Affective Preference from Physiology in Videogames: A Lesson Learned from the TORCS Experiment

  • Maurizio Garbarino
  • Matteo Matteucci
  • Andrea Bonarini
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6975)

Abstract

In this paper we discuss several issues arisen during our most recent experiment concerning the estimation of player preference from physiological signals during a car racing game, to share our experience with the community and provide some insights on the experimental process. We present a selection of critical aspects that range from the choice of the task, to the definition of the questionnaire, to data acquisition.

Thanks to the experience gained during the mentioned case study, we can give an extensive picture of which aspects can be considered in the design of similar experiments. The goal of this contribution is to provide guidelines for analogous experiments.

Keywords

preference evaluation physiological signals emotion in games experimental setting 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cacioppo, J., Tassinary, L., Berntson, G.: Psychophysiological science. In: Handbook of Psychophysiology, vol. 2, pp. 3–23 (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Picard, R., Vyzas, E., Healey, J.: Toward machine emotional intelligence: Analysis of affective physiological state. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1175–1191 (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Calvo, R., D’Mello, S.: Affect detection: An interdisciplinary review of models, methods, and their applications. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 18–37 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tognetti, S., Garbarino, M., Bonarini, A., Matteucci, M.: Modeling player enjoyment from physiological responses in a car racing game. In: Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games (August 2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    The open racing car simulator website, http://torcs.sourceforge.net/
  6. 6.
    Tognetti, S., Garbarino, M., Bonarini, A., Matteucci, M.: Enjoyment recognition from physiological data in a car racing game. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Affective Interaction in Natural Environments, AFFINE 2010, pp. 3–8. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tognetti, S., Garbarino, M., Bonarini, A., Matteucci, M.: The affective triad: stimuli, questionnaires and measurements. In: D´Mello, S., et al. (eds.) ACII 2011, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6975, pp. 101–110. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yannakakis, G., Hallam, J., Lund, H.: Entertainment capture through heart rate activity in physical interactive playgrounds. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 18(1), 207–243 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nacke, L., Lindley, C., Stellmach, S.: Log whos playing: psychophysiological game analysis made easy through event logging. Fun and Games, 150–157 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mandryk, R., Inkpen, K., Valvert, T.: Using psychophysiological techniques to measure user experience with entertainment technologies. Behaviour & Information Technology 25(2), 141–158 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maurizio Garbarino
    • 1
  • Matteo Matteucci
    • 1
  • Andrea Bonarini
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Elettronica e InformazionePolitecnico di Milano, IIT UnitMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations