Framing the Conundrum of Total Cost of Ownership of Open Source Software

  • Maha Shaikh
  • Tony Cornford
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 365)

Abstract

This paper reflects the results of phase I of our study on the total cost of ownership (TCO) of open source software adoption. Not only have we found TCO to be an intriguing issue but it is contentious, baffling and each company approaches it in a distinctive manner (and sometimes not at all). In effect it is a conundrum that needs unpacking before it can be explained and understood. Our paper discusses the components of TCO as total cost of ownership and total cost of acquisition (and besides). Using this broad dichotomy and its various components we then analyze our data to make sense of procurement decisions in relation to open source software in the public sector and private companies.

Keywords

open source software total cost of ownership benefits exit costs software adoption 

References

  1. 1.
    Ellram, L.M.: A Taxonomy of Total Cost of Ownership Model. Journal of Business Logistics 15, 171–191 (1994)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ellram, L.M.: Total cost of ownership an analysis approach for purchasing. Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics 25, 4–23 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ellram, L.M., Siferd, S.P.: Total Cost of Ownership: A Key Concept in Strategic Cost Management Decisions. Journal of Business Logistics 19, 55–84 (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hurkens, K., van der Valk, W., Wynstra, F.: Total Cost of Ownership in the Services Sector: A Case Study. The Journal of Supply Chain Management 42, 27–37 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    MacCormack, A.: Evaluating Total Cost of Ownership for Software Platforms: Comparing Apples, Oranges, and Cucumbers. AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies Series (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ellram, L.M.: A Framework for Total Cost of Ownership. The International Journal of Logistics Management 4, 46–60 (1993)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wouters, M.J.F., Anderson, J.C., Wynstra, F.: The Adoption of Total Cost of Ownership for Sourcing Decisions - A Structural Equations Analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society 30, 167–191 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lerner, J., Schankerman, M.: The Comingled Code: Open Source and Economic Development. MIT Press, Hong Kong (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carr, L.P., Ittner, C.D.: Measuring the Cost of Ownership. Journal of Cost Management 6, 42–51 (1992)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Russo, B., Succi, G.: A Cost Model of Open Source Software Adoption. In: IJOSSP, pp. 60–82 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sutor, R.: Managing open source adoption in your IT organization (2009), http://www.sutor.com/newsite/blog-open/?p=3260
  12. 12.
    Galoppini, R.: Open Source TCO: Total Cost of Ownership and the Fermat’s Theorem (2009), http://robertogaloppini.net/2009/01/08/open-source-tco-total-cost-of-ownership-and-the-fermats-theorem/
  13. 13.
    Burkhardt, R.: Seven Predictions for Open Source in (2009), http://it.sys-con.com/node/797241
  14. 14.
    Wheeler, D.A.: Why Open Source Software / Free Software (OSS/FS, FLOSS, or FOSS)? Look at the Numbers (2007), http://www.dwheeler.com/oss_fs_why.html
  15. 15.
    Phipps, S.: Open Source Procurement: Subscriptions. In: Computer World, UK (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zuliani, P., Succi, G.: Migrating public administrations to open source software. In: E-society IADIS International Conference, Avila, Spain, pp. 829–832 (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zuliani, P., Succi, G.: An Experience of Transition to Open Source Software in Local Authorities. In: e-Challenges on Software Engineering, Vienna, Austria (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dinkelacker, J., Garg, P., Miller, R., Nelson, D.: Progressive Open Source, Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, California HPL-2001-233 (September 28, 2001) Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dahlander, L.: Penguin in a newsuit: a tale of how de novo entrants emerged to harness free and open source software communities. Industrial and Corporate Change 16, 913–943 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fitzgerald, B.: The Transformation of Open Source Software. MIS Quarterly 30, 587–598 (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    O’Mahony, S., Diaz, F.C., Mamas, E.: IBM and Eclipse (A), Harvard Business Review Case Study, December 16 (2005)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    West, J., Gallagher, S.: Challenges of Open Innovation: The Paradox of Firm Investment in Open Source Software. R&D Management 36, 315–328 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    West, J.: How Open is Open Enough? Melding Proprietary and Open Source Platform Strategies. Research Policy 32, 1259–1285 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Tucci, C.L.: Clarifying Business Models: Origins, Present, and Future of the Concept. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 15, 1–40 (2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing. Journal of Marketing 68, 1–17 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Agerfalk, P., Fitzgerald, B.: Outsourcing to an Unknown Workforce: Exploring Opensourcing as a Global Sourcing Strategy. MIS Quarterly 32, 385–400 (2008)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shaikh, M., Cornford, T.: Understanding Commercial Open Source as Product and Service Innovation. In: 2011 Academy of Management Annual Meeting, San Antonio, Texas, USA (2011)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
    Shaikh, M., Cornford, T.: Letting Go of Control to Embrace Open Source: Implications for Company and Community. In: The Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Koloa, Kauai, Hawaii, USA, vol. 43 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maha Shaikh
    • 1
  • Tony Cornford
    • 1
  1. 1.Information Systems and Innovation GroupLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUK

Personalised recommendations