Reconstructing One-Mode Three-way Asymmetric Data for Multidimensional Scaling

Conference paper
Part of the Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization book series (STUDIES CLASS)

Abstract

Some models have been proposed to analyze one-mode three-way data [e.g. De Rooij and Gower (J Classification 20:181–220, 2003), De Rooij and Heiser (Br J Math Stat Psychol 53:99–119, 2000)]. These models usually assume triadic symmetric relationships. Therefore, it is general to transform asymmetric data into symmetric proximity data when one-mode three-way asymmetric proximity data are analyzed using multidimensional scaling. However, valuable information among objects is lost by symmetrizing asymmetric proximity data. It is necessary to devise this transformation so that valuable information among objects is not lost. In one-mode two-way asymmetric data, a method that the overall sum of the rows and columns are equal was proposed by Harshman et al. (Market Sci 1:205–242, 1982). Their method is effective to analyze the data that have differences among the overall sum of the rows and columns caused by external factors. Therefore, the present study proposes a method that extends (Harshman et al., Market Sci 1:205–242, 1982) method to one-mode three-way asymmetric proximity data. The proposed method reconstructs one-mode three-way asymmetric data so that the overall sum of the rows, columns and depths is made equal.

Keywords

Asymmetric Model Easy Understanding Proximity Data Access Analysis Triadic Relationship 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. De Rooij M, Gower JC (2003) The geometry of triadic distances. J Classification 20:181–220MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. De Rooij M, Heiser WJ (2000) Triadic distances models for the analysis of asymmetric three-way proximity data. Br J Math Stat Psychol 53:99–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Harshman RA, Green PE, Wind Y, Lundy ME (1982) A model for the analysis of asymmetric data in marketing research. Market Sci 1:205–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Okada A, Imaizumi T (1987) Nonmetric multidimensional scaling of asymmetric proximities. Behaviormetrika 21:81–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Saburi S, Chino N (2008) A maximum likelihood method for an asymmetric MDS model. Comput Stat Data Anal 52:4673–4684MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Upton GJG (1978) The analysis of cross-tabulated data. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  7. Yokoyama S, Okada A (2006) Rescaling a proximity matrix using entropy in brand-switching data. Jpn J Behaviormetrics 33:159–166MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Yokoyama S, Okada A (2007) Rescaling proximity matrix using entropy analyzed by INDSCAL. In: Decker R, Lenz HJ (eds) Advances in data analysis. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, pp 327–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Zielman B, Heiser WJ (1993) Analysis of asymmetry by a slide vector. Psychometrika 58:101–114MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Social SciencesTokyo Metropolitan UniversityHachioji-shiJapan
  2. 2.Graduate School of Management and Information SciencesTama UniversityTama-shiJapan

Personalised recommendations