Delayed Detached Eddy Simulations of Compressible Turbulent Mixing Layer and Detailed Performance Analysis of Scientific In-House Code TASCOM3D

  • Markus Kindler
  • Peter Gerlinger
  • Manfred Aigner

Abstract

In the present paper a compressible turbulent mixing layer is investigated using Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation (DDES). Thereby two compressible flows are divided by a splitter plate which join downstream of the plate and form a mixing and shear layer. The simulations are performed with the scientific code TASCOM3D (Turbulent All Speed Combustion Multigrid Solver) using a fifth-order upwind biased scheme combined with an improved multi-dimensional limiting process (MLP) (Gerlinger, 2011) for spatial discretization. The inviscid fluxes are calculated using the AUSM+-up flux vector splitting. DDES is a hybrid RANS/LES approach which uses a traditional Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) approach for wall-bounded regions and a Large Eddy Simulation (LES) approach for the mixing section. The simulations show a quasi two-dimensional flow field right after the splitter plate and a following conversion to a turbulent and highly unsteady flow field after short distance. Furthermore the performance of TASCOM3D on different HPC systems is analyzed: a vector (NEC SX-9) and a scalar processor based (Cray XE6) system, both installed at the High Performance Computing Center Stuttgart (HLRS). The investigation points out the challenges and problems in HPC and may serve other researchers as comparison and assistance to achieve good performance on the different architectures.

Keywords

Large Eddy Simulation Splitter Plate Detach Eddy Simulation Strong Scaling Convective Mach Number 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gerlinger, P.: High-Order Multi-Dimensional Limiting for Turbulent Flows and Combustion, AIAA paper 2011-296, 2011 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goebel, S.G., Dutton, C.D.: Experimental Study of Compressible Turbulent Mixing Layers, AIAA Journal, 28, pp. 538–546, 1991. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wilcox, D.C.: Formulation of the kω Turbulence Model Revisited, AIAA Journal, 46, pp. 2823–2838, 2008. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gerlinger, P.: Numerische Verbrennungssimulation, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg 2005, ISBN 3-540-23337-7. Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gerlinger, P.: Investigations of an Assumed PDF Approach for Finite-Rate-Chemistry, Combustion Science and Technology, 175, pp. 841–872, 2003. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liou, M.-S.: A Sequel to AUSM, PART II: AUSM+−up for all Speeds, Journal of Computational Physics, 214, pp. 137–170, 2006. CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shuen, J.S.: Upwind Differencing and LU Factorization for Chemical Non-Equilibrium Navier-Stokes Equations, Journal of Computational Physics, 99, pp. 233–250, 1992. CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jameson, A., Yoon, S.: Lower-Upper Implicit Scheme with Multiple Grids for the Euler Equations, AIAA Journal, 25, pp. 929–937, 1987. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gerlinger, P., Brüggemann, D.: An Implicit Multigrid Scheme for the Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations with Low-Reynolds-Number Turbulence Closure, Journal of Fluids Engineering, 120, pp. 257–262, 1998. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gerlinger, P., Möbus, H., Brüggemann, D.: An Implicit Multigrid Method for Turbulent Combustion, Journal of Computational Physics, 167, pp. 247–276, 2001. CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stoll, P., Gerlinger, P., Brüggemann, D.: Domain Decomposition for an Implicit LU-SGS Scheme Using Overlapping Grids, AIAA-paper 97-1896, 1997. Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stoll, P., Gerlinger, P., Brüggemann, D.: Implicit Preconditioning Method for Turbulent Reacting Flows, Proceedings of the 4th ECCOMAS Conference, 1, pp. 205–212, John Wiley & Sons, New York 1998. Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gerlinger, P., Brüggemann, D.: Numerical Investigation of Hydrogen Strut Injections into Supersonic Air Flows, Journal of Propulsion and Power, 16, pp. 22–28, 2000. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Spalart, P.R., Jou, W.-H., Strelets, M., Allmaras, S.R.: Comments on the feasibility of LES for wings, and on a hybrid RANS/LES approach, Advances in DNS/LES, 1997. Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spalart, P.R., Deck, S., Shur, M.L., Squires, K.D., Strelets, M., Travin, A.: A New Version of Detached-Eddy Simulation, Resistant to Ambiguous Grid Densities, Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn., 20, pp. 181–195, 2006. CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kindler, M., Gerlinger, P., Aigner, M.: Investigation of Hybrid RANS/LES Approaches for Compressible High Speed Flows, to be published, 2011. Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Travin, A., Shur, M.L., Strelets, M.: Physical and Numerical Upgrades in the Detached-Eddy Simulation of Complex Turbulent Flows, Advances in LES of Complex Flows, 65, pp. 239–254, 2004. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gerlinger, P., Stoll, P., Kindler, M., Schneider, F., Aigner, M.: Numerical Investigation of Mixing and Combustion Enhancement in Supersonic Combustors by Strut Induced Streamwise Vorticity, Aerospace Science and Technology, 12, pp. 159–168, 2008. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Markus Kindler
    • 1
  • Peter Gerlinger
    • 1
  • Manfred Aigner
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Verbrennungstechnik der Luft- und RaumfahrtUniversität StuttgartStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations