Automated Model-to-Metamodel Transformations Based on the Concepts of Deep Instantiation

  • Gerd Kainz
  • Christian Buckl
  • Alois Knoll
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6981)

Abstract

Numerous systems, especially component-based systems, are based on a multi-phase development process where an ontological hierarchy is established. Solutions based on modeling / metamodeling can be used for such systems, but all of them are afflicted with different drawbacks. The main problem is that elements representing both CLAsses and oBJECTs (clabjects), which are needed to specify an ontological hierarchy, are not supported by standard metamodeling frameworks. This paper presents the combination of two approaches, namely deep instantiation and model-to-metamodel transformations. The resulting approach combines the clean and compact specification of deep instantiation with the easy applicability of model-to-metamodel transformations in an automated way. Along with this a set of generic operators to specify these transformations is identified.

Keywords

Model-to-Metamodel (M2MM) Model-to-Model (M2M) Model Transformation Deep Instantiation Transformation Operator Clabject Model-Driven Software Development (MDSD) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bézivin, J.: In search of a basic principle for model driven engineering. UPGRADE- The European Journal for the Informatics Professional 5(2), 21–24 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atkinson, C., Kühne, T.: The essence of multilevel metamodeling. In: Gogolla, M., Kobryn, C. (eds.) UML 2001. LNCS, vol. 2185, pp. 19–33. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kainz, G., Buckl, C., Sommer, S., Knoll, A.: Model-to-metamodel transformation for the development of component-based systems. In: Petriu, D.C., Rouquette, N., Haugen, Ø. (eds.) MODELS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6395, pp. 391–405. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Atkinson, C.: Meta-modeling for distributed object environments. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Enterprise Distributed Object Computing, EDOC 1997, Washington, USA, pp. 90–101 (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Atkinson, C., Kühne, T.: Model-driven development: A metamodeling foundation. IEEE Software 20(5), 36–41 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eker, J., Janneck, J., Lee, E.A., Liu, J., Liu, X., Ludvig, J., Sachs, S., Xiong, Y.: Taming heterogeneity - the ptolemy approach. Proceedings of the IEEE 91(1), 127–144 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kühne, T., Schreiber, D.: Can programming be liberated from the two-level style: multi-level programming with deepjava. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems and Applications. OOPSLA 2007, Montreal, Canada, pp. 229–244 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Atkinson, C., Kühne, T.: Processes and products in a multi-level metamodeling architecture. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering 11(6), 761–783 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gutheil, M., Kennel, B., Atkinson, C.: A systematic approach to connectors in a multi-level modeling environment. In: Busch, C., Ober, I., Bruel, J.-M., Uhl, A., Völter, M. (eds.) MODELS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5301, pp. 843–857. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Odell, J.: Power types. Journal of Object-Oriented Programming 7(2), 8–12 (1994)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Martin, J., Odell, J.J.: Object-oriented methods: a foundation, UMLed, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1998)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bragança, A., Machado, R.J.: Transformation patterns for multi-staged model driven software development. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Software Product Line Conference, SPLC 2008, Washington, USA, pp. 329–338 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Object Management Group (OMG): Meta Object Facility (MOF) Core Specification Version 2.0 (January 2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Steinberg, D., Budinsky, F., Paternostro, M., Merks, E.: EMF: Eclipse Modeling Framework. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerd Kainz
    • 1
  • Christian Buckl
    • 1
  • Alois Knoll
    • 2
  1. 1.fortiss, Cyber-Physical SystemsMunichGermany
  2. 2.Faculty of InformaticsTechnische Universität MünchenGarchingGermany

Personalised recommendations