Advertisement

The Dynamics between Student Affect and Behavior Occurring Outside of Educational Software

  • Ryan S. J. d. Baker
  • Gregory R. Moore
  • Angela Z. Wagner
  • Jessica Kalka
  • Aatish Salvi
  • Michael Karabinos
  • Colin A. Ashe
  • David Yaron
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6974)

Abstract

We present an analysis of the affect that precedes, follows, and co- occurs with students’ choices to go off-task or engage in on-task conversation within two versions of a virtual laboratory for chemistry. This analysis is conducted using field observation data collected within undergraduate classes using the virtual laboratory software as part of their regular chemistry classes. We find that off-task behavior co-occurs with boredom, but appears to relieve boredom, leading to significantly lower probability of later boredom. We also find that on-task conversation leads to greater future probability of engaged concentration. These results help to clarify the role that behavior outside of educational software plays in students’ affect during use of that software.

Keywords

Affect dynamics off-task behavior virtual laboratory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Baker, R.S.d.J., D’Mello, S., Rodrigo, M.M.T., Graesser, A.C.: Better to be Frustrated than Bored: The Incidence, Persistence, and Impact of Learners’ Cognitive-Affective States During Interactions with Three Different Computer-Based Learning Environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68(4), 223–241 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baker, R.S.J.d., Corbett, A.T., Wagner, A.Z.: Human Classification of Low-Fidelity Replays of Student Actions. In: Proceedings of the Educational Data Mining Workshop at the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 29–36 (2009) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baker, R.S., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R., Wagner, A.Z.: Off-Task Behavior in the Cognitive Tutor Classroom: When Students “Game the System”. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI 2004: Computer-Human Interaction, pp. 383–390 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bartel, C.A., Saavedra, R.: The Collective Construction of Work Group Moods. Administrative Science Quarterly 45(2), 197–231 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D’Mello, S., Graesser, A.: Modeling Cognitive-Affective Dynamics with Hidden Markov Models. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Cognitive Science Society, pp. 2721–2726 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D’Mello, S.K., Taylor, R., Graesser, A.C.: Monitoring affective trajectories during complex learning. In: Proc. of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society, pp. 203–208 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Finn, J.D.: Withdrawing From School. Review of Educational Research 59(2), 117–142 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karweit, N., Slavin, R.E.: Time-On-Task: Issues of Timing, Sampling, and Definition. Journal of Experimental Psychology 74(6), 844–851 (1982)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kort, B., Reilly, R., Picard, R.: An affective model of the interplay between emotions and learning. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Int’l Conf. on Advanced Learning Technologies (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kreijns, K.: Sociable CSCL environments: Social affordances, sociability, and social presence. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands (2004) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lahaderne, H.M.: Attitudinal and Intellectual Correlates of Attention: A Study of Four Sixth-Grade Classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology 59(5), 320–324 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Larson, R.W., Richards, M.H.: Boredom in the Middle School Years: Blaming Schools Versus Blaming Students. American Journal of Education 99(4), 418–443 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee, S.W., Kelly, K.E., Nyre, J.E.: Preliminary Report on the Relation of Students’ On Task Behavior With Completion of School Work. Psychological Reports 84, 267–272 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Litman, D.J., Forbes-Riley, K.: Predicting student emotions in computer-human tutoring dialogues. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 352–359 (2004) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    McQuiggan, S.W., Robison, J.L., Lester, J.C.: Affective Transitions in Narrative- Centered Learning Environments. Educational Technology & Society 13(1), 40–53 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nottelmann, E.D., Hill, K.T.: Test Anxiety and Off-Task Behavior in Evaluative Situations. Child Development 48(1), 225–231 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L.M., Stupnisky, R.H., Perry, R.P.: Boredom in Achievement Settings: Exploring Control-Value Antecedents and Performance Outcomes of a Neglected Emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology 102(3), 531–549 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Planalp, S., DeFrancisco, V.L., Rutherford, D.: Varieties of Cues to Emotion in Naturally Occurring Settings. Cognition and Emotion 10(2), 137–153 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rodrigo, M.M.T., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Baker, R.S.J.d., du Boulay, B., Sugay, J.O., Lim, S.A.L., Espejo-Lahoz, M.B., Luckin, R. The Effects of Motivational Modeling on Affect in an Intelligent Tutoring System. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Education, pp. 57–64 (2008) Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sabourin, J., Rowe, J., Mott, B., Lester, J.: When Off-Task in On-Task: The Affective Role of Off-Task Behavior in Narrative-Centered Learning Environments. In: Biswas, G., Bull, S., Kay, J., Mitrovic, A. (eds.) AIED 2011. LNCS, vol. 6738, pp. 534–536. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sao Pedro, M.A., Gobert, J.D., Raziuddin, J.J.: Comparing pedagogical approaches for the acquisition and long-term robustness of the control of variables strategy. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, pp. 1024–1031 (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schofield, J.W.: Computers and Classroom Culture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tobin, T.J., Sugai, G.M.: Using Sixth-Grade School Records to Predict School Violence, Chronic Discipline Problems, and High School Outcomes. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders 7(1), 40–53 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yaron, D., Karabinos, M., Lange, D., Greeno, J.G., Leinhardt, G.: The ChemCollective: Virtual labs and online activities for introductory chemistry courses. Science 328, 584–585 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryan S. J. d. Baker
    • 1
  • Gregory R. Moore
    • 1
  • Angela Z. Wagner
    • 2
  • Jessica Kalka
    • 2
  • Aatish Salvi
    • 1
  • Michael Karabinos
    • 3
  • Colin A. Ashe
    • 3
  • David Yaron
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Social Science and Policy StudiesWorcester Polytechnic InstituteWorcesterUSA
  2. 2.Human-Computer Interaction InstituteCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA
  3. 3.Department of ChemistryCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations