An Application of Fuzzy Logic to Strategic Environmental Assessment

  • Marco Gavanelli
  • Fabrizio Riguzzi
  • Michela Milano
  • Davide Sottara
  • Alessandro Cangini
  • Paolo Cagnoli
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6934)

Abstract

Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) is used to evaluate the environmental effects of regional plans and programs. SEA expresses dependencies between plan activities (infrastructures, plants, resource extractions, buildings, etc.) and environmental pressures, and between these and environmental receptors. In this paper we employ fuzzy logic and many-valued logics together with numeric transformations for performing SEA. In particular, we discuss four models that capture alternative interpretations of the dependencies, combining quantitative and qualitative information. We have tested the four models and presented the results to the expert for validation. The interpretability of the results of the models was appreciated by the expert that liked in particular those models returning a possibility distribution in place of a crisp result.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications. Academic Press, London (1980)MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Possibility theory, probability theory and multiple-valued logics: a clarification. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 32(1-4), 35–66 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gavanelli, M., Riguzzi, F., Milano, M., Cagnoli, P.: Logic-Based Decision Support for Strategic Environmental Assessment. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, Special Issue 10(4-6), 643–658 (2010); 26th Int’l. Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2010)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hájek, P.: Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic (Trends in Logic), 1st edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Novák, V.: Mathematical fuzzy logic in narrow and broader sense - a unified concept. In: BISCSE 2005. The Berkeley Initiative in Soft Computing, Univ. of California, Berkeley (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Saade, J.: A unifying approach to defuzzification and comparison of the outputs of fuzzy controllers. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 4(3), 227–237 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sorensen, J.C., Moss, M.L.: Procedures and programs to assist in the impact statement process. Tech. rep., Univ. of California, Berkeley (1973)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wulff, N., Sottara, D.: Fuzzy reasoning with a Rete-OO rule engine. In: Governatori, G., Hall, J., Paschke, A. (eds.) RuleML 2009. LNCS, vol. 5858, pp. 337–344. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco Gavanelli
    • 1
  • Fabrizio Riguzzi
    • 1
  • Michela Milano
    • 2
  • Davide Sottara
    • 2
  • Alessandro Cangini
    • 2
  • Paolo Cagnoli
    • 3
  1. 1.ENDIFUniversità di FerraraItaly
  2. 2.DEISUniversità di BolognaItaly
  3. 3.ARPA Emilia-RomagnaItaly

Personalised recommendations