Making Sense in the Margins: A Field Study of Annotation

  • James Blustein
  • David Rowe
  • Ann-Barbara Graff
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6966)

Abstract

We report on three years of data collected in the field from students in graduate and undergraduate seminars at two universities. The students annotated texts for discussion in classes where hypertext and computer interfaces were core topics. The results of our analysis show how annotation style changes with a combination of experience and study of material related to annotation. Our major conclusions are that there are essentially six purposes for scholarly user-readers to annotate; and support for textual glosses is a necessary part of any successful annotation technology for such use. Our study suggests tools that will be appreciated by e-text users.

Keywords

Digital Library Active Reader Textual Annotation Casual Mark Passive Reader 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adler, M.J., van Doren, C.: How to Read a Book: The Classic Guide to Intelligent Reading. Simon & Schuster, Inc., Toronto (1972)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Black, A., Wright, P., Black, D., Norman, K.: Consulting on-line dictionary information while reading. Hypermedia 4(3) (1992)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bradley, J., Vetch, P.: Supporting annotation as a scholarly tool—experiences from the online Chopin Variorum edition. Lit. and Ling. Comput. 22(2), 225–241 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Charney, D.: The effect of hypertext on processes of reading and writing. In: Selfe, C.L., Hilligoss, S. (eds.) Literacy and Computers, The MLA (1994)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coleridge, S.T.: Rime of the Ancient Mariner. Dover, New York (1970); [The 1817 edition (with marginal gloss); illustrated by Gustave Dore (1870)]Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Crowder, R.G., Wagner, R.K.: The Psychology of Reading: An Introduction, 2nd edn. Oxford U. Press, Oxford (1992)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dillon, A.: Spatial-semantics: How users derive shape from information space. JASIS 51(6), 521–528 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Golovchinsky, G.: Reading in the office. In: BooksOnline 2008, pp. 21–24 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gowers, E., Greenbaum, S., Whitcut, J.: The Complete Plain Words. Penguin (1987)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hauptman, R.: Documentation. McFarland & Co., Inc. (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hoffmann, R., McGuire, S.: Learning and teaching strategies. Amer. Scientist 98, 378–382 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jackson, H.J.: Marginalia: Reader’s Writing in Books. Yale U. Press (2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kelly-Bootle, S.: It takes two to intuit. Comp. Lang. (August 1989)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lipking, L.: The marginal gloss. Critical Inquiry 3(4), 609–655 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mangen, A.: Hypertext fiction reading: haptics and immersion. J. Res. in Reading 31, 404–419 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mangen, A., Velay, J.L.: Digitizing literacy: Reflections on the haptics of writing. In: Zadeh, M.H. (ed.) Advances in Haptics ch. 20, pp. 385–401. InTech (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marshall, C.C.: Annotation: from paper books to the digital library. In: Witten, et al. (eds.) ACM Dig. Libs., pp. 131–140 (1998)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marshall, C.C.: Toward an ecology of hypertext annotation. In: Grønbæk, et al. (eds.) ACM HT, pp. 40–49 (1998)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Marshall, C.C.: Reading and writing the electronic book. Morgan & Claypool (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Marshall, C.C., Brush, A.J.B.: Exploring the relationship between personal and public annotations. In: JCDL 2004 (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    McKendree, J., Reader, W., Hammon, N.: The “homeopathic fallacy” in learning from hypertext. Interactions ii(3) (July 1995)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Molotch, H.: Leaps and visions. In: Where Stuff Comes From, pp. 68–71. Taylor & Francis, Abington (2003)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Molotch, H.: The semiotic handle. In: Where Stuff Comes From, pp. 25, 82–84Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Piolat, A., Olive, T., Kellogg, R.T.: Cognitive effort during note taking. App. Cog. Psych. 19, 291–312 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Qayyum, A.: Analysing markings made on e-documents. Can. J. Inf. & Lib. Sci. 32(1/2), 35–53 (2008)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wolfe, J.: Annotations and the collaborative digital library. Int. J. of CSCL 3(2), 141–164 (2008)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wolfe, J.L., Neuwirth, C.M.: From the margins to the center: The future of annotation. J. Bus. and Tech. Comm. 15, 333–371 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Blustein
    • 1
    • 2
  • David Rowe
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ann-Barbara Graff
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Faculty of Computer Sci. & School of Info. Mgmt.Dalhousie UniversityCanada
  2. 2.Hypertext Augmenting Intelligent Knowledge Use (HAIKU) ProjectCanada
  3. 3.Faculty of Computer ScienceDalhousie UniversityCanada
  4. 4.English StudiesNipissing UniversityCanada

Personalised recommendations