cooper, D., Picard, R.: Affect-Aware Tutors: Recognizing and Responding to Student Affect. International Journal of Learning Technology 4, 129–164 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stevens, R.H., Galloway, T., Berka, C.: Integrating Innovative Neuro-Educational Technologies (I-Net) into K-12 Science Classrooms. In: Schmorrow, D., Reeves, L. (eds.) HCII 2007 and FAC 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4565, pp. 47–56. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berka, C., Levendowski, D.J., Lumicao, M.N., Yau, A., Davis, G., Zivkovic, V.T., Olmstead, R.E., Tremoulet, P.D., Craven, P.L.: EEG Correlates of Task Engagement and Mental Workload in Vigilance, Learning, and Memory Tasks. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine 78(5), B231–B244 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rowe, J., Shores, L., Mott, B., Lester, J.: Integrating Learning and Engagement in Narrative-Centered Learning Environments. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Pittsburgh, pp. 166–177 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Peters, C., Asteriadis, S., Rebolledo-mendez, G.: Modelling user attention for human-agent interaction. In: 10th Workshop on Image Analysis for Multimedia Interactive Services, pp. 266–269 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carini, R.M., Kuh, G.D., Klein, S.P.: Student Engagement and Student Learning: Testing the Linkages. Research in Higher Education 47(1), 1–32 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wade, S., Buxton, W., Kelly, M.: Using Think-Alouds to Examine Reader-Text Interest. Reading Research Quarterly 34, 194–216 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dragon, T., Arroyo, I., Woolf, B.P., Burleson, W., el Kaliouby, R., Eydgahi, H.: Viewing Student Affect and Learning through Classroom Observation and Physical Sensors. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds.) ITS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5091, pp. 29–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McCrae, R.R., John, O.P.: An Introduction to the Five-Factor Model and Its Applications. Special Issue: The Five-Factor Model: Issues and Applications. Journal of Personality 60, 175–215 (1992)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tang, A., Biocca, F., Lim, L.: Comparing Differences in Presence During Social Interaction in Augmented Reality Versus Virtual Reality Environments: An Exploratory Study. In: 7th International Workshop on Presence, Valencia, Spain (2004) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lombard, M., Ditton, T.B., Weinstein, L.: Measuring (Tele)Presence: The Temple Presence Inventory. In: Twelfth International Workshop on Presence, Los Angeles, California, USA (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lessiter, J., Freeman, J., Keogh, E., Davidoff, J.: A Cross-Media Presence Questionnaire: the ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory. Presence 10(3), 282–297 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Inventado, P.S., Legaspi, R., Bui, T.D., Suarez, M.: Predicting Student’s Appraisal of Feedback in an ITS Using Previous Affective States and Continuous Affect Labels from EEG Data. In: Wong, S.L., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computers in Education, Putrajaya, Malaysia (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    American Electroencephalographic Society Guidelines for Standard Electrode Position Nomenclature. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 8, 200–202 (2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bradley, M.M., Lang, P.J.: Measuring emotion: The Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 25(1), 49–59 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mehrabian, A.: Pleasure-Arousal-Dominance: A General Framework for Describing and Measuring Individual Differences in Temperament. Current Psychology 14, 261–292 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fairclough, S.H., Venables, L.: Prediction of Subjective States from Psychophysiology: A Multivariate Approach. Biological Psychology 71, 100–110 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chaouachi, M., Chalfoun, P., Jraidi, I., Frasson, C.: Affect and Mental Engagement: Towards Adaptability for Intelligent Systems. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International FLAIRS Conference. AAAI Press, Daytona Beach (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Koutepova, T., Liu, Y., Lan, X., Jeong, J.: Enhancing Video Games in Real Time with Biofeedback Data. In: SIGGRAPH Asia, Seoul (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang, L.: Thinking Styles and the Big Five Personality Traits Revisited. Personality and Individual Differences 40, 1177–1187 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benjamin S. Goldberg
    • 1
  • Robert A. Sottilare
    • 1
  • Keith W. Brawner
    • 1
  • Heather K. Holden
    • 1
  1. 1.United States Army Research Laboratory Human Research and Engineering Directorate Simulation and Training Technology CenterOrlandoUSA

Personalised recommendations