Advertisement

Monitoring Pattern-Based CSCL Scripts: A Case Study

  • María Jesús Rodríguez-Triana
  • Alejandra Martínez-Monés
  • Juan Ignacio Asensio-Pérez
  • Iván Manuel Jorrín-Abellán
  • Yannis Dimitriadis
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6964)

Abstract

Two strategies have been proposed in CSCL to foster effective collaboration: structuring the learning scenario by means of collaboration scripts and monitoring interactions among participants in order to detect and regulate potential deviations from the initial plan. In order to help teachers in this endeavor, we propose to combine these two approaches by means of a process where design takes into account the especial requirements posed by monitoring, and monitoring is informed by the characteristics of the scripts that must be met to achieve the learning goals. These desired features are obtained from the constraints defined by the collaborative-learning flow patterns on which the scripts are based. The result is an automated and higher-level view about the evolution of the learning process, integrating the data gathered from the different tools. This paper also presents a case study based on an authentic experience in higher education where these ideas were tried out.

Keywords

CSCL scripting monitoring Collaborative Learning Flow Patterns 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alario-Hoyos, C., Wilson, S.: Comparison of the main Alternatives to the Integration of External Tools in different Platforms. In: Proceedings of the International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, ICERI 2010, Madrid, Spain, pp. 3466–3476 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Demetriadis, S., Karakostas, A.: Adaptive Collaboration Scripting: A Conceptual Framework and a Design Case Study. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems, CISIS 2008, pp. 487–492. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dillenbourg, P.: Over-Scripting CSCL: the risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In: Three Worlds of CSCL. Can We Support CSCL?, pp. 61–91. Open Universiteit Nederland, Heerlen (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dillenbourg, P., Jermann, P.: SWISH: A model for designing CSCL scripts. In: Scripting Computer-Supported Communication of Knowledge Cognitive, Computational, and Educational Perspectives, pp. 1–10. Springer, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dillenbourg, P., Tchounikine, P.: Flexibility in macro-scripts for CSCL. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 23(1), 1–13 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    E-LEN: Design expertise for e-learning centers (2004), project website, http://www2.tisip.no/E-LEN/ (last visit: April 2011)
  7. 7.
    Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Haake, J., Mandl, H.: Perspectives on collaboration scripts. In: Scripting Computer-Supported Communication of Knowledge Cognitive, Computational, and Educational Perspectives, pp. 1–10. Springer, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goodyear, P.: Educational design and networked learning: patterns, pattern languages and design practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 21(1), 82–101 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gómez Sánchez, E., Bote Lorenzo, M., Jorrín Abellán, I., Vega Gorgojo, G., Asensio Pérez, J., Dimitriadis, Y.: Conceptual framework for design, technological support and evaluation of collaborative learning. International Journal of Engineering Education 25(3), 557–568 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hernández-Leo, D., Villasclaras-Fernández, E., Asensio-Pérez, J., Dimitriadis, Y.: Diagrams of learning flow patterns’ solutions as visual representations of refinable IMS Learning Design templates. In: Handbook of Visual Languages for Instructional Design: Theories and Practices. IGI Global,Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hernández-Leo, D., Villasclaras-Fernández, E., Asensio-Pérez, J., Dimitriadis, Y., Retalis, S.: CSCL Scripting Patterns: Hierarchical Relationships and Applicability. In: Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pp. 388–392. ICALT, Kerkrade (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    IMS Global Learning Consortium: IMS Learning Design Specifications (2003), http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/ (last visit: April 2011)
  13. 13.
    Jermann, P., Soller, A., Lesgold, A.: Computer Software Support for CSCL. In: Strijbos, J.W., Kirschner, P., Martens, R. (eds.) What We Know About CSCL.. and Implementing it in Higher Education, Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, vol. 3, pp. 141–166. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kahrimanis, G., Avouris, N., Komis, V.: Interaction analysis as a tool for supporting collaboration. An overview. In: Technology-Enhanced Systems and Tools for Collaborative Learning Scaffolding. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Karakostas, A., Demetriadis, S.: Adaptation patterns in systems for scripted collaboration. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, CSCL 2009, vol. 1, pp. 477–481. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Rhodes (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kobbe, L.: Framework on multiple goal dimensions for computer-supported scripts (2005), Kaleidoscope Noe. Deliverable D29.2.1Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Koschmann, T.: Paradigms Shift and Instructional Technology. In: CSCL: Theory and Practice of an Emerging Paradigm, pp. 1–23. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1996)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Martínez-Monés, A., Dimitriadis, Y., Harrer, A.: An interaction aware design process for the integration of interaction analysis in mainstream CSCL practices. In: Analyzing Collaborative Interactions in CSCL: Methods, Approaches and Issues, pp. 269–291. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    PPP: The Pedagogical Patterns Project (2005), project website, http://www.pedagogicalpatterns.org/ (last visit: April 2011)
  20. 20.
    Soller, A., Martínez, A., Jermann, P., Muehlenbrock, M.: From Mirroring to Guiding: a review of the state of the art in interaction analysis. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence in Education 15, 261–290 (2005)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., Suthers, D.: Computer-supported collaborative learning: an historical perspective. In: Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, pp. 409–426. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stake, R.: The art of Case Study Research. Sage Publications, London (1995)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    TELL: Towards Effective networked supported coLLaborative activities (2005), project website, http://cosy.ted.unipi.gr/tell/ (last visit: April 2011)
  24. 24.
    Villasclaras-Fernández, E., Hernández-Gonzalo, J., Hernández-Leo, D., Asensio-Pérez, J., Dimitriadis, Y., Martínez-Monés, A.: InstanceCollage: A Tool for the Particularization of Collaborative IMS-LD Scripts. New Directions in Advanced Learning Technologies. Educational Technology & Society 12(4), 56–70 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • María Jesús Rodríguez-Triana
    • 1
  • Alejandra Martínez-Monés
    • 1
  • Juan Ignacio Asensio-Pérez
    • 1
  • Iván Manuel Jorrín-Abellán
    • 1
  • Yannis Dimitriadis
    • 1
  1. 1.GSIC-EMIC, University of ValladolidSpain

Personalised recommendations