Methodology for Flexibility Measurement in Semi-automatic Production

  • S. Rogalski
  • H. Wicaksono
Conference paper


Demands on production systems are changing constantly as a result of changing competitive conditions and are also closely linked to the performance goals of time, quality, costs and innovation ability. This results in an ever increasing selection between various competitors, with the most important selection criteria being customer individualization, an increasingly shorter product life cycle and new technological innovations. This situation creates an existential need for production companies to manage to adapt over time to the changed surrounding conditions and plan their resources in a way that makes them suitable for cost-effective and market-oriented manufacturing. The following article presents the computerized methodology of an innovative evaluation technique called ecoFLEX which allows the measurement of a production system’s flexibility. At first the paper details the general concept for estimating production flexibility and the approach to concretely calculating the flexibility on different production levels. Furthermore, it presents the practical experience gained in ecoFLEX during its application at a small and medium enterprise (SME) to evaluate the complex manufacturing coherencies from the perspective of their efficiency. Especially it will be shown how the usage of flexibility indices calculated by ecoFLEX helps to come to the right decision on the strategic and operational level in production systems.


Flexibility Measurement Production Systems Resource Efficiency Production 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Zäh, M. F.; Müller, N. (2007): On Planning and Evaluating Capacity Flexibilities in Uncertain Markets, 2th International Conference on Changeable, Agile, Reconfigurable and Virtual Production (CARV 2007), Toronto/Canada.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Georgoulias, K.; Papakostas, N.; Makris, S.; Chryssolouris, G. (2007): A Toolbox Approach for Flexibility Measurements in Diverse Environments. in: CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, Volume 56, Issue 1.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Rogalski, S. (2010): New Flexibility Tool Application in a Medium Production Company, Presentation and Proceeding, 20th International Conference Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing (FAIM 2010), San Francisco.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Krappe, H.; Rogalski, S.; Sander, M. (2006): Challenges for Handling Flexibility in the Change Management Process of Manufacturing Systems. IEEE Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (IEEE-CASE), Shanghai.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Horst Wildemann, H. (2005): Betreibermodelle: Ein Beitrag zur Steigerung der Flexibilität von Unternehmen (A Contribution to Increase the Flexibility in Companies), in: Kaluza, B.; Blecker, T. (Hrsg.): Erfolgsfaktor Flexibilität (Success Factor Flexibility), Erich Schmidt Verlag (Publisher), Berlin.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Meinberg, U.; Jakobza, J. (2005): A Knowledge Based Approach for Holistic Decision Support in Manufacturing Systems, in: Studies in classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization, Springer, S. 552-558, Berlin.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Sk Ahad Ali; Hamid Seifoddini (2006): Simulation intelligence and modeling for manufacturing uncertainties. Proceedings of the 38th conference on Winter simulation (WSC 2006), December 03 - 06, 2006, Monterey.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Zäh, M. F.; von Bredow, M.; Möller, N. (2006): Methoden zur Bewertung von Flexibilität in der Produktion, in: Industrie Management, 4/2006, GITO-Verlag (Publisher), Berlin.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Kaluza, B.; Blecker, T. (2005): Flexibilität - State of the Art und Entwicklungstrends (Flexibility - State of the Art and Trends) in: Kaluza, B.; Blecker, T. (Hrsg.): Erfolgsfaktor Flexibilität (Success Factor Flexibility). Erich Schmidt Verlag (Publisher), Berlin.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Schuh, G.; Wernhörner, N.; Friedrich, C. (2005): Lifecycle oriented evaluation of automotive body shop flexibility, in: Zäh, M.F. u.a. (Hrsg.): CARV 2005, S. 433-439, Munich.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Rogalski, S. (2010): Practical Experience in the ecoFLEX Flexibilty Evaluation Tool in Medium Sized Companies, in: IST Transactions of Control Engineering - Theory and Applications, Vol.1, No.1 (2) ISSN 1913-8784, pp. 14-18, Hamilton.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Rogalski, S.; Ovtcharova, J. (2009): ecoFLEX – Inter-branch Methodology for Flexibility Measurements of Production Systems, Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing, 19th International Conference (FAIM 2009), 6 - 8 July 2009,Middlesbrough.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.FZI Research Center for Information TechnologyKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations