Advertisement

Discovering the Sensor Web through Mobile Applications

  • Theodor Foerster
  • Daniel Nüst
  • Arne Bröring
  • Simon Jirka
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)

Abstract

Sensor data is crucial for mobile applications to support the user in the field. Several mobile applications are available for accessing such sensor data. However, a comprehensive approach for discovering such sensor data in the Sensor Web according to the user’s context (i.e. the location) has not been proposed yet. This article describes an approach for discovering data and services in the Sensor Web through mobile applications. The approach is demonstrated by an air quality scenario and is implemented based on Free and Open Source Software.

Keywords

Sensor web mobile applications sensor discovery air quality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abowd, G.,Atkeson, C., Hong, J., Long, S., Kooper, R., & Pinkerton, M. (1997). Cyberguide: A mobile context-aware tour guide. Wireless Networks, 3, 421–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Botts, M., & Robin, A. (2007). Sensor Model Language (Implementation specification No. 07-000). Wayland, MA, USA: OGC. Retrieved from http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/sensorMLGoogle Scholar
  3. Botts, M., Percivall, G., Reed, C., & Davidson, J. (2008). OGC Sensor Web Enablement: OverviewAnd High LevelArchitecture. GeoSensor Networks, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 175–190). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Bröring, A., Echterhoff, J., Jirka, S., Simonis, I., Everding, T., Stasch, C., Liang, S., et al. (2011). New Generation Sensor Web Enablement. Sensors, 11(3), 2652–2699. doi:10.3390/s110302652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bröring, A., Maué, P., Janowicz, K., Nüst, D., & Malewski, C. (2011). Semantically-Enabled Sensor Plug & Play for the Sensor Web. Sensors, 11, 7568–7605. doi:10.3390/s110807568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cox, S. (2007). Observations and Measurements – Part 1 – Observation schema (Implementation specification No. 07-022r1). Wayland, MA, USA: OGC. Retrieved from http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/omGoogle Scholar
  7. Dey, A. K., & Abowd, G. D. (2000). Towards a better understanding of context and contextawareness. CHI 2000 workshop on the what, who, where, when, and how of contextawareness (Vol. 4, pp. 1–6).Google Scholar
  8. Foerster, T., Schaeffer, B., Baranski, B., & Brauner, J. (2011). Geospatial Web Services for Distributed Processing –Applications and Scenarios. In P. Zhao & L. Di (Eds.), Geospatial Web Services: Advances in Information Interoperability (pp. 245–286). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  9. Istepanian, R. S. H., Jovanov, E., & Zhang, Y. T. (2004). Guest Editorial Introduction to the Special Section on M-Health: Beyond Seamless Mobility and Global Wireless Health-Care Connectivity. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 8(4), 405–414. doi:10.1109/TITB.2004.840019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Janowicz, K., Bröring, A., Stasch, C., & Everding, T. (2010). Towards Meaningful URIs for Linked Sensor Data. In A. Devaraju, A. Llaves, P. Maue, & C. Kessler (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop “Towards Digital Earth: Search, Discover and Share Geospatial Data 2010” (p. 6). Presented at the Workshop at Future Internet Symposium, Berlin, Germany. Retrieved from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-640/paper2.pdfGoogle Scholar
  11. Jirka, S., & Nüst, D. (2010). OGC Sensor Instance Registry (OGC Discussion Paper No. OGC 10-171) (p. 97 pp.). Wayland, MA, USA: OGC.Google Scholar
  12. Jirka, S., Bröring, A., & Stasch, C. (2009). Applying OGC Sensor Web Enablement to Risk Monitoring and Disaster Management. Presented at the GSDI 11 World Conference, Rotterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  13. Jirka, S., Bröring, A., & Stasch, C. (2009). Discovery Mechanisms for the Sensor Web. Sensors, 9(4), 2661–2681. doi:10.3390/s90402661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jirka, S., Bröring, A., & Walkowski, A. (2010). Sensor Web in Practice. Geoinformatics, (13), 42–45.Google Scholar
  15. Klopfer, M., & Simonis, I. (Eds.). (2009). SANY – an open service architecture for sensor networks. SANY consortium.Google Scholar
  16. Kruijff, E., Mendez, E., Veas, E., & Gruenewald, T. (2010). On-Site Monitoring of Environmental Processes using Mobile Augmented Reality (HYDROSYS). In A. Berre, D. Roman, & P. Maue (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop “Environmental Information Systems and Services – Infrastructures and Platforms” (Vol. 679, p. 7). Presented at the Environmental Information Systems and Services – Infrastructures and Platforms, Bonn, Germany: CEUR. Retrieved from http://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/ CEUR-WS/Vol-679/paper2.pdfGoogle Scholar
  17. Müller, R., Fabritius, M., & Mock, M. (2011). An OGC compliant Sensor Observation Service for mobile sensors. In S. Geertman, W. Reinhardt, & F. Toppen (Eds.), Advancing Geoinformation Science for a Changing World (Vol. 1, pp. 163–184). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/978-3-642-19789-5_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nah, F. F.-H., Siau, K., & Sheng, H. (2005). The value of mobile applications: a utility company study. Commun. ACM, 48, 85–90. doi:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1042091.1042095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pebesma, E., Cornford, D., Dubois, G., Heuvelink, G. B. M., Hristopoulos, D., Pilz, J., Stöhlker, U., et al. (2010). INTAMAP: The design and implementation of an interoperable automated interpolation web service. Computers & Geosciences. doi:10.1016/j. cageo.2010.03.019Google Scholar
  20. Pebesma, E., Cornford, D., Nativi, S., & Stasch, C. (2010). The Uncertainty Enabled Model Web (UncertWeb). In A. Berre, D. Roman, & P. Maue (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop “Environmental Information Systems and Services – Infrastructures and Platforms” (Vol. 679, p. 9). Presented at the Environmental Information Systems and Services – Infrastructures and Platforms, Bonn, Germany: CEUR. Retrieved from http:// ceur-ws.org/Vol-679/paper10.pdfGoogle Scholar
  21. Raape, U., Teßmann, S., Wytzisk, A., Steinmetz, T., Wnuk, M., Hunold, M., Strobl, C., et al. (2010). Decision Support for Tsunami Early Warning in Indonesia: The Role of OGC Standards. In M. Konecny, S. Zlatanova, & T. L. Bandrova (Eds.), Geographic Information and Cartography for Risk and Crisis Management (pp. 233–247). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/978-3-642-03442-8_16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Richardson, L., & Ruby, S. (2007). RESTful web services. O’Reilly Media, Inc.Google Scholar
  23. Stasch, Christoph, Bröring, A., & Walkowski, A. C. (2008). Providing Mobile Sensor Data in a Standardized Way-The SOSmobile Web Service Interface. 11th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science.Google Scholar
  24. Tamayo, A., Viciano, P., Granell, C., & Huerta, J. (2011). Sensor Observation Service Client for Android Mobile Phones. Proceedings of SWE 2011. Presented at the SWE 2011 workshop, Banff, Alberta, Canda.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Theodor Foerster
    • 1
  • Daniel Nüst
    • 2
  • Arne Bröring
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Simon Jirka
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for GeoinformaticsUniversity of MuensterMünsterGermany
  2. 2.52°North GmbHMünsterGermany
  3. 3.ITCUniversity of TwenteEnschedeNetherlands

Personalised recommendations