Numerical Algorithms for ESM: Future Perspectives for Atmospheric Modelling

Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Earth System Sciences book series (BRIEFSEARTHSYST, volume 1)

Abstract

In the past two decades, a number of factors have reenlivened the debate on the optimal numerical techniques for the highly demanding tasks of climate simulation. The increasing amount of computer power available has made viable options that would have appeared unfeasible not long ago. This growth in computational power has also been accompanied by major changes in computer architecture, such as the development of massively parallel computers. Therefore, great emphasis has been placed on the application of highly scalable techniques that can employ most efficiently large numbers of relatively small sized CPUs.

Keywords

Spectral Element Spectral Element Method Primitive Equation Model Optimal Numerical Technique High Order Finite Element 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adcroft A, Campin J, Hill C, Marshall J (2004) Implementation of an atmosphere-ocean general circulation model on the expanded spherical cube. Mon Weather Rev 132:2845–2863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arakawa A, Lamb V (1981) A potential enstrophy and energy conserving scheme for the shallow water equations. Mon Weather Rev 109:18–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonaventura L, Ringler T (2005) Analysis of discrete shallow water models on geodesic Delaunay grids with C-type staggering. Mon Weather Rev 133:2351–2373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caya A, Laprise R, Zwack P (1998) Consequences of using the splitting method for implementing physical forcings in a semi-implicit, semi-Lagrangian model. Mon Weather Rev 126:1707–1713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheong H (2000) Application of double Fourier series to the shallow-water equations on a sphere. J Comput Phys 165:261–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheong H (2006) A dynamical core with double Fourier series: comparison with the spherical harmonics method. Mon Weather Rev 134:1299–1315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cullen M, Salmond D (2003) On the use of a predictor–corrector scheme to couple the dynamics with the physical parametrizations in the ECMWF model. Q J Royal Meteorol Soc 129:1217–1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dubal M, Wood N, Staniforth A (2005) Mixed parallel–sequential-split schemes for time-stepping multiple physical parameterizations. Mon Weather Rev 133:989–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dubal M, Wood N, Staniforth A (2006) Some numerical properties of approaches to physics–dynamics coupling for NWP. Q J Royal Meteorol Soc 132:27–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Giraldo F (1998) The Lagrange–Galerkin spectral element method on unstructured quadrilateral grids. J Comput Phys 147:114–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Giraldo F (2001) A spectral element shallow water model on spherical geodesic grids. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 35:869–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Giraldo F, Rosmond T (2004) A scalable spectral element Eulerian atmospheric model (SEE-AM) for NWP: dynamical core tests. Mon Weather Rev 132:133–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Giraldo F, Hesthaven J, Warburton T (2002) High-order discontinuous Galerkin methods for the spherical shallow water equations. J Comput Phys 181:499–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Giraldo F, Perot J, Fischer P (2003) A spectral element semi-Lagrangian (SESL) method for the spherical shallow water equations. J Comput Phys 190:623–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heikes R, Randall D (1995) Numerical integration of the shallow-water equations on a twisted icosahedral grid. Part I: basic design and results of tests. Mon Weather Rev 123:1862–1880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Laprise J, Plante R (1995) A class of semi-Lagrangian integrated-mass (SLIM) numerical transport algorithms. Mon Weather Rev 123:553–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leonard B, Lock A, MacVean M (1996) Conservative explicit unrestricted-time-step multidimensional constancy-preserving advection schemes. Mon Weather Rev 124:2588–2606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lin S, Rood R (1996) Multidimensional flux-form semi-Lagrangian transport schemes. Mon Weather Rev 124:2046–2070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lipscomb W, Ringler T (2005) An incremental remapping transport scheme on a spherical geodesic grid. Mon Weather Rev 133:2335–2350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Majewski D, Liermann D, Prohl P, Ritter B, Buchhold M, Hanisch T, Paul G, Wergen W, Baumgardner J (2002) The operational global icosahedral-hexagonal gridpoint model GME: description and high resolution tests. Mon Weather Rev 130:319–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nair R D, Machenhauer B (2002) The mass-conservative cell-integrated semi-Lagrangian advection scheme on the sphere. Mon Weather Rev 130:649–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nair R D, Scroggs J, Semazzi F (2002) Conservative global transport schemes for climate and atmospheric chemistry models. Mon Weather Rev 130:2059–2073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nair R D, Thomas S, Loft R (2005) A Discontinuous Galerkin transport scheme on the cubed sphere. Mon Weather Rev 133:814–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rancic M, Purser R, Mesinger F (1996) A global shallow-water model using an expanded spherical cube: gnomonic versus conformal coordinates. Q J Royal Meteorol Soc 122:959–982Google Scholar
  25. Restelli M, Bonaventura L, Sacco R (2006) A semi-Lagrangian Discontinuous Galerkin method for scalar advection by incompressible flows. J Comput Phys 216:195–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ringler T, Randall D (2002) A potential enstrophy and energy conserving numerical scheme for solution of the shallow-water equations a geodesic grid. Mon Weather Rev 130:1397–1410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ringler T, Heikes R, Randall D (2000) Modeling the atmospheric general circulation using a spherical geodesic grid: a new class of dynamical cores. Mon Weather Rev 128:2471–2490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ringler T, Thuburn J, Klemp J, Skamarock W (2010) A unified approach to energy conservation and potential vorticity dynamics for arbitrarily-structured C-grids. J Comput Phys 229:3065–3090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ronchi C, Iacono R, Paolucci R (1996) The “cubed sphere”: a new method for the solution of partial differential equations in spherical geometry. J Comput Phys 124:93–114Google Scholar
  30. Sadourny R (1972) Conservative finite-difference approximations of the primitive equations on quasi-uniform spherical grids. Mon Weather Rev 100:136–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sadourny R (1975) The dynamics of finite difference models of the shallow water equations. J Atmos Sci 32:680–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Taylor M, Tribbia J, Iskandarani M (1997) The spectral element method for the shallow water equations on the sphere. Mon Weather Rev 130:92–108Google Scholar
  33. Thomas S, Loft R (2002) Semi-implicit spectral element method for the shallow water equations on the sphere. J Sci Comput 17:339–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thuburn J (1997) A PV-based shallow-water model on a hexagonal-icosahedral grid. Mon Weather Rev 125:2328–2347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tomita H, Satoh M (2004) A new dynamical framework of nonhydrostatic global model using the icosahedral grid. Fluid Dyn Res 34:357–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tomita H, Tsugawa M, Satoh M, Goto K (2001) Shallow water model on a modified icosahedral geodesic grid by using spring dynamics. J Comput Phys 174:579–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tomita H, Goto K, Satoh M (2008) A new approach to atmospheric general circulation model: global cloud resolving model NICAM and its computational performance. SIAM J Sci Comput 30:2755–2776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Williamson D. (1979) Numerical methods used in atmospheric models, vol. II, WMO, GARP Publication series no.17Google Scholar
  39. Zerroukat M, Wood N, Staniforth A (2004) SLICE-S: a semi-Lagrangian inherently conserving and efficient scheme for transport problems on the sphere. Q J Royal Meteorol Soc 130:2649–2664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zerroukat M, Wood N, Staniforth A (2005) A monotonic and positive-definite filter for a semi-Lagrangian inherently conserving and efficient (SLICE) scheme. Q J Royal Meteorol Soc 131:2923–2936CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di MatematicaMOX-Politecnico di MilanoMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations