Advertisement

Teachability and Learnability of English Pronunciation Features for Vietnamese-Speaking Learners

  • Una Cunningham
Chapter
Part of the Second Language Learning and Teaching book series (SLLT)

Abstract

Anyone who has tried to learn a language with a very different sound system will understand the challenges faced by speakers of a language as different as Vietnamese who are attempting to learn to speak English in a way that is intelligible to non-speakers of Vietnamese. Many learners have very limited opportunity to hear model pronunciations other than their teacher’s, and no opportunity at all to speak in English outside the classroom. Vietnamese-accented English is characterised by a number of features which ride roughshod over English morphosyntax, resulting in speech that is extremely difficult to reconstruct for the non-Vietnamese-speaking listener. Some of these features appear to be more difficult to learn to avoid than others. Phonotactic constraints in L1 appear to be persistent even in L2, and L1 phonological rules will, apparently, often apply in L2 unless they are blocked in some way. Perception of salient (to native listeners) target pronunciations is often lacking, and learners may not be aware that their pronunciation is not intelligible. Despite years of language study, many learners are unable to produce some native speaker targets. Vietnamese learners typically exhibit a set of characteristic pronunciation features in English, and the aim of this study is to see which of these are susceptible to remediation through explicit teaching. This explicit teaching is compared with a less direct, less interactive kind of teaching, involving drawing native and native-like pronunciation of problematic features of English pronunciation to the learners’ attention. The results of this study can then be interpreted in terms of teachability and learnability, which do not always go hand in hand. If we understand what kinds of phonetic features are teachable and how learnability varies for different features, we can target those features where there is a good return for effort spent, resulting in efficient teaching.

Keywords

Initial Cluster Final Cluster Phonetic Feature Vowel Quality Phonotactic Constraint 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Burda, Angela Noel, and Hageman, Carlin F. (2005). Perception of accented speech by residents in assisted-living facilities. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 13(1), 7–14.Google Scholar
  2. Celce-Murcia, Marianne, Brinton, Donna and Goodwin, Janet M. (2010). Teaching Pronunciation : A Course Book and Reference Guide (2 ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cervantes, Raoul, & Gainer, Glenn. (1992). The effects of syntactic simplification and repetition on listening comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 26(4), 767–770.Google Scholar
  4. Cunningham, Una. (2009a). Models and targets for English pronunciation in Vietnam and Sweden. Research in Language 7, 113–128.Google Scholar
  5. Cunningham, Una. (2009b). Phonetic correlates of unintelligibility in Vietnamese-accented English. Paper presented at the FONETIK 2009 The XXIIth Swedish Phonetics Conference. Available at http://www2.ling.su.se/fon/fonetik_2009/108%20cunningham_fonetik2009.pdf.
  6. Cunningham, Una. (2009c). Quality, quantity and intelligibility of vowels in Vietnamese-accented English. In Ewa Waniek-Klimczak (Ed.), Issues in Accents of English II: Variability and Norm. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  7. Cunningham-Andersson, Una & Engstrand, Olle. (1989). Perceived strength and identity of foreign accent in Swedish. Phonetica, 46(4), 138–154.Google Scholar
  8. Demuth, Katherine & McCullough, Elizabeth. (2009). The longitudinal development of clusters in French. Journal of Child Language, 36(2), 425–448.Google Scholar
  9. Derwing, Tracey. M., & Munro, Murray. J. (2010). Symposium - Accenting the positive: Directions in pronunciation research. Language Teaching, 43(3), 366–368.Google Scholar
  10. Flege, James Emil, Bohn, Ocke-Schwen, & Jang, Sunyoung. (1997). Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 437–470.Google Scholar
  11. Jakobson, Roman. (1942). Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitets årsskrift 9.Google Scholar
  12. Jenkins, Jennifer. (2000). The Phonology of English as an International Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Jenkins, Jennifer. (2002). A sociolinguistically based, empirically researched pronunciation syllabus for English as an international language. Applied Linguistics, 23(1), 83–103.Google Scholar
  14. Jenkins, Jennifer. (2005). Implementing an international approach to English pronunciation: The role of teacher attitudes and identity. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 535–543.Google Scholar
  15. Kennedy, Sara & Trofimovich, Pavel. (2008). Intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness of L2 speech: The role of listener experience and semantic context. Canadian Modern Language Review-Revue Canadienne Des Langues Vivantes, 64(3), 459–489.Google Scholar
  16. Kirk, Cecilia, & Demuth, Katherine. (2005). Asymmetries in the acquisition of word-initial and word-final consonant clusters. Journal of Child Language, 32(4), 709–734.Google Scholar
  17. Menn, Lise, & Stoel-Gammon, Carol. (1995). Phonological development. In Paul Fletcher & Brian MacWhinney (Eds.), The Handbook of Child Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Munro, Murray. J., & Derwing, Tracey. M. (1995). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of 2nd-language learners. Language Learning, 45(1), 73–97.Google Scholar
  19. Pienemann, Manfred. (1984). Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6(2), 186–214.Google Scholar
  20. Pienemann, Manfred. (1989). Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics 10(1), 52–79.Google Scholar
  21. Saragi, Thomas, Nation, Ian Stephen Paul, & Meister, Gerold Fritz. (1978). Vocabulary learning and reading. System, 6(2), 72–78.Google Scholar
  22. Scales, Julie, Wennerstrom, Ann., Richard, Dara, & Wu, Su Hui. (2006). Language learners’ perceptions of accent. TESOL Quarterly, 40(4), 715–738.Google Scholar
  23. Shillcock, Richard, and Westermann, Gert. (1997) The role of phonotactic range in the order of acquisition of English consonants. In Wolfram Ziegler & Karin Deger (Eds.) Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics. London: Whurr.Google Scholar
  24. Taylor, David S. (1993). Intonation and accent in English: What teachers need to know. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 31(1), 425–435.Google Scholar
  25. Tubbs, Nigel (2003). The concept of “teachability”. Educational Theory, 53(1), 75–91.Google Scholar
  26. Volberg, Leonie, Kulka, Marko, Sust, Charlotte. A., & Lazarus, Hans. (2006). Speech intelligibility and the subjective assessment of speech quality in near real communication conditions. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 92(3), 406–416.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of StockholmStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations