Advertisement

Enhanced Survivability- a Framework of Self-Healing Mechanisms’ Installation Using Axiomatic Design in Agile Manufacturing Systems

  • D.T. MattEmail author
Conference paper

Abstract

This paper presents a theoretic framework based on Axiomatic Design principles for the installation of self-healing strategies and mechanisms in order to control the effects of the time-dependent combinatorial complexity caused by the uncertainty of maintaining the fulfilment of once defined functional requirements for a production system. With the help of the scenario-technique, time-dependent influence is shown and self-healing strategies are developed, using functional periodicity as a trigger point for their release. A first application of the so developed theoretic framework at a medium-sized manufacturer of consumer durables which shows very promising results will be discussed.

Keyword:

Agile production Enhanced survivability Self-Healing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Pham, D.T.; Pham P.T.N. (2008): Integrated production machines and systems – beyond lean manufacturing, in: Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 19 No. 6, pp. 695-711.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Matt, D.T. (2010): Functional periodicity as a concept for the (re-)design to agility of production systems, in: Production Engineering - Research & Development, Special Issue: Part I: Changeable, Agile, Reconfigurable and Virtual Production, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 363-369.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Kuzgunkaya, O.; ElMaraghy, H. (2006): Assessing the structural complexity of manufacturing systems configurations, in: International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 18, pp. 145-171.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Blecker, T.; Abdelkafi, N.; Kaluza, B.; Kreutler, G. (2004): Mass Customization vs. Complexity: A Gordian Knot?, Proc. 2nd Int. Conf.”An Enterprise Odyssey: Building Competitive Advantage”, Zagreb/Croatia, pp. 890-903.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Züst, R.; Schregenberger, J. W. (2003): Systems Engineering, Eco-Performance, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    H. Simon (1962): The architecture of complexity. American Philosophical Society, pp. 467-482.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Matt, D.T. (2007) Achieving operational excellence through systematic complexity reduction in manufacturing system design, in: Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 344, pp. 865-872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Ulrich, H.; Probst, G. (1988): Anleitung zum ganzheitlichen Denken und Handeln, Paul Haupt Verlag, Germany.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Naylor, J. B., Naim M. M.; Berry D., (1999): Leagility: integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain, in: International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 62, pp. 107-118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Suh, N.P. (2005): Complexity–theory and applications, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Locasto, M. E. (2007): Self-healing: science, engineering, and fiction. In proceedings of the 16th New Security Paradigms Workshop (NSPW 2007). September 2007, White Mountain Hotel and Resort, New Hampshire, USA.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Ghosh, D.; Sharman, R.; Rao, H. R.; Upadhyaya, S. (2007): Self-healing systems - survey and synthesis, in: Decision Support Systems, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 2164–2185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Nagpal, R.; Kondacs, A.; Chang, C. (2003): Programming methodology for biologically-inspired self-assembling systems, AAAI Symposium.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    George, S.; Evans, D.; Marchette, S. (2003): A biological programming model for self-healing, First ACM Workshop on Survivable and Self-Regenerative Systems.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Sharman, R.; Rao, H.R.; Upadhyaya, S.; Khot, P.; Manocha, S.; Ganguly, S. (2004): Functionality defense by heterogeneity: a new paradigm for securing systems, 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Forrest, S.; Somayaji, A.; Ackley, D. (1997): Building diverse computer systems, In Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Inverardi, P.; Mancinelli, F.; Marinelli, G. (2002): Correct deployment and adaptation of software application on heterogeneous (mobile) devices, Proceedings of the First Workshop on Self-Healing Systems.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Dabrowski, C.; Mills, K.L. (2002): Understanding self-healing in servicediscovery systems, Proceedings of the First Workshop on Self-Healing Systems.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Merideth, M.G.; Narasimhan, P. (2003): Proactive containment of malice in survivable distributed system, International Conference on Security and Management, Las Vegas, NV.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Gilmore, A.; Carson, D. (1996): “Integrative” qualitative methods in a services context, in: Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 21-26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Ghauri, P. (2004): Designing and conducting case studies in international business research, in: R. Marschan-Piekkari & C. Welch (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research methods for international business. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 109-124.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Perren, L.; Ram, M. (2004): Case-study method in small business and entrepreneurial research. International Small Business Journal, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 83-101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Halinen, A., Törnroos, J-Å. (2005): Using case methods in the study of contemporary business networks, in: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 58, No. 9, pp. 1279-1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Suh, N. P. (2001): Axiomatic design: Advance and applications. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Engelhardt, F.; Nordlund, M. (2000): Strategic Planning based on axiomatic design, in: Proceedings of ICAD 2000 First International Conference on Axiomatic Design, Cambridge,/MA.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Franzellin, V.M.; Matt, D.T.; Rauch, E. (2010): The (Future) Customer Value in the Focus - An axiomatic design method combined with a Delphi approach to improve the success rate of new strategies, products or services. In: Proceedings of IMETI 2010 - The 3rd International Multi-Conference on Engineering and Technological Innovation, June 29th - July 2nd 2010 – Orlando, Florida, USA, pp.293-300.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Schriefer, A.; D. Mercer (1996): Scenarios Made Easy - Getting the Most Out of Scenarios, in: The Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 175-176.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Jauch, L. R.; Glueck, W. F. (1988): Business Policy and Strategic Management, 1st Edition, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Dalkey, N. C.; Helmer, O. (1962): An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts (Report No. RM- 727-PR) (Abridged). Santa Monica, CA: The RAND CorporationGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Rowe, G.; Wright, G. (1999): The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis, International Journal of Forecasting Vol. 15, pp. 353–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Faculty of Science and TechnologyBolzanoItaly

Personalised recommendations