Empirical Evaluation of Computational Emotional Contagion Models

  • Jason Tsai
  • Emma Bowring
  • Stacy Marsella
  • Milind Tambe
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6895)

Abstract

In social psychology, emotional contagion describes the widely observed phenomenon of one person’s emotions being influenced by surrounding people’s emotions. While the overall effect is agreed upon, the underlying mechanism of the spread of emotions has seen little quantification and application to computational agents despite extensive evidence of its impacts in everyday life.

In this paper, we examine computational models of emotional contagion by implementing two models ([2] and [8]) that draw from two separate lines of contagion research: thermodynamics-based and epidemiological-based. We first perform sensitivity tests on each model in an evacuation simulation, ESCAPES, showing both models to be reasonably robust to parameter variations with certain exceptions. We then compare their ability to reproduce a real crowd panic scene in simulation, showing that the thermodynamics-style model ([2]) produces superior results due to the ill-suited contagion mechanism at the core of epidemiological models. We also identify that a graduated effect of fear and proximity-based contagion effects are key to producing the superior results. We then reproduce the methodology on a second video, showing that the same results hold, implying generality of the conclusions reached in the first scene.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barsade, S.G., Gibson, D.E.: Group Emotion: A View from Top and Bottom. In: Gruenfeld, D., Mannix, E., Neale, M. (eds.) Research on Managing on Groups and Teams, pp. 81–102. JAI Press, Stamford (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bosse, T., Duell, R., Memon, Z.A., Treur, J., Wal, C.N.V.D.: A Multi-Agent Model for Mutual Absorption of Emotions. In: European Council on Modeling and Simulation, ECMS 2009, pp. 212–218 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bosse, T., Hoogendoorn, M., Klein, M., Treur, J., van der Wal, N.: Agent-Based Analysis of Patterns in Crowd Behaviour Involving Contagion of Mental States. In: IEA/AIE 2011, Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brown, J.S., Martin, R.C., Morrow, M.W.: Self-punitive behavior in the rat: Facilitative effects of punishment on resistance to extinction. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 57(1), 127–133 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Diamond, J., McVay, M., Zavala, M.W.: Quick, Safe, Secure: Addressing Human Behavior During Evacuations at LAX. Master’s thesis, UCLA Dept of Public Policy (June 2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dodds, P., Watts, D.J.: A generalized model of social and biological contagion. Journal of Theoretical Biology 232(4), 587–604 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Doherty, W.: The Emotional Contagion Scale: A Measure of Individual Differences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 21(2) (1997)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Durupinar, F.: From Audiences to Mobs: Crowd Simulation with Psychological Factors. PhD dissertation, Bilkent University, Dept. Comp. Eng (July 2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grandey, A.A.: Emotional regulation in the workplace: A new way to conceptualize emotional labor. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 5(1), 95–110 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J.T., Rapson, R.L.: Emotional Contagion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kenny, P., Parsons, T.D., Gratch, J., Rizzo, A.A.: Evaluation of Justina: A Virtual Patient with PTSD. In: Prendinger, H., Lester, J.C., Ishizuka, M. (eds.) IVA 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5208, pp. 394–408. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kermack, W.O., McKendrick, A.G.: A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proceedings of The Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of A Mathematical and Physical Character (1905-1934) 115, 700–721 (1927)MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lundqvist, L.-O.: Factor Structure of the Greek Version of the Emotional Contagion Scale and its Measurement Invariance Across Gender and Cultural Groups. Journal of Individual Differences 29(3), 121–129 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Murray, J.D.: Mathematical Biology, 3rd edn. Springer, New York (2002)MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pugh, S.D.: Service with a smile: Emotional contagion in the service encounter. Academy of Management Journal 44(5), 1018–1027 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations. The Free Press, New York (1962)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schelling, T.C.: Hockey helmets, concealed weapons, and daylight saving: a study of binary choices with externalities. Journal of Conflict Resolution 17, 381–428 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tsai, J., Fridman, N., Bowring, E., Brown, M., Epstein, S., Kaminka, G., Marsella, S., Ogden, A., Rika, I., Sheel, A., Taylor, M.E., Wang, X., Zilka, A., Tambe, M.: ESCAPES: Evacuation Simulation with Children, Authorities, Parents, Emotions, and Social Comparison. In: AAMAS 2011, pp. 457–464. ACM Press, New York (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jason Tsai
    • 1
  • Emma Bowring
    • 2
  • Stacy Marsella
    • 3
  • Milind Tambe
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.University of the PacificStocktonUSA
  3. 3.USC Institute for Creative TechnologiesPlaya VistaUSA

Personalised recommendations