Merging Belief Bases by Negotiation
Belief merging has been an active research field with many important applications. Many approaches for belief merging have been proposed, but these approaches only take the belief bases as inputs without the adequate attention to the role of agents, who provide the belief bases, thus the results achieved are merely ideal and difficult to apply in the multi-agent systems. In this paper, we present a merging approach based on the negotiation techniques. A new model is proposed in which agents gradually build their common belief base from the beliefs that they provide in each round of negotiation. A set of postulates is also introduced to characterize the logical properties of the merging results.
KeywordsBelief merging Belief Negotiation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 4.Booth, R.: A negotiation-style framework for non-prioritised revision. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2001, pp. 137–150. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (2001)Google Scholar
- 6.Everaere, P., Konieczny, S., Marquis, P.: Conflict-based merging operators. In: KR, pp. 348–357 (2008)Google Scholar
- 9.Konieczny, S., Pérez, R.P.: Merging information under constraints: a logical framework, vol. 12, pp. 773–808 (2002)Google Scholar
- 13.Qi, G., Liu, W., Bell, D.A.: Merging stratified knowledge bases under constraints. In: Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, pp. 281–286. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2006)Google Scholar