Datalog-Based Program Analysis with BES and RWL

  • María Alpuente
  • Marco Antonio Feliú
  • Christophe Joubert
  • Alicia Villanueva
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6702)

Abstract

This paper describes two techniques for Datalog query evaluation and their application to object-oriented program analysis. The first technique transforms Datalog programs into an implicit Boolean Equation System (Bes) that can then be solved by using linear-time complexity algorithms that are available in existing, general purpose verification toolboxes such as Cadp. In order to improve scalability and to enable analyses involving advanced meta-programming features, we develop a second methodology that transforms Datalog programs into rewriting logic (Rwl) theories. This method takes advantage of the preeminent features and facilities that are available within the high-performance system Maude, which provides a very efficient implementation of Rwl. We provide evidence of the practicality of both approaches by reporting on some experiments with a number of real-world Datalog-based analyses.

Keywords

Model Check Logic Program Logic Programming Boolean Variable Datalog Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Afrati, F.N., Ullman, J.D.: Optimizing joins in a map-reduce environment. In: Manolescu, I., Spaccapietra, S., Teubner, J., Kitsuregawa, M., Léger, A., Naumann, F., Ailamaki, A., Özcan, F. (eds.) EDBT. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, vol. 426, pp. 99–110. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alpuente, M., Feliú, M., Joubert, C., Villanueva, A.: Defining Datalog in Rewriting Logic. Technical Report DSIC-II/07/09, DSIC, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alpuente, M., Feliú, M., Joubert, C., Villanueva, A.: Using Datalog and Boolean Equation Systems for Program Analysis. In: Cofer, D., Fantechi, A. (eds.) FMICS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5596, pp. 215–231. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alpuente, M., Feliú, M.A., Joubert, C., Villanueva, A.: Defining datalog in rewriting logic. In: De Schreye, D. (ed.) LOPSTR 2009. LNCS, vol. 6037, pp. 188–204. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Andersen, H.R.: Model checking and boolean graphs. Theoretical Computer Science 126(1), 3–30 (1994)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bancilhon, F., Maier, D., Sagiv, Y., Ullman, J.D.: Magic Sets and Other Strange Ways to Implement Logic Programs. In: Proc. 5th ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD Symp. on Principles of Database Systems, PODS 1986, pp. 1–15. ACM Press, New York (1986)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ceri, S., Gottlob, G., Tanca, L.: Logic Programming and Databases. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen, T., Ploeger, B., van de Pol, J., Willemse, T.A.C.: Equivalence Checking for Infinite Systems Using Parameterized Boolean Equation Systems. In: Caires, L., Vasconcelos, V.T. (eds.) CONCUR 2007. LNCS, vol. 4703, pp. 120–135. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clavel, M., Durán, F., Ejer, S., Lincoln, P., Martí-Oliet, N., Meseguer, J., Talcott, C.: All About Maude - A High-Performance Logical Framework. LNCS, vol. 4350. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dam, A., Ploeger, B., Willemse, T.: Instantiation for Parameterised Boolean Equation Systems. In: Fitzgerald, J.S., Haxthausen, A.E., Yenigun, H. (eds.) ICTAC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5160, pp. 440–454. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    de Moor, O., Sereni, D., Verbaere, M., Hajiyev, E., Avgustinov, P., Ekman, T., Ongkingco, N., Tibble, J.: QL: Object-oriented queries made easy. In: Lämmel, R., Visser, J., Saraiva, J. (eds.) GTTSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5235, pp. 78–133. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Feliú, M., Joubert, C., Tarín, F.: Efficient BES-based Bottom-Up Evaluation of Datalog Programs. In: Gulías, V., Silva, J., Villanueva, A. (eds.) Proc. X Jornadas sobre Programación y Lenguajes (PROLE 2010), Garceta, pp. 165–176 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Feliú, M., Joubert, C., Tarín, F.: Evaluation strategies for datalog-based points-to analysis. In: Bendisposto, J., Leuschel, M., Roggenbach, M. (eds.) Proc. 10th Workshop on Automated Verification of Critical Systems (AVoCS 2010), pp. 88–103. Technical Report of Düsseldorf University (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Garavel, H., Mateescu, R., Lang, F., Serwe, W.: CADP 2006: A Toolbox for the Construction and Analysis of Distributed Processes. In: Damm, W., Hermanns, H. (eds.) CAV 2007. LNCS, vol. 4590, pp. 158–163. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hajiyev, E., Verbaere, M., de Moor, O.: CodeQuest: Scalable Source Code Queries with Datalog. In: Hu, Q. (ed.) ECOOP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4067, pp. 2–27. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hanus, M.: The Integration of Functions into Logic Programming: From Theory to Practice. Journal on Logic Programming 19 & 20, 583–628 (1994)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Joubert, C., Mateescu, R.: Distributed On-the-Fly Model Checking and Test Case Generation. In: Valmari, A. (ed.) SPIN 2006. LNCS, vol. 3925, pp. 126–145. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leeuwen, J. (ed.): Formal Models and Semantics, vol. B. Elsevier, The MIT Press (1990)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu, X., Smolka, S.A.: Simple Linear-Time Algorithms for Minimal Fixed Points. In: Larsen, K.G., Skyum, S., Winskel, G. (eds.) ICALP 1998. LNCS, vol. 1443, pp. 53–66. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu, Y.A., Stoller, S.D.: From datalog rules to efficient programs with time and space guarantees. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 31(6) (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Livshits, B., Whaley, J., Lam, M.: Reflection Analysis for Java. In: Yi, K. (ed.) APLAS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3780, pp. 139–160. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Marchiori, M.: Logic Programs as Term Rewriting Systems. In: Rodríguez-Artalejo, M., Levi, G. (eds.) ALP 1994. LNCS, vol. 850, pp. 223–241. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mateescu, R.: Local Model-Checking of an Alternation-Free Value-Based Modal Mu-Calculus. In: Proc. 2nd Int’l Workshop on Verication, Model Checking and Abstract Interpretation, VMCAI 1998 (1998)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mateescu, R., Thivolle, D.: A Model Checking Language for Concurrent Value-Passing Systems. In: Cuellar, J., Sere, K. (eds.) FM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5014, pp. 148–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Meseguer, J.: Conditional Rewriting Logic as a Unified Model of Concurrency. Theoretical Computer Science 96(1), 73–155 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Meseguer, J.: Membership algebra as a logical framework for equational specification. In: Parisi-Presicce, F. (ed.) WADT 1997. LNCS, vol. 1376, pp. 18–61. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Reddy, U.: Transformation of Logic Programs into Functional Programs. In: Proc. Symposium on Logic Programming (SLP 1984), pp. 187–197. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1984)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Reps, T.W.: Solving Demand Versions of Interprocedural Analysis Problems. In: Adsul, B. (ed.) CC 1994. LNCS, vol. 786, pp. 389–403. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rosu, G., Havelund, K.: Rewriting-Based Techniques for Runtime Verification. Autom. Softw. Eng. 12(2), 151–197 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schneider-Kamp, P., Giesl, J., Serebrenik, A., Thiemann, R.: Automated Termination Analysis for Logic Programs by Term Rewriting. In: Puebla, G. (ed.) LOPSTR 2006. LNCS, vol. 4407, pp. 177–193. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ullman, J.D.: Principles of Database and Knowledge-Base Systems, Volume I and II, The New Technologies. Computer Science Press, Rockville (1989)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vieille, L.: Recursive Axioms in Deductive Databases: The Query/Subquery Approach. In: Proc. 1st Int’l Conf. on Expert Database Systems, EDS 1986, pp. 253–267 (1986)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Whaley, J.: Joeq: a Virtual Machine and Compiler Infrastructure. In: Proc. Workshop on Interpreters, Virtual Machines and Emulators, IVME 2003, pp. 58–66. ACM Press, New York (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Whaley, J., Avots, D., Carbin, M., Lam, M.S.: Using Datalog with Binary Decision Diagrams for Program Analysis. In: Yi, K. (ed.) APLAS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3780, pp. 97–118. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zheng, X., Rugina, R.: Demand-driven alias analysis for C. In: Proc. 35th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symp. on Principles of Programming Languages, POPL 2008, pp. 197–208. ACM Press, New York (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • María Alpuente
    • 1
  • Marco Antonio Feliú
    • 1
  • Christophe Joubert
    • 1
  • Alicia Villanueva
    • 1
  1. 1.DSIC / ELPUniversidad Politécnica de ValenciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations